切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 676 -679. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.06.024

论著

以盆腔自主神经和固有筋膜为解剖标志的保留盆腔自主神经TME术对比研究
李甫根1,(), 罗文君1, 钱川1, 孙萌1, 许政文1   
  1. 1. 629000 四川遂宁,遂宁市中心医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-29 出版日期:2022-12-26
  • 通信作者: 李甫根

Comparative study of pelvic autonomic nerve TME with pelvic autonomic nerve and intrinsic fascia as anatomical markers

Fugen Li1,(), Wenjun Luo1, Chuan Qian1, Meng Sun1, Zhengwen Xu1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Suining City Central Hospital,Suining Sichuan Province 629000,China
  • Received:2021-05-29 Published:2022-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Fugen Li
  • Supported by:
    Technical Promotion Project for Health Matters in Sichuan Province(19SYJS32); Sichuan Medical Research Project(S19015)
引用本文:

李甫根, 罗文君, 钱川, 孙萌, 许政文. 以盆腔自主神经和固有筋膜为解剖标志的保留盆腔自主神经TME术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 676-679.

Fugen Li, Wenjun Luo, Chuan Qian, Meng Sun, Zhengwen Xu. Comparative study of pelvic autonomic nerve TME with pelvic autonomic nerve and intrinsic fascia as anatomical markers[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 676-679.

目的

探究以盆腔自主神经和固有筋膜为解剖标志的保留盆腔自主神经全直肠系膜切除(TME)术在中低位直肠癌中的应用效果。

方法

前瞻性选取2018年4月至2020年12月行TME+保留盆腔自主神经(PANP)术的中低位直肠癌男性患者98例,按照随机数字表法分为自主神经组和固有筋膜组,每组49例。自主神经组术中操作以自主神经层面为解剖学标志,固有筋膜组以固有筋膜为解剖学标志。采用软件SPSS 19.0进行统计学分析。围手术期各项指标等计量资料以(

xˉ
±s)表示,独立样本t检验分析;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;排尿功能分级、性功能分级等等级计数资料采用非参数秩和检验分析。以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

自主神经组患者术后首次通气时间短于固有筋膜组(P<0.05);自主神经组患者排尿功能和性勃起功能优于固有筋膜组(P<0.05)。自主神经组总并发症发生率为10.2%,低于固有筋膜组的16.3%,但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对中低位直肠癌男性患者行TME术时以自主神经层面为解剖标志,可更大程度保留盆腔自主神经,减少患者排尿功能和性功能损伤,具有一定应用价值。

Objective

To explore the effect of pelvic autonomic nerve sparing total mesorectal resection(TME)with pelvic autonomic nerve and intrinsic fascia as anatomical markers in middle and low rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 98 male patients with moderate and low rectal cancer who underwent TME+pelvic autonomic nerve preservation(PANP)from April 2018 to December 2020 were prospectively selected and randomly divided into the autonomic nerve group and the inherent fascia group according to the numerical method,with 49 cases in each group. The intraoperative operation of the autonomic nerve group was marked by the autonomic nerve layer,and that of the intrinsic fascia group was marked by the intrinsic fascia. SPSS19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Perioperative indicators and other measurement data were represented by(

xˉ
±s)and analyzed by independent t test;χ2 test was used for counting data of postoperative complications. Nonparametric rank sum test was used to analyze the count data of voiding function and sexual function. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The first postoperative ventilation time of the autonomic nerve group was shorter than that of the intrinsic fascia group(P<0.05),Urinary function and erectile function in the autonomic nerve group were better than those in the intrinsic fascia group(P<0.05). The incidence of total complications in the autonomic nerve group was 10.2%,which was lower than that in the intrinsic fascia group(16.3%),but the difference between groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).

Conclusion

When TME is performed on male patients with middle and low rectal cancer,the level of autonomic nerve is used as an anatomical marker,which can preserve the pelvic autonomic nerve to a greater extent and reduce the urination function and sexual function injury of patients,which has certain application value.

表1 98例男性中低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
图1 分离乙状结肠系膜,解剖左侧Toldt’s间隙
图3 保留右腹下神经
表2 98例男性中低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者术中相关指标比较(
xˉ
±s)
表3 98例男性中低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 98例男性中低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者术后排尿功能比较[例(%)]
表5 98例男性中低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者术后性功能比较[例(%)]
[1]
刘宗超,李哲轩,张阳,等. 2020全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD]. 肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志20217(2):1-14.
[2]
Bray FFerlay JSoerjomataram I,et al. Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin201868(6):394-424.
[3]
Bjoern MXNielsen SPerdawood SK. Quality of Life After Surgery for Rectal Cancer:a Comparison of Functional Outcomes After Transanal and Laparoscopic Approaches[J]. J Gastrointest Surg201923(8):1623-1630.
[4]
曾涛. 保留盆腔自主神经的全直肠系膜切除术治疗女性直肠癌患者的临床疗效分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科201824(4):340-343.
[5]
Rubinkiewicz MNowakowski MWierdak M,et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer:A case-matched study comparing tatme versus standard laparoscopic TME[J]. Cancer Manag Res201810:5239-5245.
[6]
Ishii MShimizu ALefor AK,et al. Reappraisal of the lateral rectal ligament:an anatomical study of total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis201833(6):763-769.
[7]
卫洪波,方佳峰. 基于膜解剖理念的保留邓氏筋膜全直肠系膜切除术[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202023(7):666-669.
[8]
丁鹏,谢方利,刘海科,等. 保留自主神经的腹腔镜直肠癌切除术效果研究及腹膜后自主神经的筋膜解剖学观察[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(1):35-38.
[9]
Heald RJHusband EMRyall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrencerecurrence[J]. Br J Surg198269(10):613-616.
[10]
丁平军,罗曦. 低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术中保留盆腔自主神经的临床价值[J]. 实用癌症杂志201732(8):1334-1337.
[11]
Watanabe JIshibe ASuwa H,et al. Surgical Techniques for Identification of the Prostate Gland Using the Autonomic Nerve as a Landmark During Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision:Secure Dissection of the Male Rectourethral Muscle[J]. Dis Colon Rectum201861(8):999-1000.
[12]
王波,袁帅,陶蓓蓓,等. 腹腔镜下全直肠系膜切除术对中晚期直肠癌患者外周血免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床201919(1):38-40.
[13]
Liu JHuang PLiang Q,et al. Preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia for nerve-sparing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision:A neuro-histological study[J]. Clin Anat201932(3):439-445.
[14]
Baca BBenlice COzben V,et al. Totally Robotic Autonomic Nerve-Preserving Total Mesorectal Excisions:Step-by-Step Technical Tips and Tricks[J]. Dis Colon Rectum202063(4):562.
[15]
韩方海,钟广宇. 直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术中保护盆腔自主神经的技术路径[J]. 临床外科杂志202028(5):412-415.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[12] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要