切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 15 -18. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.01.006.

论著

腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究
陈方鹏1, 杨大伟2, 金从稳2,()   
  1. 1.237000 安徽六安,皖西卫生职业学院附属医院肿瘤科
    2.237000 安徽六安,皖西卫生职业学院附属医院普外科一病区
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-08 出版日期:2025-02-26
  • 通信作者: 金从稳
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度安徽省卫生健康科研项目(AHWJ2022C034)

Effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy combined with modified esophagogastrostomy to reconstruct His Angle in patients with postoperative reflux esophagitis

Fangpeng Chen1, Dawei Yang2, Congwen Jin2,()   

  1. 1.Department of Oncology,Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational College,Liuan Anhui Province 237000,China
    2.Department of General Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational College,Liuan Anhui Province 237000,China
  • Received:2024-01-08 Published:2025-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Congwen Jin
引用本文:

陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.

Fangpeng Chen, Dawei Yang, Congwen Jin. Effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy combined with modified esophagogastrostomy to reconstruct His Angle in patients with postoperative reflux esophagitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.

目的

探究腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术(LPG)联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎(RE)的临床效果。

方法

前瞻性选取2021年1月至2023年9月108例行LPG的患者为研究对象,采用信封法分为传统组和改良组,每组患者各54例。两组均行LPG,消化道重建过程中传统组采用传统的食管胃吻合法,改良组采用改良食管胃吻合术重建His角法。应用SPSS 25.0软件行数据分析,围手术期各项指标及反流性疾病问卷(RDQ)总分等计量资料用(±s)表示,比较采用独立样本t检验;并发症发生率、Visick评分分级及RE严重程度分级等计数资料用[例(%)]表示,比较用χ2检验或秩和检验。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

改良组和传统组患者手术时间、消化道重建时间、淋巴结清扫枚数、术中出血量、肠功能恢复时间及术后住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);改良组患者并发症总发生率显著低于传统组(22.2% vs. 40.7%,P<0.05);改良组患者术后Visick评分分级及RE严重程度分布情况均优于传统组,RDQ总分显著低于传统组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

LPG联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角是安全、可行的,不会增加围手术期相关风险,同时可有效降低术后并发症发生风险,且抗反流效果显著,是一种较为理想的术式。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG)combined with modified esophagogastrostomy to reconstruct His Angle on postoperative reflux esophagitis (RE).

Methods

108 patients with LPG from January 2021 to September 2023 were prospectively selected as the study objects, and were divided into traditional group and improved group by envelope method, with 54 patients in each group.Both groups were treated with LPG.In the process of digestive tract reconstruction, traditional esophagogastric anastomosis was used in the traditional group, and modified esophagogastrostomy was used in the improved group to reconstruct His Angle.SPSS 25.0 was used for data analysis.Measurement data such as perioperative indicators and total score of RDQ were expressed with (x± s ).Independent sample t test was used for comparison.The statistical data of complication rate, Visick score grade and RE severity grade were expressed by [cases (%)], and compared by χ2 test or Rank Sum test.P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in operation time, digestive tract reconstruction time, number of lymph nodes dissection, intraoperative blood loss, intestinal function recovery time and postoperative hospitalization time between the improved group and the traditional group (P>0.05).The overall incidence of complications in the improved group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (22.2%vs. 40.7%, P<0.05).The Visick score and the distribution of RE severity in the improved group were better than those in the traditional group, and the total score of RDQ was significantly lower than that in the traditional group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).

Conclusion

LPG combined with modified esophagogastrostomy to reconstruct His Angle is safe and feasible, does not increase perioperative related risks, and can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and has significant anti-reflux effect, so it is a relatively ideal operation.

表1 两组患者基线资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组患者并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者术后抗反流效果比较
[1]
Machlowska J, Baj J, Sitarz M, et al.Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology,Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies[ J].Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(11): 4012.
[2]
王静雷,杨一兵,耿云霞,等.1990-2017年中国胃癌发病、患病及死亡状况趋势分析[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2020,28(05): 321-325.
[3]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition)[ J].Gastric Cancer,2023, 26(1): 1-25.
[4]
臧潞,李树春,郑民华.腹腔镜胃癌外科手术30年:感悟与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2023, 43(09): 975-980.
[5]
欧雷,罗之谦,陈旺文,等.改良食管残胃吻合术在近端胃切除术治疗食管胃结合部癌中预防反流的临床效果[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(04): 403-406.
[6]
李根,郑于强,努尔波力·臣打尔,等.腹腔镜His角重建术与Dor胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的疗效对比分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2022, 27(12): 881-884.
[7]
中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社.中华医学会胃癌临床诊疗指南(2021版)[ J].中华医学杂志,2022, 102(16):1169-1189.
[8]
周家琛,郑荣寿,庄贵华,等.2000-2015年中国肿瘤登记地区胃癌发病趋势及年龄变化[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2020,34(01): 1-5.
[9]
Nunobe S, Ida S.Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review[ J].Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2020, 4(5): 498-504.
[10]
Zhao L, Ling R, Chen J, et al.Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].Dig Surg, 2021,38(1): 1-13.
[11]
赵国栋,施喆,孙树刚,等.两种消化道重建方案的腹腔镜近端胃切除术后患者胃内压变化的对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023, 17(03): 292-295.
[12]
Bonavina L.Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery[ J].Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(10): 907.
[13]
Zhang R, Li Z, Li C, et al.Effect of laparoscopic angle of His reconstruction in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia[ J].Chin Med J (Engl), 2022,135(14): 1750-1752.
[14]
Sun KK, Wu YY.Current status of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy in proximal gastric cancer: Technical details and oncologic outcomes[ J].Asian J Surg, 2021, 44(1): 54-58.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[7] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[8] 王兴, 文阳辉, 姚戈冰, 郭平学, 杨自华. ICG荧光腹腔镜下胆囊切除术的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 663-666.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 白浪, 张雪玉, 白铁成, 贺爱军. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中圆锥形重叠吻合成形术对Siewert Ⅱ型AEG患者胃食管反流、营养状态的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
[11] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[12] 王万里, 郭兵, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-.
[13] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-.
[14] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-.
[15] 卓文锋, 曾桂芳, 杨思加, 赵家立, 邹宝嘉, 白子锐, 林恩, 李坚. 腹腔镜巨脾切除术:逐步打破的手术壁垒[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 783-788.
阅读次数
全文


摘要