切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 622 -624. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.06.024.

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下全系膜切除的结肠癌根治术对患者近远期预后的影响
姚永良1,(), 余凤1, 杨珮1   
  1. 1. 655000 云南曲靖,云南省曲靖市第二人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-11 出版日期:2019-12-26
  • 通信作者: 姚永良

Effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision of colon cancer on short-term and long-term prognosis of patients

Yongliang Yao1,(), Feng Yu1, Pei Yang1   

  1. 1. The second people’s hospital of Qujing city, Yunnan province 655000
  • Received:2018-10-11 Published:2019-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Yongliang Yao
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Yao Yongliang, Email:
引用本文:

姚永良, 余凤, 杨珮. 腹腔镜下全系膜切除的结肠癌根治术对患者近远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 622-624.

Yongliang Yao, Feng Yu, Pei Yang. Effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision of colon cancer on short-term and long-term prognosis of patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 622-624.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下全系膜切除的结肠癌根治术对患者近远期预后的影响。

方法

回顾性收集2008年4月至2013年4月间收治的80例结肠癌患者的临床资料,按照手术方式不同分为腔镜组和开腹组,各40例,分别接受腹腔镜下全结肠系膜切除术和传统开腹术。采用统计学软件SPSS21.0进行分析,两组患者近期疗效指标的比较采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症发生率及远期预后指标的比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

腔镜组患者的术中出血量、肛门排气时间均少于开腹组(均P<0.05),淋巴结清扫数目多于开腹组(P<0.05);两组患者手术时间及住院时间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);腔镜组术后并发症总发生率为5.0%,低于开腹组的22.5%,而差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.5294, P>0.05);腔镜组患者5年复发率为10.0%,显著低于开腹组的30.0%(χ2=5.000, P<0.05);腔镜组5年生存率为95.0%,显著高于开腹组的80.0%(χ2=6.274, P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜下全系膜切除术治疗结肠癌,可降低患者术中出血量,缩短肛门排气时间,淋巴结清扫较为彻底,近远期疗效均优于传统开腹术,值得推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision of colon cancer on short-term and long-term prognosis of patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients with colon cancer admitted to our hospital from April 2008 to April 2013 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into laparoscopic group and open group according to different surgical methods, each 40 cases. They were given laparoscopic complete mesocolic radical resection and traditional laparotomy respectively. Data analysis was performed by statistical software SPSS21.0. The short-term efficacy index of the two groups was compared by two independent samples t test. The complication rate and long-term prognosis of the two groups were compared by χ2 test.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss and anal exhaust time of the laparoscopic group were shorter than those of the open group (P<0.05), and the number of lymph node dissection was more than that of the open group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time and hospitalization time between the two groups (all P>0.05); The total incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group was 5.0%, which was lower than 22.5% in the open group, but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 =3.5294, P>0.05). The 3-year recurrence rate was 10.0% in the laparoscopic group, which was significantly lower than 30.0% in the open group. The difference was statistically significant χ2 =5.0000, P<0.05). The 3-year survival rate in the laparoscopic group was 95.0%, which was significantly higher than 80.0% in the open group. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 =6.2745, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten anal exhaust time, which lymph node dissection was complete, complication rate is lower, and short-term and long-term prognosis are all better, the effect is significant and it is worthy of promotion and application.

表1 80例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者基本资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 80例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者近期疗效指标的比较(±s)
表3 80例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率的比较(例)
表4 80例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者远期预后的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Yamashita K,et al. Optimal Surgery for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018,42(10): 3398-3404.
[2]
Yun JA, Yun SH, Park YA,et al.Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy for Colon Cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(5): 973-978.
[3]
秦颖,张海涛,文剑锋,等. 腹腔镜与开腹治疗结肠癌的临床疗效及对机体免疫功能的影响对比[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018,12(1): 61-64.
[4]
Chang WK, Yun DH, Kim HY,et al. Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic resection of right-sided colon cancer by complete mesocolic excision[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(26): e3982-e3982.
[5]
Feinberg AE, Chesney TR, Acuna SA,et al. Oncologic Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Resection of pT4 Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(1): 116-125.
[6]
Khan MW, Tsuji S, Tian MX,et al.Abstract A05: Immunity, the colonic environment, and colon cancer[J].Cancer Research,2016,76(15 Supplement): A05-A05.
[7]
魏鸿,王灿. 腹腔镜下结直肠全系膜切除术与传统开腹手术对结直肠癌患者的免疫功能及预后比较[J]. 医学综述,2016, 22(17): 3462-3465.
[8]
Chien TJ, Liu CY, Lu RH,et al. Therapeutic efficacy of Traditional Chinese medicine, "Kuan-Sin-Yin" ,in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced colon cancer-A controlled trial[J]. Complement Ther Med, 2016, 29: 204-212.
[9]
王学良,陈泽华.结肠癌患者行腹腔镜下全结肠系膜切除术后的近远期生存率及对其细胞免疫功能的影响分析[J]. 检验医学与临床,2017, 14(Z1): 129-131.
[10]
Phipps AI, Shi Q, Limburg PJ, et al. Alcohol consumption and colon cancer prognosis among participants in north central cancer treatment group phase III trial N0147[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 139(5): 986-995.
[11]
金岩柏,樊红. 腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与开腹结肠癌根治术的近、远期疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018,12(1): 65-67.
[12]
Fang JC, Faerber G, Samadder J. Digital rectal examination for prostate cancer screening performed with colonoscopy for colon cancer screening: Two for the price of one[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2017, 86(6): 1147-1150.
[13]
刘峰. 右半结肠癌全结肠系膜切除术联合中央血管结扎与传统结肠癌根治术治疗效果比较[J]. 河北医药,2017,39(24): 3781-3783.
[14]
Miyo M, Takemasa I, Ishihara H,et al. Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(7): 664-673.
[15]
王晓辉,方育,李嘉,等. 腹腔镜下全结肠系膜切除术与传统结肠癌手术的近期疗效比较[J]. 中国医刊,2016, 51(7): 38-41.
[16]
Chen C, Huang P, Lai L,et al. Dexmedetomidine improves gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer:A randomized clinical trial[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(29): e4295-e4295.
[17]
崔勇,姚震旦,杨宏,等. 腹腔镜与开腹全结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌疗效比较[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2016, 31(2): 155-156.
[18]
Duan BS, Zhao GH, Yang H,et al. A Pooled Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(6): 523-530.
[19]
房俊,崔小鹏,樊勇,等. 腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗老年结肠癌患者的近期疗效评价及对机体免疫力的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2017, 17(20): 3888-3892.
[20]
雷云鹏,何立锐,吕国庆,等. 右半结肠癌腹腔镜辅助下全结肠系膜切除术疗效观察[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(6): 478-479.
[21]
杨先铭. 腹腔镜在全结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌中的应用体会[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(1): 16-19.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[11] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[12] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要