切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 52 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.01.015.

论著

不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比
李华志1, 曹广1,(), 刘殿刚2, 张雅静1   
  1. 1.100029 北京,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院普外科
    2.100053 北京,首都医科大学宣武医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-28 出版日期:2025-02-26
  • 通信作者: 曹广
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金(L182048)

Clinical comparison of descending hepatectomy with different approaches for primary hepatocellular carcinoma

Huazhi Li1, Guang Cao1,(), Diangang Liu2, Yajing Zhang1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100029,China
    2.Department of General Surgery,Xuanwu Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053,China
  • Received:2024-04-28 Published:2025-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Guang Cao
引用本文:

李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.

Huazhi Li, Guang Cao, Diangang Liu, Yajing Zhang. Clinical comparison of descending hepatectomy with different approaches for primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.

目的

比较不同入路行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2019 年1 月至2023 年1 月接受肝切除术的103 例原发性肝细胞癌患者资料,依据手术入路不同分为悬吊组(实施绕肝悬吊前入路,n=53 例)与传统组(行传统入路,n=50 例)。采用SPSS 25.0 软件分析数据,术中失血量、手术时间等计量资料以(x± s)表示,行独立样本t 检验;术后并发症发生情况等计数资料行χ2检验;肝功能分级等级资料采用秩和检验;生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier 法并行Log-Rank 检验。以P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者术中出血量、血浆输注量比较,悬吊组少于传统组(P<0.05);两组患者手术时间、术后进食时间、下床时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);悬吊组患者住院时间、并发症发生率均低于传统组(P<0.05);两组患者随访1 年期间无进展生存率、总生存率比较,悬吊组高于传统组(P<0.05)。

结论

较传统入路,经绕肝悬吊前入路行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌可减少术中出血量、血浆输注量,降低术后并发症发生率,促进患者恢复,且有利于提高患者短期生存率。

Objective

To compare the effects of hepatectomy with different approaches in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Method

The data of 103 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatectomy from January 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different surgical approaches, they were divided into suspension group (n=53 cases with anterior liver suspension approach) and traditional group (n=50 cases with traditional approach).SPSS 25.0 software was used to analyze the data.Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and other measurement data were expressed as (x ± s), and independent sample t test was performed.The incidence of postoperative complications were counted by χ2 test.Rank Sum test was used for liver function grades.Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis.P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The amount of intraoperative blood loss and plasma infusion in suspension group was lower than that in traditional group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative feeding time and getting out of bed time between the two groups (P>0.05).The length of hospital stay and incidence of complications in suspension group were lower than those in traditional group (P<0.05).The progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate of the two groups were higher in the suspension group than in the traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the traditional approach, hepatectomy by suspending the liver around the anterior approach can reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss and plasma infusion, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, promote the recovery of patients, and improve the short-term survival rate of patients.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者手术相关指标比较(x ± s
表3 两组患者术后恢复相关指标比较(x± s
表4 两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
图1 两组患者术后累积无进展生存曲线
图2 两组患者术后累积总生存曲线
[1]
McGlynn KA, Petrick JL, El-Serag HB.Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].Hepatology, 2021, 73(1): 4-13.
[2]
杨河,符敏,王琳,等.解剖性肝切除术对肿瘤直径≤2cm合并微血管瘤栓(MVI)的肝细胞癌患者临床疗效及预后影响研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(06):605-609.
[3]
Crafa F, Vanella S, Coppola Bottazzi E, et al.Extended Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2022, 29(2): 960-961.
[4]
Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Zimmermann P, et al.Anterior Versus Classical Approach During Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Inverse Propensity Score Weighted Analysis[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2023, 27(10): 2092-2102.
[5]
武强,宋天强,李强,等.绕肝带提拉法在肝切除术中的应用进展[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2022, 34(04): 253-256.
[6]
李磊,周晓春,李向利,等.前入路联合绕肝提拉法腹腔镜右肝巨大肿瘤切除术临床疗效研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(06): 635-638.
[7]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局.原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版[)J].临床肝胆病杂志,2020, 36(02):277-292.
[8]
张长坤,张龙辉,王东,等.术前肝功能Child-Pugh评分与白蛋白-胆红素评分对肝癌患者肝切除术后肝衰竭和预后的预测价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018, 17(05): 474-482.
[9]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会.精准肝切除术专家共识[J].中华消化外科杂志,2017, 16(09): 883-893.
[10]
郑树国,王保林.腹腔镜肝切除术中出血的风险因素及对策[J].中国实用外科杂志,2022, 42(09): 970-974.
[11]
孙启刚,符策雄,郑进方.绕肝悬吊前入路右半肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用研究[J].临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(08):748-750.
[12]
高德康,危少华,马孝明,等.肝癌大范围肝切除术后骨骼肌减少的危险因素及其与术后并发症的相关性研究[J].中国全科医学,2023, 26(32): 4031-4037.
[13]
Nanashima A, Hiyoshi M, Imamura N, et al.Liver hanging maneuver is suitable in major hepatectomy for liver malignancies over 5 cm[ J].Turk J Surg, 2022, 38(3): 215-220.
[14]
Makdissi FF, de Mattos BVH, Kruger JAP, et al.A Combined“Hanging Liver Maneuver” and “Intrahepatic Extra-Glissonian Approach” for Anatomical Right Hepatectomy: Technique Standardization, Results, and Correlation With Portal Pedicle Anatomy[ J].Front Surg, 2021, 21(8): 690408.
[15]
Aida T, Haruki K, Okui N, et al.Triple liver hanging maneuver for hepatic central bisectionectomy with caudate lobectomy for resection of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (with video[)J].Surg Today, 2022, 52(5): 866-869.
[16]
Hirukawa K, Masuda Y, Abe Y, et al.Standardized upfront Glissonean approach and liver hanging maneuver reduces bile leakage from the hepatic hilum in living donors[ J].Liver Transpl,2023, 29(1): 48-57.
[17]
高怀军.原发性肝癌手术切除生存预后评价及相关危险因素分析[J].山西医药杂志,2023, 52(12): 930-934.
[18]
唐任超,赵振荣,王康宣,等.肝悬吊术在腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用研究进展[J].海南医学,2023, 34(06): 893-897.
[19]
赵俊,周大臣,侯辉,等.腹腔镜肝切除术对肝细胞肝癌切除术后肝功能的影响[J].肝胆外科杂志,2021, 29(03): 177-181.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[4] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[5] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[6] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[10] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[11] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[12] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[13] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[14] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要