切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 286 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.015.

论著

不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响
李玉庆1, 王刚1,(), 李强1, 李云川1, 杜明新1   
  1. 1. 063000 河北唐山,唐山职业技术学院附属医院(唐山市协和医院)
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-14 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 王刚
  • 基金资助:
    河北省2021年度医学科学研究课题(20210941)

Influence of different anastomosis techniques on patients undergoing laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy

Yuqing Li1, Gang Wang1,(), Qiang Li1, Yunchuan Li1, Mingxin Du1   

  1. 1. Affiliated Hospital of Tangshan Vocational & Technical College (Tanshan Union Hospital),Tangshan Hebei Province 063000,China
  • Received:2024-08-14 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Gang Wang
引用本文:

李玉庆, 王刚, 李强, 李云川, 杜明新. 不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 286-289.

Yuqing Li, Gang Wang, Qiang Li, Yunchuan Li, Mingxin Du. Influence of different anastomosis techniques on patients undergoing laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 286-289.

目的

探究不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2022年9月至2023年4 月110例腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者资料,根据吻合方式不同分为非离断组(行非离断Roux-en-Y吻合)与毕Ⅱ组(行BillrothⅡ+ Braun吻合),倾向性匹配排除基线资料混杂因素,两组各得55例患者。采用SPSS22.0软件分析数据。术后并发症、反流情况等计数资料以[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验或秩和检验;围手术期指标、肠道屏障指标、生存期等计量资料以(±s)表示,行独立样本t检验。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

非离断组患者手术时间、术中出血量显著高于毕Ⅱ组(P<0.05);非离断组患者并发症发生率(3.6%)与毕Ⅱ组(12.7%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3d,肠道屏障功能指标两组患者D-乳酸、二胺氧化酶(DAO)水平显著提高(P<0.05),且非离断组显著高于毕Ⅱ组(P<0.05);非离断组患者胆汁反流及反流性胃炎情况显著优于毕Ⅱ组(P<0.05);随访1年,两组患者无进展生存期(PFS)(Log-Rankχ2=0.529,P=0.467),两组患者总生存期(OS)(Log-Rankχ2=0.339,P=0.560),差异均无统计学意义。

结论

非离断Roux-en-Y吻合与BillrothⅡ+ Braun吻合术均可有效重建腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者消化道,非离断Roux-en-Y吻合在改善胃肠道功能、抗反流等方面更具优势。

Objective

To explore the influence of different anastomosis techniques on patients undergoing laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy.

Methods

The data of 110 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy from September 2022 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different anastomosis methods,they were divided into the non-transection group (undergoing nontransection Roux-en-Y anastomosis) and the Billroth II group (undergoing Billroth II + Braun anastomosis).Propensity matching was used to exclude confounding factors in the baseline data,and 55 patients were obtained in each group.The SPSS22.0 software was used for data analysis.Count data such as postoperative complications and the situation of reflux were expressed as[ cases (%)],and the χ2 test or Rank Sum test was performed.Measurement data such as perioperative indexes,intestinal barrier indexes,and survival periods were expressed as (±s),and the independent sample t test was carried out.A P value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of patients in the non-transection group were significantly higher than those in the Billroth II group (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the non-transection group (3.6%) and the Billroth II group (12.7%) (P>0.05).Three days after surgery,the levels of D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase(DAO),which were indexes of intestinal barrier function,increased significantly in both groups (P<0.05),and the levels in the non-transection group were significantly higher than those in the Billroth II group (P<0.05).The situations of bile reflux and reflux gastritis in patients of the non-transection group were significantly better than those in the Billroth II group (P<0.05).After 1-year follow-up,there were no statistically significant differences in the progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (Log-Rankχ2=0.529,P=0.467)and in the overall survival (OS) between the two groups (Log-Rankχ2=0.339,P=0.560).

Conclusion

Both non-transection Roux-en-Y anastomosis and Billroth II + Braun anastomosis can effectively reconstruct the digestive tract of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy.Non-transection Roux-en-Y anastomosis has more advantages in aspects such as improving gastrointestinal function and anti-reflux.

表1 两组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者一般临床资料比较
表2 两组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者围手术期指标对比(±s
表3 两组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者并发症对比[例(%)]
表4 两组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者肠道屏障功能对比(±s
表5 两组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者术后反流情况对比[例(%)]
图1 两组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者1 年生存曲线
[1]
Huang C,Liu H,Hu Y,et al.Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Tria[lJ].JAMA Surg,2022,157(1): 9-17.
[2]
Postolov MP,Kovalenko NV,Zhavoronkova VV,et al.Laparoscopic subtotal distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer[J].Khirurgiia,2021,1(8): 34-38.
[3]
Jiang H,Li Y,Wang T.Comparison of Billroth I,Billroth II,and Roux-en-Y reconstructions following distal gastrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J].Cir Esp,2021,99(6): 412-420.
[4]
李仕发,冉文华,黄自铎,等.不同消化道重建方式用于远端胃癌根治术3年随访比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(05): 541-544.
[5]
李勇,范立侨.胃癌[M].科技文献出版社,2010: 125,165.
[6]
中华医学会消化病学分会.2020年中国胃食管反流病专家共识[J].中华消化杂志,2020,40(10): 649-663.
[7]
Yalikun A,Ma J,Zheng M,et al.ASO Author Reflections:Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Modified Billroth-II with Braun Reconstruction Could Be Technically Feasible and Effective in Preventing Bile Reflux[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2022,29(4): 2368-2369.
[8]
王本泉,张毅,项本宏.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术+Braun吻合术在进展期胃癌中的应用研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(04): 399-402.
[9]
余璠.不同吻合方式在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中的疗效和安全性[J].临床与病理杂志,2023,43(02): 287-294.
[10]
李辉,惠广学,申永东,等.Billroth Ⅱ与Roux-en-Y吻合对胃癌全腹腔镜远端胃切除术临床结局的影响[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2023,28(08): 568-573.
[11]
叶小双,林夏,刘佳佳,等.腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术非离断Roux-en-Y吻合与毕Ⅱ+Braun吻合的临床疗效及生活质量的比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2022,25(02): 166-172.
[12]
王衡兵,胡立平,吴家伟,等.Roux-en-Y术式重建消化道对胃癌的疗效及术后并发症的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2022,25(05): 394-396.
[13]
马乐,穆艾太尔·麦提努日,艾斯克尔·吐拉洪,等.核黄素对胃癌化疗患者消化道黏膜炎的治疗效果及对血清DAO、LPS、DLA水平的影响[J].河北医药,2023,45(05): 679-683.
[14]
Wang YY,Fu HJ.Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer[J].World J Gastrointest Surg,2023,15(10): 2171-2178.
[15]
丁战伟,李志彬,崔广飞,等.三种不同术式在腹腔镜胃癌根治术消化道重建中的应用[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2022,29(01): 60-64.
[16]
陈徽,朱晓明,罗振凌,等.胃癌根治术后3种胃肠道重建术式的治疗效果及并发症的比较[J].天津医药,2022,50(10):1066-1071.
[1] 陈思敏, 毛杰, 杜潇利, 张树泽. CT 与生物电阻抗法测定胃癌患者骨骼肌质量的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 28-33.
[2] 卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.
[3] 李华志, 孙海涛, 曹广, 张雅静. 基于膜解剖的完整系膜切除+D2根治术在进展期胃癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 262-265.
[4] 汪志翔, 何战洋. 不同淋巴结清扫术在No.16淋巴结局限性转移的局部进展期胃癌中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 266-269.
[5] 申昌军, 刘文奇. 不同食管空肠重建方法在胃癌患者TLTG术食管空肠吻合术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 270-273.
[6] 马海龙, 吴少锋, 王茂, 陈学锋, 代引海. 腹腔镜近端胃切除不同消化道重建围手术期安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 274-277.
[7] 李鹏, 刘光世, 李涛. 基于黑色素瘤相关抗原A6在胃癌转移与预后的作用机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 282-284.
[8] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[9] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[10] 李国防, 陈凯, 管文贤, 刘颂. 消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-165.
[11] 艾世超, 孙艺文, 宋鹏, 沈晓菲, 刘颂, 孙锋, 陆晓峰, 王萌, 管文贤. 静脉注射吲哚菁绿导航胃癌根治术的单臂开放前瞻性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 166-169.
[12] 李贞贞, 王宏刚, 崔丽丽, 缪月琴, 刘万璐. 改良管状胃—食管吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃切除消化道重建中的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 176-179.
[13] 邓崇文, 廖喜望, 施幼雄, 龚俊, 钟洪. 腹腔镜下胃癌D2根治+腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 180-183.
[14] 薛林强, 戈军刚, 高林, 钱雷敏, 黄建明. 改良SPLT食管-空肠吻合术在腹腔镜全胃切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 212-215.
[15] 吉林霞, 范小春, 梁琴. 胃癌常见术后并发症类型及危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 220-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要