切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 618 -621. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.06.023.

所属专题: 文献

论著

联合血管切除重建的胰腺癌根治术对胰腺癌患者并发症发生率及生存质量的影响
刘婷1, 张灿1, 谢萍1,()   
  1. 1. 225001 江苏扬州,江苏省苏北人民医院肝胆胰中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-04 出版日期:2019-12-26
  • 通信作者: 谢萍

Influence of radical operation for pancreatic cancer combined with vascular resection and reconstruction on the incidence of complications and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer

Ting Liu1, Can Zhang1, Ping Xie1,()   

  1. 1. Hepatic Biliary Pancreatic Center, Jiangsu Province North Jiangsu People’s Hospital, 225001
  • Received:2019-03-04 Published:2019-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Ping Xie
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Xe Ping, Email:
引用本文:

刘婷, 张灿, 谢萍. 联合血管切除重建的胰腺癌根治术对胰腺癌患者并发症发生率及生存质量的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 618-621.

Ting Liu, Can Zhang, Ping Xie. Influence of radical operation for pancreatic cancer combined with vascular resection and reconstruction on the incidence of complications and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 618-621.

目的

评价联合血管切除重建的胰腺癌根治术对胰腺癌患者并发症发生率及生存质量的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2015年5月至2018年5月接受胰腺癌根治术的145例胰腺癌患者临床资料,依据术中是否应用血管切除重建分为A组(无血管切除,n=77)、V组(静脉切除重建,n=58)、O组(动脉切除重建,n=10)三组。采用SPSS 24.0软件进行数据处理,手术相关指标、生存质量及生存时间等计量资料以(±s)表示,组间比较t检验,多组间比较通过单因素方差分析;并发症等组间比较通过χ2检验。检验水准α=0.05,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

O组手术时间、术中出血量、输血率及并发症发生率>V组>A组(P<0.05);三组术后6个月健康状况调查简表(SF-36)比术前升高(P<0.05),但三组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);三组术中均无死亡病例,A组、V组及O组中位生存时间分别为(16.2±1.5)个月、(15.3±1.2)个月、(14.2±1.9)个月,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

胰腺癌根治术术中联合动、静脉切除均存在手术时间长、出血量多、并发症发生率高等不足,但可获得与无血管切除重建相近的生存时间、预后及生存质量;故在符合手术指征下应推荐无血管切除重建。

Objective

To evaluate the influence of radical operation for pancreatic cancer combined with vascular resection and reconstruction on the incidence of complications and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 145 pancreatic cancer patients with radical operation for pancreatic cancer from May 2015 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the intraoperative vascular resection and reconstruction, all patients were divided into A group (non-vascular resection, n=77), V group (venous resection and reconstruction, n=58) and O group (arterial resection and reconstruction, n=10). SPSS 24.0 software was used for data processing. The surgical indexes, quality of life and survival time were expressed as (±s). The t test was adopted between groups, the one-way analysis of variance was adopted among groups; The χ2 test was adopted to compare the complications among groups. α=0.05, P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, blood transfusion volume and the incidence of complications in O group were higher than those in V group and A group (P<0.05); After surgery for 6 months, the scores of short form-36 health status questionnaire (SF-36) in the three groups were higher than those before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference among the three groups (P>0.05); There was no dead cases in the three groups during surgery, the median survival time of A group, V and O group were (16.2±1.5) months, (15.3±1.2) months, (14.2±1.9) months, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Radical operation for pancreatic cancer combined with arterial and venous resection has shortcomings such as long operation time, high bleeding volume and high incidence of complications, but it can obtain similar survival time, prognosis and quality of life with non-vascular resection and reconstruction. Therefore, vascular resection and reconstruction can be recommended in accordance with the indications for surgery.

表1 145例胰腺癌根治术患者不同血管重建方式三组患者基本资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 145例胰腺癌根治术患者不同血管重建方式三组手术相关指标对比(±s)
表3 145例胰腺癌根治术患者不同血管重建方式三组并发症发生率对比(例)
表4 145例胰腺癌根治术患者不同血管重建方式三组SF-36评分对比[(±s),分]
[1]
杨永超,李宜雄.胰腺癌外科治疗的历史和现状[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(3): 269-283.
[2]
Nagakawa Y, Hosokawa Y, Sahara Y,et al. Approaching the superior mesenteric artery from the right side using the proximal-dorsal jejunal vein preisolation method during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].Surg Endosc, 2018,32(9): 4044-4051.
[3]
匡天佐,袁荣发,胡昌昌,等.联合血管切除重建的胰腺癌根治术:附12例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2016,25(9): 1242-1246.
[4]
黄斌,陆才德,裘丰,等.联合血管切除重建在胰腺癌根治术中的安全性及价值[J].中华外科杂志,2016,54(1): 56-62.
[5]
中国抗癌协会胰腺癌专业委员会.胰腺癌综合诊治指南(2018版) [J].中华外科杂志,2018,56(7): 481-494.
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组,中华外科杂志编辑部.胰腺术后外科常见并发症预防及治疗的专家共识(2010)[J].中华外科杂志,2010,48(18): 1365-1368.
[7]
Jang ES, Kim YS, Kim KA,et al. Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Korean Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Using the SF-36 and EQ-5D[J]. Gut Liver, 2018, 12(4): 440-448.
[8]
Brown DR, Lanciano R, Heal C,et al. The effect of whole-brain radiation (WBI) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) on survival of patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for second brain metastatic event[J]. J Radiat Oncol, 2017, 6(1): 31-37.
[9]
庄岩,田孝东,高红桥,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(4): 271-274.
[10]
勾善淼,吴河水.胰腺癌根治术淋巴结清扫范围的发展历程[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017,33(1): 57-60.
[11]
Inoue Y, Saiura A, Takahashi Y. A Novel Classification and Staged Approach for Dissection Along the Celiac and Hepatic Artery During Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018,42(9): 2968-2968.
[12]
方向,石刚,麦刚,等.联合血管切除重建在胰腺癌根治术中的临床价值[J].重庆医学,2017,46(18): 2509-2511.
[13]
贾长库,徐孙兵,刘凌,等.联合动脉切除重建的胰腺癌根治性切除2例[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(12): 123-125.
[14]
蒋奎荣,吴鹏飞,苗毅.联合门静脉-肠系膜上静脉切除的胰腺癌根治术[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018,17(7): 692-696.
[15]
Inoue Y, Saiura A, Takahashi Y. A Novel Classification and Staged Approach for Dissection Along the Celiac and Hepatic Artery During Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018,42(9): 2963-2967.
[16]
姚波,谢亮,张光全.胰腺癌根治术联合门静脉切除治疗门静脉受累胰腺癌的近期疗效及远期预后分析[J].解放军医药杂志,2018,30(12): 23-26.
[17]
房炯泽,陆才德,黄斌,等.联合门静脉/肠系膜上静脉切除重建的胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺癌疗效分析[J].现代实用医学,2016,28(2): 167-170.
[18]
王伟林.联合门静脉/肠系膜上静脉切除的胰腺癌根治术[J].中华普通外科杂志,2017,32(9): 725-727.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[4] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[5] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[8] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[9] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[10] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[11] 惠立良, 王成果, 段东峰, 王健. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.
[12] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[13] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
阅读次数
全文


摘要