切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.02.017

论著

CT血管成像对肠系膜下动脉分型评估及腹腔镜直肠癌手术的指导价值
陈玉(), 韩戟, 杨力   
  1. 266100 山东青岛,青岛市第八人民医院东院区普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-15 出版日期:2026-04-26
  • 通信作者: 陈玉

Evaluation of inferior mesenteric artery classification by CT angiography and its guiding value in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery

Yu Chen(), Ji Han, Li Yang   

  1. Department of General Surgery, East Hospital of the Eighth People’s Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao Shandong Province 266100, China
  • Received:2025-02-15 Published:2026-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Yu Chen
引用本文:

陈玉, 韩戟, 杨力. CT血管成像对肠系膜下动脉分型评估及腹腔镜直肠癌手术的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 162-165.

Yu Chen, Ji Han, Li Yang. Evaluation of inferior mesenteric artery classification by CT angiography and its guiding value in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 162-165.

目的

研究CT血管成像(CTA)对肠系膜下动脉分型评估及腹腔镜直肠癌手术的指导价值。

方法

回顾性分析2021年12月至2024年1月195例行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的患者临床资料,行CTA检查的为观察组(n=107),行常规CT检查的为对照组(n=88)。SPSS软件22.0分析数据,数据以(±s)、[M(IQR)]或[例(%)]表示,采用t检验、非参数秩和检验、χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、首次下床时间明显优于对照组,均Cohens |d|>0.8,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后并发症总发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者术中肠系膜血管及其分支情况与术前多层螺旋CT血管成像(MSCTA)检查结果符合率显著高于对照组(100% vs. 90.9%, P<0.05)。观察组Ⅰ-Ⅲ血管分型的患者手术时间与术中出血量均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

直肠癌根治术前施行CTA技术,辅助术者高效规划手术,显著缩短手术时间;助力术前明晰血管分布,术中精准操作以减少出血量;优化手术方案,降低术后并发症发生率,有力促进患者术后康复。

Objective

To study the value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in evaluating the classification of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and guiding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of 195 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer from December 2021 to January 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the examination method: Observation Group: 107 patients who underwent CTA examination; Control Group: 88 patients who underwent conventional CT examination. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. Data were expressed as (±s), [M(IQR)] (median and interquartile range), or [cases (%)] (number of cases and percentage). Statistical tests including t test, nonparametric Rank-Sum test, χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test were used as appropriate. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and time to first ambulation after surgery in the Observation Group were significantly better than those in the Control Group, with Cohen’s |d|>0.8 for all indicators, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the Observation Group was lower than that in the Control Group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The coincidence rate between the intraoperative findings of mesenteric blood vessels and their branches and the preoperative multi-slice spiral computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) results in the Observation Group was significantly higher than that in the Control Group (100% vs. 90.9%, P<0.05). Among patients with IMA classification of Type Ⅰ–Ⅲ, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the Observation Group were lower than those in the Control Group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Performing CTA before radical resection of rectal cancer can assist surgeons in efficiently planning the operation and significantly shortening the operation time; it helps clarify the vascular distribution preoperatively and enables precise intraoperative operation to reduce blood loss; it optimizes the surgical plan, reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, and strongly promotes the postoperative recovery of patients.

表1 两组行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术患者一般资料对比
表2 两组行腹腔镜直肠根治术患者围手术期指标比较
表3 两组行腹腔镜直肠根治术患者不同血管分型与手术情况比较(±s
[1]
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 2. 2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2022, 20(10): 1139-1167.
[2]
Kwik C, El-Khoury T, Pathma-Nathan N, et al. Endoscopic and trans-anal local excision vs. radical resection in the treatment of early rectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2023, 39(1): 13.
[3]
Brillantino A, Skokowski J, Ciarleglio FA, et al. Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Level in Rectal Cancer Surgery beyond Conventions: A Review [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2023, 16(1): 72.
[4]
Cirocchi R, Marchetti F, Mari G, et al. Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 286.
[5]
谢裕强, 庄丹, 林锡汉. 3D腹腔镜右半结肠癌CME术对术前CT成像血管变异患者的临床效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 431-434.
[6]
陈万青, 李霓, 兰平, 等. 中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2020,北京)[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2021, 30(01): 1-28.
[7]
杜晓辉, 冯波, 韩加刚, 等. 中低位直肠癌手术消化道重建中国专家共识(2021版) [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(10): 1081-1089.
[8]
刘骞. 腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中肠系膜下动脉及其主要属支处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(10): 1112-1115.
[9]
王安民, 银明, 王紫薇, 等. 青年与中老年结直肠癌临床病理特征及预后对比的meta分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2025, 54(02): 489-495.
[10]
Zeng S, Wu W, Zhang X, et al. The significance of anatomical variation of the inferior mesenteric artery and its branches for laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer: a review [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2022, 20(1): 290.
[11]
Wu CC, Su CC, Chen YH, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Therapy on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [J]. Anticancer Res, 2024, 44(4): 1619-1628.
[12]
Wu D, Bian L, Chen Y, et al. A pilot study on preoperative vascular anatomy and clinical application in rectal cancer resection [J]. Clin Radiol, 2022, 77(9): 701-707.
[13]
Wang Y, Wang L, Liang M, et al. Verification of blood flow path reconstruction mechanism in distal sigmoid colon and rectal cancer after high IMA ligation through preoperative and postoperative comparison by manual subtraction CTA[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2023, 49(7): 1269-1274.
[14]
赵世栋, 叶颖江, 申占龙. 降结肠旋转不良的解剖特点及其在结直肠癌手术中的临床意义[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2025, 40(02): 158-160.
[15]
Zou J, Jiang X, Feng J, et al. Anatomical variations of the branches from left colic artery and middle colic artery at splenic flexure [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2022, 44(3): 467-473.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 李玮璇, 杜峻峰, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治术主要并发症与处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 111-114.
[3] 王瑞, 张建, 乔美美, 闫星宇, 赵世男. 完全腹腔镜经腹经膈肌裂孔入路SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌根治术临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 121-124.
[4] 朱田雨, 施海, 杨洁. 预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 130-133.
[5] 汝干, 翟春涛, 田昳程, 陈正荣. 腹腔镜下不同手术方式治疗cT1N0M0期胃癌的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 134-137.
[6] 李庆, 杜夏宇. 三维重建下3D腹腔镜对低位进展期直肠癌淋巴结清扫术后微炎症及肠黏膜功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 138-141.
[7] 李广鑫, 权慧娟, 高志娟, 李良, 王肖君, 曹玉庆. 腹腔镜急诊切除与支架置入限期切除治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-145.
[8] 范现英, 路萌, 刘晓晴, 张希为, 胡延伟, 连彦军. 腹腔镜结直肠癌切除经不同自然腔道标本取出术治疗女性患者的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 146-149.
[9] 周放, 刘海晨, 王宇超, 郭健, 石志良, 周国强, 沈成龙. "三孔法"腹腔镜手术治疗急性乙状结肠穿孔的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 154-157.
[10] 南云广, 姜波, 刘伟, 邱正才, 王岐朋, 孙陈波, 舒畅, 李统虎. 基于神经监测的中低位直肠癌TME术中盆腔自主神经及Denonvilliers筋膜解剖学再认识[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 158-161.
[11] 杜峻峰, 吕远, 孙亮. 全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术(Billroth Ⅱ+Braun吻合)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-115.
[12] 燕速, 赵康, 谢宏宇, 霍博文, 梁浩, 李园园, 刘云荣. 无助手减孔腹腔镜SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 116-116.
[13] 戴红梅, 李双喜, 李子禹. 我国腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-107.
[14] 王萌, 管文贤. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治关键技术与质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 108-110.
[15] 阙园, 赵增江, 郑潇, 黄从云, 欧阳再兴, 刘文瑛. 头戴式裸眼3D腔镜显示系统在腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 59-65.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?