切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 195 -198. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.02.025

论著

免充气锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术在甲状腺乳头状癌中的应用
常清语1, 冯骋骋2, 刘学敏1,(), 姜一鵾1, 王海强1, 姚昶3   
  1. 1215600 江苏张家港,张家港市中医医院甲乳外科
    2215600 江苏张家港,张家港市中医医院转化医学中心
    3210029 南京,江苏省中医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-29 出版日期:2026-04-26
  • 通信作者: 刘学敏

The application of non-inflatable subclavian approach endoscopic radical thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Qingyu Chang1, Chengcheng Feng2, Xuemin Liu1,(), Yikun Jiang1, Haiqiang Wang1, Chang Yao3   

  1. 1Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhangjiagang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhangjiagang Jiangsu Province 215600, China
    2Centre for Translational Medicine, Zhangjiagang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhangjiagang Jiangsu Province 215600, China
    3Department of Breast Surgery, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing Jiangsu Province 210029, China
  • Received:2025-10-29 Published:2026-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Xuemin Liu
  • Supported by:
    Funding Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(82305115); "National Mentorship System" Talent Cultivation Project of Health Youth Backbone Talent in Suzhou in 2024(Qngg2024033)
引用本文:

常清语, 冯骋骋, 刘学敏, 姜一鵾, 王海强, 姚昶. 免充气锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术在甲状腺乳头状癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 195-198.

Qingyu Chang, Chengcheng Feng, Xuemin Liu, Yikun Jiang, Haiqiang Wang, Chang Yao. The application of non-inflatable subclavian approach endoscopic radical thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 195-198.

目的

探讨免充气锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术对甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者围手术期指标及甲状腺功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2023年4月至2025年4月106例PTC患者的临床资料,根据手术方法分为腔镜手术组(n=55,行免充气锁骨下入路腔镜单侧甲状腺癌根治术)和传统手术组(n=51,行传统开放入路单侧甲状腺癌根治术)。采用χ2检验或t检验比较两组围手术期指标、甲状腺功能、疼痛程度、美学效果、并发症。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腔镜手术组较传统手术组术中出血量少、手术时间长(P<0.05);术后3d,腔镜手术组游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(FT3)及血清游离甲状腺素(FT4)均高于传统手术组,促甲状腺激素(TSH)低于传统手术组(P<0.05);术后1d、3d、7d、1个月,腔镜手术组视觉模拟评分(VAS)均低于传统手术组(P<0.05);术后3个月,两组VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3个月,腔镜手术组患者瘢痕评价量表(PSAS)评分、温哥华瘢痕评估量表(VSS)均低于传统手术组(P<0.05);腔镜手术组和传统手术组患者术后并发症发生率分别为7.3%(4/55)、11.8%(6/51),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

免充气锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术更利于PTC患者术后甲状腺功能的早期恢复,术后疼痛较轻,切口美学效果良好。

Objective

To explore the impact of gasless subclavian approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery on perioperative indicators and thyroid function in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods

The clinical data of 106 PTC patients from April 2023 to April 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the endoscopic surgery group (n=55, undergoing gasless subclavian approach endoscopic unilateral thyroid cancer radical surgery) and the traditional surgery group (n=51, undergoing traditional open approach unilateral thyroid cancer radical surgery). χ2 test or t test was used to compare perioperative indicators, thyroid function, pain degree, aesthetic effect, and complications between the two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The endoscopic surgery group had less intraoperative blood loss and longer operation time than the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). On the third day after surgery, the free triiodothyronine (FT3) and free thyroxine (FT4) levels in the endoscopic surgery group were higher than those in the traditional surgery group, while the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level was lower (P<0.05). On the first, third, seventh day after surgery and one month after surgery, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the endoscopic surgery group were lower than those in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). Three months after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Three months after surgery, the scar assessment scale (PSAS) scores and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) in the endoscopic surgery group were lower than those in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rates in the endoscopic surgery group and the traditional surgery group were 7.3% (4/55) and 11.8% (6/51), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Gasless subclavian approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery is more conducive to the early recovery of thyroid function in PTC patients, with less postoperative pain and good aesthetic effect of the incision.

表1 两组PTC患者一般资料比较
表2 两组PTC患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组PTC患者甲状腺功能比较(±s
表4 两组PTC患者术后疼痛程度比较(分,±s
[1]
李颖胜, 陈利灵, 王亮. circ_0000502靶向miR-1231调控甲状腺乳头状癌TPC-1细胞增殖和凋亡[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2024, 52(02): 187-192.
[2]
朱宗恒, 张志火. 甲状腺乳头状癌对侧中央区淋巴结转移的危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 337-340.
[3]
孙建, 赵明慧, 赵恩春, 等. 经胸乳入路腔镜手术治疗甲状腺癌的临床观察[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 204-207.
[4]
Pradhan S, Fernando DT, Tien A, et al. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA): initial experience in Australia [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2023, 93(3): 545-549.
[5]
Jiang J, He G, Chu J, et al. Single-incision gasless trans-subclavian endoscopic approach thyroidectomy [J]. Updates Surg, 2025, 77(1): 175-182.
[6]
中华医学会内分泌学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组, 中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会, 等. 甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南(第二版) [J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2023, 39(03): 181-226.
[7]
徐骁诚, 华骁帆, 叶建东. 免充气经腋窝胸锁乳突肌肌间入路与经腋窝胸锁乳突肌前缘入路全腔镜甲状腺手术治疗老年甲状腺乳头状癌的临床效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2025, 45(17): 4140-4144.
[8]
高文彩, 王玲, 吴慧敏, 等. 经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术在甲状腺乳头状癌治疗中的应用价值研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2024, 53(03): 344-347.
[9]
张子睿, 张健, 李德伟. 3种手术方式治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床效果比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2024, 45(11): 1408-1411.
[10]
顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 等. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[11]
Sørensen SM, Munk C, Maltesen T, et al. Trends in papillary thyroid cancer mortality in Denmark according to stage and education [J]. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 2024, 0101(6): 573-579.
[12]
季笑语, 邵毅, 余恬湉, 等. 免充气锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺全切除术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的单中心回顾性研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2024, 29(03): 167-173.
[13]
李明闯, 范璇, 陈征, 等. 无充气经锁骨下入路与经腋窝入路及传统开放手术治疗单侧甲状腺癌的临床队列研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2025, 63(07): 611-617.
[14]
李理想, 刘岩岩, 陈浩浩, 等. 免充气经锁骨下后入路腔镜甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床研究[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志(中英文), 2025, 19(01): 51-56.
[15]
刘子靖, 王冰, 姚京, 等. 无充气经锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术治疗单侧甲状腺乳头状癌的临床疗效及学习曲线[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2025, 46(03): 279-286.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 杜峻峰, 吕远, 孙亮. 全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术(Billroth Ⅱ+Braun吻合)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-115.
[3] 燕速, 赵康, 谢宏宇, 霍博文, 梁浩, 李园园, 刘云荣. 无助手减孔腹腔镜SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 116-116.
[4] 戴红梅, 李双喜, 李子禹. 我国腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-107.
[5] 王萌, 管文贤. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治关键技术与质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 108-110.
[6] 李玮璇, 杜峻峰, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治术主要并发症与处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 111-114.
[7] 王瑞, 张建, 乔美美, 闫星宇, 赵世男. 完全腹腔镜经腹经膈肌裂孔入路SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌根治术临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 121-124.
[8] 朱田雨, 施海, 杨洁. 预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 130-133.
[9] 汝干, 翟春涛, 田昳程, 陈正荣. 腹腔镜下不同手术方式治疗cT1N0M0期胃癌的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 134-137.
[10] 李庆, 杜夏宇. 三维重建下3D腹腔镜对低位进展期直肠癌淋巴结清扫术后微炎症及肠黏膜功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 138-141.
[11] 李广鑫, 权慧娟, 高志娟, 李良, 王肖君, 曹玉庆. 腹腔镜急诊切除与支架置入限期切除治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-145.
[12] 范现英, 路萌, 刘晓晴, 张希为, 胡延伟, 连彦军. 腹腔镜结直肠癌切除经不同自然腔道标本取出术治疗女性患者的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 146-149.
[13] 周放, 刘海晨, 王宇超, 郭健, 石志良, 周国强, 沈成龙. "三孔法"腹腔镜手术治疗急性乙状结肠穿孔的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 154-157.
[14] 陈玉, 韩戟, 杨力. CT血管成像对肠系膜下动脉分型评估及腹腔镜直肠癌手术的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 162-165.
[15] 蒋春雷, 崔静, 周晨, 王少军, 魏晓为. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 166-169.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?