切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 321 -324. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.024.

论著

老年患者开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效研究
南李刚1, 王君妍2, 武曦2, 伍晓晶2, 梁姣3, 关蕾4, 段降龙2,()   
  1. 1. 710068 西安,陕西省人民医院肝胆外科
    2. 710068 西安,陕西省人民医院普外二科
    3. 710068 西安,陕西省人民医院病案管理科
    4. 710068 西安,陕西省人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-22 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 段降龙
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划(2020GXLH-Y-019,2022KXJ-141)陕西省创新能力支撑计划(2019GHJD-14,2021TD-40)陕西省人民医院科技人才支持计划(2021LJ-05)陕西省人民医院科技人才支持计划(2022JY-29)

Clinical efficacy study of open preperitoneal tension-free herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy in elderly patients

Ligang Nan1, Junyan Wang2, Xi Wu2, Xiaojing Wu2, Jiao Liang3, Lei Guan4, Xianglong Duan2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatological Surgery,Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital,Xi'an Shaanxi Province 710068,China
    2. Department of General Surgery,Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital,Xi'an Shaanxi Province 710068,China
    3. Department of medical record Management,Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital,Xi'an Shaanxi Province 710068,China
    4. Department of Ultrasound,Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital,Xi'an Shaanxi Province 710068,China
  • Received:2024-04-22 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Xianglong Duan
引用本文:

南李刚, 王君妍, 武曦, 伍晓晶, 梁姣, 关蕾, 段降龙. 老年患者开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 321-324.

Ligang Nan, Junyan Wang, Xi Wu, Xiaojing Wu, Jiao Liang, Lei Guan, Xianglong Duan. Clinical efficacy study of open preperitoneal tension-free herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 321-324.

目的

探讨老年患者开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效研究。

方法

选取 2015年1月至 2017年11月行手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者233例,按照术式不同分为开放手术组(n=117例)和腔镜手术组(n=116例)。使用 SPSS21.0统计软件进行数据分析,围手术期各项指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;单因素和多因素分析采用Logistics回归分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

开放手术组患者手术时间、麻醉时间、术后排气时间、术后排便时间和住院费用较腔镜手术组患者明显缩短或减少(P<0.05)。开放手术组患者术后并发症恶心呕吐、谵妄、肠麻痹和肠梗阻发生率明显低于腔镜手术组患者(P<0.05)。通过单因素分析发现,手术时间≥100min、腔镜手术方式是影响术后远期肠梗阻发生的影响因素,多因素分析发现,腔镜手术方式不是独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术更适宜老年患者,术后近远期并发症发生率低,修补效果等同于腔镜手术,且经济,易于掌握,适合基层医疗机构推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of open preperitoneal tension-free herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 233 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgical treatment from January 2015 to November 2017 were selected.According to different surgical methods,they were divided into the open surgery group(n=117 cases) and the laparoscopic surgery group (n=116 cases).The statistical software SPSS21.0 was used for data analysis.Measurement data such as various perioperative indexes were expressed as (±s),and independent samples t test was used; counting data such as postoperative complications were analyzed by chisquare test; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Logistics regression analysis.A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time,anesthesia time,postoperative exhaust time,postoperative defecation time and hospitalization cost of the patients in the open surgery group were significantly shorter or lower than those of the patients in the laparoscopic surgery group (P<0.05).The incidences of postoperative complications such as nausea and vomiting,delirium,ileus and intestinal obstruction in the open surgery group were significantly lower than those in the laparoscopic surgery group(P<0.05).Through univariate analysis,it was found that the operation time ≥ 100 min and the laparoscopic surgical method were influencing factors for the occurrence of long-term postoperative intestinal obstruction.Multivariate analysis showed that the laparoscopic surgical method was not an independent risk factor (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Open preperitoneal tension-free herniorrhaphy is more suitable for elderly patients.It has a low incidence of both short-term and long-term postoperative complications.The repair effect is equivalent to that of laparoscopic surgery.It is economical,easy to master,and suitable for promotion in primary medical institutions.

表1 两组腹股沟疝手术患者基线资料比较
图1 矢状位示意腹膜前间隙 图2 水平位示意腹膜前间隙
图3 示意补片放置平面
表2 两组腹股沟疝手术患者围手术期各项指标比较(±s
表3 两组腹股沟疝手术患者术后近远期并发症比较(例)
表4 两组腹股沟疝手术患者术后肠梗阻发生单因素分析
表5 术后肠梗阻发生的多因素分析
[1]
阿卜杜萨拉木·阿卜杜合力力,麦麦提艾力,赵新生,等.老年(高龄)病人腹股沟疝无张力修补术研究进展[J].临床外科杂志,2019,27(09): 816-818.
[2]
唐健雄,李航宇.老年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2019版)解 读[J].临 床 外 科 杂 志,2020,28(01): 12-15.
[3]
Reistrup H,Fonnes S,Rosenberg J.Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review[J].Hernia,2021,25(5): 1121-1128.
[4]
李健文,王明刚,唐健雄,等.腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(05):505-512.
[5]
田文,杨晓冬.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023,17(06): 595-597.
[6]
Gong K,Zhang N,Lu Y,et al.Comparison of the open tensionfree mesh-plug,transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP),and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J].Surg Endosc,2011,25(1): 234-239.
[7]
Patel VH,Wright AS.Controversies in Inguinal Hernia[J].Surg Clin North Am,2021,101(6): 1067-1079.
[8]
唐健雄,李绍杰.不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023,17(06): 591-594.
[9]
Rana G,Armijo PR,Khan S,et al.Outcomes and impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair versus open inguinal hernia repair on healthcare spending and employee absenteeism[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(2): 821-828.
[10]
Haladu N,Alabi A,Brazzelli M,et al.Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials[J].Surg Endosc,2022,36(7): 4685-4700.
[11]
Haque MR,Rahman MS,Hossain MS,et al.Comparison between Lichtenstein And Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitonial (TEP)Tension Free Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia[J].Mymensingh Med J,2022,31(4): 1128-1134.
[12]
薛同敏,张培建,刘新颜,等.腹腔镜疝修补术后补片侵蚀引起肠梗阻一例[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(03): 294-295.
[13]
曾江东,司徒升,莫健文.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后内疝致肠梗阻1例报告[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2019,24(07): 557-559.
[14]
牟永华,张阳,周龙,王旭林.腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术后内疝并肠梗阻1例报告[J].中国实用外科杂志,2013,33(08):714-715.
[15]
臧鸣,孙程程,王晶,杨福全.不同麻醉方式在腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及疼痛感受[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2020,14(03): 274-276.
[16]
Nutley MT,Mulloy RH,Hagen N.Minimal postoperative pain using properitoneal nontension sutured repair of direct inguinal hernias[J].Am J Surg,2006,191(4): 479-482.doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.030.
[1] 余磊, 魏寇准, 刘志刚, 陈光彬, 王志. 不同手术入路对腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 361-365.
[2] 阮华, 夏青萍, 李劲平. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对患者术后应激反应及疼痛的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 629-632.
[3] 司仙科, 次仁多吉, 姚子涵, 于昆, 郑侃, 华蕾, 张计训, 杨佳华. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 122-125.
[4] 冒卫华. 完全剥离疝囊与横断处理疝囊在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 456-460.
阅读次数
全文


摘要