切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.02.013.

论著

消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型的建立
李国防1, 陈凯1, 管文贤1,(), 刘颂1,()   
  1. 1.210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院普通外科胃外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-26 出版日期:2025-04-26
  • 通信作者: 管文贤, 刘颂
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82172645)江苏省科技计划(重点研发计划社会发展)项目(BE2022667)

Establishment of mouse model of postoperative anastomotic leakage of digestive tract

Guofang Li1, Kai Chen1, Wenxian Guan1,(), Song Liu1,()   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Division of Gastric Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu Province 21008, China
  • Received:2024-03-26 Published:2025-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Wenxian Guan, Song Liu
引用本文:

李国防, 陈凯, 管文贤, 刘颂. 消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-165.

Guofang Li, Kai Chen, Wenxian Guan, Song Liu. Establishment of mouse model of postoperative anastomotic leakage of digestive tract[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 162-165.

目的

构建消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型。

方法

2023年6月至2023年12月将30只C57BL/6小鼠随机分为两组:对照组6只,仅做剖腹探查;实验组24只,从结肠无血管区剪破肠管并结扎供应此段的血管,然后进行吻合,记录手术时间。于术后2d行剖腹探查小鼠腹腔内部形态学变化,并采集吻合口周围组织,进一步观察吻合口漏组织学的变化。应用Image J和Graph Pad Prism 9.5软件进行数据统计分析。两组间比较采用独立样本 t检验,以 P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

该模型构建平均时间为25min,小鼠的存活率为75%。亚甲蓝灌注实验显示肠管存在漏口。剖腹探查,肉眼可见吻合口存在轻微粘连,粘连部分可分离,肠管有漏口形成。与对照组比较,实验组苏木精-伊红染色可见吻合口有肌层不连续现象。Western Blot技术显示同一部位组织炎症因子在蛋白水平的表达差异明显。F4/80免疫组化显示在肌层断裂位置可见大量巨噬细胞浸润。

结论

通过该方法可成功构建消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型。

Objective

The mouse model of postoperative anastomotic leakage of digestive tract was established.

Methods

From June 2023 to December 2023, 30 C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into two groups: 6 mice in the control group were performed laparotomy only; In the experimental group of 24, the intestinal tube was cut from the vascularized area of the colon and the blood vessels supplying this section were ligation, then anastomosis was performed, and the operation time was recorded.Two days after operation,a laparotomy was performed to investigate the morphological changes in the abdominal cavity of the mice, and the tissues around the anastomosis were collected to further observe the histological changes of the anastomotic leakage.Image J and Graph Pad Prism 9.5 software were used for statistical analysis.Independent sample t test was used for comparison between the two groups, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The average construction time of the model was 25min, and the survival rate of the mice was 75%.Methylene blue perfusion test showed leakage of intestinal tube.Laparotomy exploration showed that there was slight adhesion in the anastomosis, the adhesion part could be separated, and there was leakage in the intestinal tube.Compared with the control group, hematoxylin-eosin staining showed muscle discontinuity at the anastomosis in the experimental group.Western Blot showed that the expression of inflammatory factors in the same part of the tissue was significantly different at the protein level.F4/80 immunohistochemistry showed a large number of macrophage infiltrates at the site of muscle break.

Conclusion

Through this method, a mouse model of postoperative anastomotic leakage of digestive tract can be successfully constructed.

图1 构建消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型具体流程 注:A 为备皮消毒后切开皮肤、肌肉、腹膜进腹;B 为结扎供应手术区肠管的血管;C 为垂直于肠道纵轴剪开肠组织,圆圈所示为剪开的破口;D 为吻合肠破口,圆圈所示为吻合处;E 为关腹
图2 造模后2d 结肠吻合口漏大体观及亚甲蓝灌注试验结果 注:A 为漏口大体观,示漏口;B 为从肛门注入少量亚甲蓝溶液;C 为增加注入亚甲蓝,吻合口处有蓝色液体溢出;D 为继续注入亚甲蓝溶液,吻合口处溢出的蓝色液体随之增加
图3 造模后2d 病理及Western Blot 结果 注:A 为肠管横切面苏木精-伊红染色;B 为组织总蛋白Western Blot 结果;C 为吻合口漏部位免疫组化(F4/80)结果;Normal Colon 为正常组;AL 为实验组
[1]
周雄, 胡明, 李子帅, 等.2020年全球及中国结直肠癌流行状况分析[J].海军军医大学学报, 2022, 43(12): 1356-1364.
[2]
Degiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer(RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group [J].Colorectal Dis, 2022, 24(3): 264-276.
[3]
Denicu MM, Cârțu D, Râmboiu S, et al.Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery: Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Options [J].Curr Health Sci J, 2023, 49(3): 333-342.
[4]
Chiarello MM, Fransvea P, Cariati M, et al.Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery [J].Surg Oncol, 2022, 40: 101708.
[5]
Tsalikidis C, Mitsala A, Mentonis VI, et al.Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery:Where Are We and Where Are We Going?[J].Curr Oncol, 2023,30(3): 3111-3137.
[6]
童院生, 姜宝, 郑涛, 等.2015年~2020年老年直肠癌患者术后吻合口漏的高危因素分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 56-58.
[7]
万源, 徐峰, 杜俊东.结直肠癌术后吻合口瘘的危险因素及预防的研究进展 [J].现代消化及介入诊疗, 2023, 28(09): 1179-1184.
[8]
李婷, 杨学文.肠壁水肿及肿瘤病灶纤维化对腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术后吻合口漏的影响[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 328-331.
[9]
余向南, 付达安, 戴拯, 等.直肠癌前切除术吻合口漏预防及治疗[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05):587-590.
[10]
石三保, 段福孝, 单永琪, 等.亚甲蓝灌注试验与充气试验在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术吻合口质量检测中比较研究[J].临床军医杂志, 2023, 51(06): 561-563, 569.
[11]
Rudnicki Y, White I, Tiomkin V, et al.Intraoperative evaluation of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a comparison of air leak and dye leak tests[ J].Techniques in coloproctology, 2021, 25(7):841-847.
[12]
Kryzauskas M, Degutyte AE, Abeciunas V, et al.Experimental Study of Mechanical Integrity Testing in Stapled Large Bowel:Methylene Blue Leak Test Is Not Inferior to Air Leak Test[ J].Visc Med, 2021, 37(3): 189-197.
[13]
Anderson DI, Keskey R, Ackerman MT, et al.Enterococcus faecalis Is Associated with Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery[ J].Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2021,22(10): 1047-1051.
[14]
Yu K, Chen Z.Risks of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal cancer after operation and how to effectively avoid it[J].Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2021, 46(9): 1031-1040.
[15]
Ryska O, Kalvach J, Pazin J, et al.Surface Microdialysis for Detection of Colorectal Anastomosis Ischemia-An Experimental Study[ J].J Surg Res, 2021, 261: 293-300.
[16]
张中华, 刘扬, 毛伟明, 等.ICG显影技术辅助吻合口血运判断在保留左结肠动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中临床意义研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06):688-691.
[17]
Helwa N, Sharma M, Vanama MS, et al.Colonic Anastomotic Leak Model in Swin[J].Eur Surg Res, 2023, 64(4): 406-411.
[1] 黄晋杰, 李奕男, 王彩琴, 黄晓卉, 王荣昌. 结直肠癌肺转移术后复发性肺转移治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 50-54.
[2] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[3] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[12] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[13] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[14] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[15] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
阅读次数
全文


摘要