切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 254 -257. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.007.

论著

不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比
卢超1, 陈波1, 邢志祥1, 周鹏1, 王帅1,()   
  1. 1. 434020 湖北荆州,湖北省荆州市长江大学附属荆州医院肝胆胰脾外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-20 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 王帅
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生健康委员会项目(WJ2019H222)

Clinical comparison of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma under different approaches

Chao Lu1, Bo Chen1, Zhixiang Xing1, Peng Zhou1, Shuai Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreaticospleen Surgery,Jingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University,Jingzhou Hubei Province 434020,China
  • Received:2024-06-20 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Shuai Wang
引用本文:

卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.

Chao Lu, Bo Chen, Zhixiang Xing, Peng Zhou, Shuai Wang. Clinical comparison of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma under different approaches[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.

目的

对比沿肝静脉主干入路与传统入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年12月确诊并接受腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术的112例肝细胞癌患者资料,根据手术入路不同分为肝静脉组(n=56例,经肝静脉主干入路)和传统组(n=56例,经传统入路)。应用统计学软件SPSS 25.0处理数据,围手术期指标、肝功能指标等计量资料以(±s)描述,组内行配对样本t检验,组间行独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料以频数和百分比描述,行χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

肝静脉组患者手术时间短于传统组,术中出血量少于传统组(P<0.05);术后7d,两组患者丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)较术前升高,但肝静脉组低于传统组(P<0.05);传统组与肝静脉组患者术后并发症总发生率(12.5% vs. 7.1%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

肝细胞癌患者采取沿肝静脉主干入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗,较传统入路手术时间短、术中出血量少,且能减少手术操作对肝功能的损伤,安全性好。

Objective

Compare the clinical application effects of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma via the approach along the main trunk of the hepatic vein and the traditional approach.

Methods

Retrospectively analyze the data of 112 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were diagnosed and underwent laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy from January 2021 to December 2023.According to the different surgical approaches,they were divided into the hepatic vein group(n=56 cases,via the approach along the main trunk of the hepatic vein) and the traditional group (n=56 cases,via the traditional approach).The statistical software SPSS 25.0 was used to process the data.Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and liver function indexes were described as (±s).The paired sample t test was performed within the group,and the independent sample t test was performed between the groups.Count data such as the postoperative complications were described by frequency and percentage,and the χ2 test was performed.A P value less than 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The operation time of patients in the hepatic vein group was shorter than that in the traditional group,and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the traditional group (P<0.05).Seven days after the operation,the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in both groups increased compared with those before the operation,but the levels in the hepatic vein group were lower than those in the traditional group (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of major postoperative complications between the traditional group and the hepatic vein group (12.5% vs. 7.1%)(P>0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy via the approach along the main trunk of the hepatic vein has a shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with the traditional approach.Moreover,it can reduce the damage to liver function caused by surgical procedures and has good safety.

表1 两组行腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术患者一般资料比较
表2 两组行腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组行腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术患者肝功能指标比较(U/L,±s
表4 两组行腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术患者术后并发症情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
杨河,符敏,王琳,等.解剖性肝切除术对肿瘤直径≤2cm合并微血管瘤栓(MVI)的肝细胞癌患者临床疗效及预后影响研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(06): 605-609.
[2]
Tao H,Fang C,Yang J.ASO Author Reflections: Laparoscopic Anatomical Segment 8 Resection Using Digital Intelligent Liver Surgery Technologies: The Combination of Multiple Navigation Approaches [J].Ann Surg Oncol,2023,30(12): 7388-7390.
[3]
Zeng X,Zhu W,Lin W,et al.Laparoscopic Anatomical Extended Right Posterior Sectionectomy Using Virtual Liver Segment Projection Navigation and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2023,30(1): 375-376.
[4]
冯涛,詹兴云,林斯锋.三种不同入路在腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用价值回顾性分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(01): 72-75.
[5]
王清,高峰畏,刘宇,等.肝圆韧带裂入路在再次肝切除手术中的应用[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2021,28(02): 155-159.
[6]
龚杰,高峰畏,雷泽华,等.沿肝静脉主干入路的开腹解剖性肝脏切除术治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及安全性[J].现代肿瘤医学,2023,31(14): 2666-2672.
[7]
王耀明,秦军,覃军,等.腹腔镜与传统开腹手术对肝细胞癌短期治疗效果的临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2021,27(06):12-18.
[8]
葛均波,徐永健,王辰.内科学(第9版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 416-418.
[9]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌中国专家共识(2020版[)J].中华消化外科杂志,2020,19(11): 1119-1134.
[10]
黄靖波,刘亚晖,李智,等.尾侧入路腹背侧联合显露肝中静脉在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性半肝切除中的应用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2022,28(03): 198-201.
[11]
尤楠,李靖,吴柯,等.腹腔镜下以肝中静脉为引导的肝实质优先入路解剖性肝脏S8段切除的临床应用价值[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2021,28(02): 146-150.
[12]
凌福生,连志刚,游恩龙,等.基于倾向评分匹配法比较开腹肝切除术与腹腔镜下肝静脉导向解剖性肝切除术治疗左外叶肝细胞癌的效果[J].广西医学,2023,45(14): 1658-1663.
[13]
陈雪芳,熊子慧,叶青,等.经Glisson鞘左、右半肝血流阻断法在腹腔镜解剖性肝中叶切除术中的应用[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2023,35(01): 25-29.
[14]
Chiba N,Abe Y,Ochiai S,et al.Exposure of the hepatic vein trunk via tracing of its branches: a useful surgical procedure for laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2023,408(1): 278.
[15]
Liao C,Wang D,Huang L,et al.A new strategy of laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy guided by the middle hepatic vein combined with transhepatic duct lithotomy for complex hemihepatolithiasis: A propensity score matching study[J].Surgery,2021,170(1): 18-29.
[16]
肖亮,周乐杜.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术入路选择[J].中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(01): 9-15.
[17]
蒋彬,沈正超,方小三,等.循肝静脉入路的腹腔镜肝中叶上区肿瘤切除[J].皖南医学院学报,2023,42(05): 458-460,476.
[1] 沈锋, 王葵, 刘建伟. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术治疗现状、问题与发展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 237-240.
[2] 蔡建强, 毕新宇, 徐博文. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术的难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 241-244.
[3] 张小松, 马俊永, 李锡锋, 施乐华, 沈锋. 腹腔镜鞘内解剖性右半肝切除联合区域淋巴结清扫[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 245-245.
[4] 母德安, 张志远, 张伟. 提线木偶单孔腹腔镜下胆囊切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 246-246.
[5] 肖建, 肖天保, 陈江, 杨桃, 何峰, 保甜甜, 曹一波, 杨琴, 赵颖. 吲哚菁绿成像技术在保留左结肠动脉的直肠癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-137.
[6] 金芳, 徐东飞, 尚培中, 张伟, 葛艳丽, 李晓英, 苗建军, 郭伟林. 腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术选择性应用超声刀和电钩的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 142-145.
[7] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[8] 何可可, 顾海扬, 肖姝, 韦琪, 李鑫玉. 腹腔镜保留回盲部右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 149-152.
[9] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[10] 韦洋, 赵远权, 王小波, 黄海, 陈洁. BCLC 0/A期肝细胞癌患者术后辅助治疗后早期复发风险分析及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 157-161.
[11] 李国防, 陈凯, 管文贤, 刘颂. 消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-165.
[12] 李贞贞, 王宏刚, 崔丽丽, 缪月琴, 刘万璐. 改良管状胃—食管吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃切除消化道重建中的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 176-179.
[13] 张海雄, 吴显博, 罗发. 腹腔镜荧光正染S7段肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 508-508.
[14] . 腹腔镜左半肝切除+胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 509-509.
[15] 曾勇超, 唐荣, 李启进, 张震生. 腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头次全切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 510-510.
阅读次数
全文


摘要