切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 317 -320. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.023.

论著

不同路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的近中期疗效比较
曾繁利1, 齐秩凯1, 杨贺庆1,()   
  1. 1. 066600 河北秦皇岛,秦皇岛市第二医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-29 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 杨贺庆
  • 基金资助:
    河北省2023年度医学科学研究课题(20231979)

Comparison of the short-and medium-term efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy via different approaches in the treatment of acute cholecystitis

Fanli Zeng1, Zhikai Qi1, Heqing Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery,Qinhuangdao Second Hospital,Qinhuangdao Hebei Province 066600,China
  • Received:2024-05-29 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Heqing Yang
引用本文:

曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 不同路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的近中期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 317-320.

Fanli Zeng, Zhikai Qi, Heqing Yang. Comparison of the short-and medium-term efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy via different approaches in the treatment of acute cholecystitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 317-320.

目的

探究不同路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗急性胆囊炎的近中期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年1月150例接受LC治疗的急性胆囊炎患者临床资料,根据手术路径不同分为改良组与传统组,传统组行常规顺行性切除方法(n=75例),改良组行循“A-B-D”路径切除(n=75例)。采用SPSS 27.0统计学软件处理数据,围手术期各项指标等计量资料采用(±s)表述,行独立样本t检验;术后并发症、中转开腹率等计数资料[例(%)]表述,采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

改良组患者中转开腹率、术中胆管损伤率分别为(2.7%、2.7%)明显低于传统组(12.0%、13.3%)(P<0.05);两组患者腹腔感染、胆瘘以及出血发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);改良组患者残余结石伴胆囊炎发生率(2.7%)明显低于传统组(13.3%)(P<0.05)。

结论

相较于常规顺行性切除,循“A-B-D”路径能有效降低LC患者胆管损伤率、中转开腹率与残余结石伴胆囊炎发生率。

Objective

To explore the short-and medium-term efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) via different approaches in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Methods

The clinical data of 150 patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent LC treatment from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different surgical approaches,they were divided into the modified group and the traditional group.The traditional group underwent routine antegrade resection (n=75 cases),and the modified group underwent resection along the “A-B-D” approach (n=75 cases).The statistical software SPSS 27.0 was used to process the data.Measurement data such as various perioperative indexes were expressed as (±s),and the independent sample t test was performed.Count data such as postoperative complications and the conversion rate to open surgery were expressed as[ cases (%)],and the χ2 test was used.A P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The conversion rate to open surgery and the intraoperative bile duct injury rate in the modified group were (2.7%,2.7%) respectively,which were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (12.0%,13.3%) (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of abdominal cavity infection,bile leakage and bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05).The incidence of residual stones accompanied by cholecystitis in the modified group (2.7%) was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (13.3%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the routine antegrade resection,resection along the “A-B-D” approach can effectively reduce the bile duct injury rate,the conversion rate to open surgery and the incidence of residual stones accompanied by cholecystitis in LC patients.

表1 两组行LC的急性胆囊炎患者一般资料比较
表2 两组行LC的急性胆囊炎患者临床指标比较
表3 两组行LC的急性胆囊炎患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 两组行LC的急性胆囊炎患者随访结果比较[例(%)]
[1]
纪凯伦,郝少龙,孙海涛,等.减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志电子版,2024,18(01):100-103.
[2]
耿彪,魏屹,陈忠.经脐单孔法与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗结石性胆囊炎的疗效对比研究[J].国际外科学杂志,2022,49(01): 46-51.
[3]
王浩龙,李增辉,何万民,等.早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术在急性胆囊炎中的应用研究[J].中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(06):715-717.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科专家工作组,周迪,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管及血管损伤防范中国专家共识(2024版[)J].中国实用外科杂志,2024,44(03): 244-253,258.
[5]
蒋康怡,高峰畏,雷泽华,等.循“A-B-D”路径的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性化脓性和坏疽性胆囊炎的对比研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2022,29(01): 67-71.
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组.急性胆道系统感染的诊断和治疗指南(2021版)[J].中华外科杂志,2021,59(06):422-429.
[7]
Apfelbaum JL,ConnisRT.The American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice ParameterMethodology[J].Anesthesiology,2019,130(3): 367-384.
[8]
中国研究型医院学会加速康复外科专业委员会,中国日间手术合作联盟.胆道外科日间手术规范化流程专家共识(2018版[)J].中华外科杂志,2018,56(5):321-327.
[9]
谢青云,高峰畏,雷泽华,等.循A-B-D路径改良腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床效果研究[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2021,33(02):65-69.
[10]
Esmer AC,Çolak T,Edizsoy A,et al.Current status of laparoscopic surgery usage in Türkiye:A middle-income country[J].Turk J Surg,2022,38(4): 353-361.
[11]
Thangavelu A,Rosenbaum S,Thangavelu D.Timing of Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis[J].J Emerg Med,2018,54(6): 892-897.
[12]
郭文洁,朱安龙.从解剖学角度认识腹腔镜胆囊切除术中安全性关键术野的价值[J].中国实用外科杂志,2021,41(07):832-834,836.
[13]
鲁鑫,许佳怡,刘洋,等.早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023,17(06): 648-650.
[14]
Di Martino M,Ielpo B,Pata F,et al.Timing of Cholecystectomy After Moderate and Severe Acute Biliary Pancreatitis[J].JAMA Surg,2023,158(10): e233660.
[15]
Yuksekdag S,Bas G,Okan I,et al.Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis[J].Niger J Clin Pract,2021,24(2): 156-160.
[1] 李玉庆, 王刚, 李强, 李云川, 杜明新. 不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 286-289.
[2] 卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.
[3] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[4] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[5] 李国防, 陈凯, 管文贤, 刘颂. 消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-165.
[6] 李贞贞, 王宏刚, 崔丽丽, 缪月琴, 刘万璐. 改良管状胃—食管吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃切除消化道重建中的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 176-179.
[7] 吉林霞, 范小春, 梁琴. 胃癌常见术后并发症类型及危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 220-223.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[11] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[14] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[15] 卢德虎, 樊融, 黄梅, 刘世博, 唐茂盛. 腹膜后副神经节瘤的临床特征及外科诊治分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(10): 901-905.
阅读次数
全文


摘要