切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 130 -133. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.02.009

论著

预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床研究
朱田雨, 施海, 杨洁()   
  1. 710003 西安,西安大兴医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-11 出版日期:2026-04-26
  • 通信作者: 杨洁

Clinical study on laparoscopic radical resection assisted by preoperative small incision for advanced distal gastric gancer

Tianyu Zhu, Hai Shi, Jie Yang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Daxing Hospital, Xi'an Shaanxi Province 710003, China
  • Received:2025-02-11 Published:2026-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Jie Yang
  • Supported by:
    2023 Science and Technology Plan Project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology(2023-JC-YB-786)
引用本文:

朱田雨, 施海, 杨洁. 预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 130-133.

Tianyu Zhu, Hai Shi, Jie Yang. Clinical study on laparoscopic radical resection assisted by preoperative small incision for advanced distal gastric gancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 130-133.

目的

探讨预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性收集2022年2月至2023年11月115例进展期远端胃癌手术患者的临床资料,依据术式不同分为常规组(n=56,行腹腔镜根治术)和研究组(n=59,行预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术)。使用统计学软件SPSS 25.0处理数据,符合正态分布的计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分采用一般线性重复度量方差分析检验;复发时间采用Kaplan-Meier检验;计数资料用[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

研究组患者手术时间短于常规组,术中淋巴结清扫数量多于常规组(P<0.05);两组患者术后下床活动、首次排气及住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6h、12h、24h、48h,两组患者VAS评分均逐渐降低(P<0.05);但术后各时点两组患者VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后并发症总发生率及术后12个月复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组复发患者的复发时间长于常规组(P<0.05)。

结论

预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术可缩短进展期远端胃癌手术时间,提高术中淋巴结清扫数量,且不会增加术后疼痛及并发症,并能保证良好的肿瘤学疗效,有推广应用价值。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection assisted by a preoperative small incision in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 115 patients with advanced distal gastric cancer who underwent surgery from February 2022 to November 2023 were collected retrospectively. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups: Routine Group: 56 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic radical resection; study Group: 59 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection assisted by a preoperative small incision. Data were processed using SPSS 25.0 statistical software. Measurement data conforming to a normal distribution were expressed as (±s) and analyzed by independent samples t test. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were tested by general linear repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Recurrence time was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Categorical data were expressed as [cases (%)] and analyzed by the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time of the Study Group was shorter than that of the Routine Group, and the number of intraoperative lymph node dissections was greater than that of the Routine Group (both P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative time to get out of bed, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay (all P>0.05). At 6h, 12h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively, the VAS scores of both groups decreased gradually (all P<0.05); however, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at each postoperative time point (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the total incidence of postoperative complications or the 12-month postoperative recurrence rate (all P>0.05). The recurrence time of patients with recurrence in the Study Group was longer than that in the Routine Group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic radical resection assisted by a preoperative small incision can shorten the operation time of advanced distal gastric cancer, increase the number of intraoperative lymph node dissections, without increasing postoperative pain and complications, and can ensure good oncological efficacy. It has value for popularization and application.

表1 两组进展期远端胃癌手术患者一般资料对比
表2 两组进展期远端胃癌手术患者手术指标比较(±s
表3 两组进展期远端胃癌手术患者康复指标比较(±s
表4 两组进展期远端胃癌手术患者术后疼痛情况比较(分,±s
图1 两组进展期远端胃癌手术患者复发风险函数图
[1]
李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2]
Li Z, Huang Y, Zhao S, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic distal D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer patients [J]. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino), 2022, 68(4): 492-495.
[3]
Song Y, Zhang Q, Feng Z, et al. The comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 131.
[4]
葛均波, 徐永健, 王辰. 内科学[M]. 第9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 364-367.
[5]
中国腹腔镜胃肠外科研究组(CLASS)中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会, 中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜局部进展期远端胃癌D2根治术标准操作流程:研究共识[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(09): 807-811.
[6]
孙兵, 车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(06): 645.
[7]
佟贵繁, 汤东, 王道荣. 达芬奇机器人手术系统远端胃癌根治术的近期临床疗效[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 517-520.
[8]
阎芳, 李格林, 李德亮, 等. 腹腔镜辅助小切口胃癌根治术对进展期胃癌患者手术相关指标及术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(10): 1702-1705.
[9]
Long VD, Dat TQ, Thong DQ, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for T4a Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2023, 30(4): 2278-2289.
[10]
Ma D, Zhang Y, Shao X, et al. PET/CT for Predicting Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer [J]. Curr Oncol, 2022, 29(9): 6523-6539.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 刘卓, 张宗明, 刘立民, 张翀, 赵月, 齐晖. 胆囊切除术后胆总管结石腹腔镜手术治疗经验[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 18-23.
[3] 郑希彦, 阳德全, 李瑞曦, 陈贤清, 杜飞, 吕芸, 史宪杰, 王少平. 超细胆道镜经胆囊管治疗继发性胆总管结石的疗效与安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 24-29.
[4] 戴红梅, 李双喜, 李子禹. 我国腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-107.
[5] 王萌, 管文贤. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治关键技术与质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 108-110.
[6] 李玮璇, 杜峻峰, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治术主要并发症与处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 111-114.
[7] 樊伟伟, 许怀利, 杨喜佳. 中间入路与左侧前入路在中老年进展期胃癌腹腔镜根治术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 117-120.
[8] 王瑞, 张建, 乔美美, 闫星宇, 赵世男. 完全腹腔镜经腹经膈肌裂孔入路SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌根治术临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 121-124.
[9] 黄家晴, 李福涛, 王婷文, 陶亮, 卞晓洁, 管文贤. 胃癌手术患者肠外营养信息化全程管理的效果评价研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 125-129.
[10] 杜峻峰, 吕远, 孙亮. 全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术(Billroth Ⅱ+Braun吻合)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-115.
[11] 燕速, 赵康, 谢宏宇, 霍博文, 梁浩, 李园园, 刘云荣. 无助手减孔腹腔镜SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 116-116.
[12] 吴燕, 刘瑶. 胃癌患者全胃切除术后不同消化道重建方式的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 83-86.
[13] 刘宗航, 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 嵇振岭. 腹腔镜膈疝修补术的单中心临床经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 37-41.
[14] 刘宝, 苏晓晨, 李广飞, 胥明婧. 超声引导下经皮肝穿刺胆囊引流对急性胆囊炎患者肝功能、胃肠道功能恢复及血清炎症指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 73-78.
[15] 韩静, 李西羊, 张桂芝. 不同浓度罗哌卡因超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在结直肠癌术后镇痛中的效果对比[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 79-85.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?