切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 672 -675. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.06.023

论著

结直肠癌纤维结肠镜下测量距离与病变位置的关系
封益飞1, 张冬生1, 王晓伟1, 王勇1, 胥子玮1, 张翼1, 唐俊伟1, 黄远健1, 张川1, 孙跃明1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-11 出版日期:2022-12-26
  • 通信作者: 孙跃明

Relationship between distance and lesion location under fibercolonoscopy in colorectal cancer

Yifei Feng1, Dongsheng Zhang1, Xiaowei Wang1, Yong Wang1, Ziwei Xu1, Yi Zhang1, Junwei Tang1, Yuanjian Huang1, Chuan Zhang1, Yueming Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing Jiangsu Province 210029,China
  • Received:2022-08-11 Published:2022-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Yueming Sun
  • Supported by:
    The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFC0908200(AH17))
引用本文:

封益飞, 张冬生, 王晓伟, 王勇, 胥子玮, 张翼, 唐俊伟, 黄远健, 张川, 孙跃明. 结直肠癌纤维结肠镜下测量距离与病变位置的关系[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 672-675.

Yifei Feng, Dongsheng Zhang, Xiaowei Wang, Yong Wang, Ziwei Xu, Yi Zhang, Junwei Tang, Yuanjian Huang, Chuan Zhang, Yueming Sun. Relationship between distance and lesion location under fibercolonoscopy in colorectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 672-675.

目的

探讨结直肠癌术前纤维结肠镜下病变距肛缘距离的测量与病变位置的关系。

方法

回顾性收集2013年1月至2020年12月期间5031例接受结直肠癌手术患者的临床资料。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行数据分析,计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示;计量资料非正态分布数据,采用中位数MP25,P75)表示,两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,采用Bonferroni法校正显著性水平的事后两两比较。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

纤维结肠镜下测量各部位肿瘤距肛缘的距离分布如下:盲肠70(65,75)cm、升结肠70(60,75)cm、肝曲70(60,75)cm、横结肠60(50,70)cm、脾曲50(40,60)cm、降结肠40(35,50)cm、乙状结肠21.5(18.5,30)cm、直肠8(5,11.5)cm。不同部位病变距肛缘的距离差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.001)。经过两两比较发现,右半结肠各部位肿瘤所测距离之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

术前纤维结肠镜所测肿瘤距肛缘的距离无法严格区分各个部位肿瘤的分布。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the measurement of the distance between the lesion and the anal margin and the lesion location under fibercolonoscopy in colorectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 5031 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from January 2013 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. SPSS 25.0 software was used for data analysis,and count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. The median MP25,P75)was used to represent non-normally distributed measurement data. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between two groups,Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison between multiple groups,and Bonferroni method was used to correct for pairwise comparison of significance level. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The distance distribution between the tumor and the anal margin was measured by fiber colonoscopy as follows:Cecum 70(65,75)cm,ascending colon 70(60,75)cm,liver curvature 70(60,75)cm,transverse colon 60(50,70)cm,splenic curvature 50(40,60)cm,descending colon 40(35,50)cm,sigmoid colon 21.5(18.5,30)cm,rectum 8(5,11.5)cm . There were significant differences in the distance between the lesions of different parts and the anal margin(P<0.001). After pairwise comparison,there was no significant difference between the measured distances of tumors in each part of the right colon(P>0.05).

Conclusion

The distance between the tumor and the anal margin measured by fiber colonoscopy before surgery cannot strictly distinguish the distribution of tumors in various parts.

图1 5031例不同部位结直肠癌术前纤维结肠镜下所测不同部位肿瘤距肛缘距离的分布情况
表1 5031例不同部位结直肠癌术前纤维结肠镜下所测不同部位肿瘤距肛缘距离的分布情况
[1]
Sung HFerlay JSiegel RL,et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202171(3):209-249.
[2]
Bronzwaer MESDepla ACTMvan Lelyveld N,et al. Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program[J]. Gastrointest Endosc201989(1):1-13.
[3]
Spada CKoulaouzidis AHassan C,et al. Colonoscopy quality across Europe:a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation(ECQI)Group[J]. Endosc Int Open20219(10):E1456-E1462.
[4]
Doubeni CACorley DAQuinn VP,et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer:a large community-based study[J]. Gut201867(2):291-298.
[5]
曹毛毛,陈万青. 中国恶性肿瘤流行情况及防控现状[J]. 中国肿瘤临床201946(3):145-149.
[6]
Shi JFWang LRan JC,et al. Clinical Characteristics,Medical Service Utilization,and Expenditure for Colorectal Cancer in China,2005 to 2014:Overall Design and Results From a Multicenter Retrospective Epidemiology from survey[J]. Cancer2021127(11):1880-1893.
[7]
Franco DLLeighton JAGurudu SR. Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy:New echniques and Technologies[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol(N Y)201713(8):476-483.
[8]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志202058(8):561-585.
[9]
刘思德,姜泊,周殿元. 大肠镜常见的结袢及解除袢曲的方法[J]. 中国消化内镜20071(9):33-37.
[10]
Quero CGaliandro FHassan C,et al. Colonoscopy quality assessment and accuracy:analysis of the influencing factors and surgical sequelae on 216 colonoscopies[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci201923(6):2532-2538.
[11]
Hounnou GDestrieux CDesmé J,et al. Anatomical study of the length of the human intestine[J]. Surg Radiol Anat200224(5):290-294.
[12]
Duncan JEMcNally MPSweeney WB,et al. CT Colonography Predictably Overestimates Colonic Length and Distance to Polyps Compared With Optical Colonoscopy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2009193(5):1291-1295.
[13]
Costi RRicco' MNegrini G,et al. Is CT Scan more Accurate than Endoscopy in Identifying Distance from the Anal Verge for Left Sided Colon Cancer?A Comparative Cohort Analysis[J]. J Invest Surg202033(3):273-280.
[14]
刘立刚,刘务华,姚鹏飞,等. 结肠肿瘤术前经内镜注射染色剂定位的临床应用进展[J].中华消化内镜杂志201633(12):894-896.
[15]
Blum-Guzman JPde Melo Jr SW. Location of colorectal cancer:colonoscopy versus surgery. Yield of colonoscopy in predicting actual location[J]. Endosc Int Open20175(7):E642-E645.
[16]
Letarte FWebb MRaval M,et al. Tattooing or not?A review of current practice and outcomes for laparoscopic colonic resection following endoscopy at a tertiary care centre[J]. Can J Surg201760(6):394-398.
[17]
Dekker ERex DK. Advances in CRC Prevention:Screening and Surveillance[J]. Gastroenterology2018154(7):1970-1984.
[18]
Gallo G. Preoperative Colorectal-Cancer Detection:Do We Need Anything Else?An Invited Brief Commentary on Is CT Scan More Accurate than Endoscopy in Identifying Distance from the Anal Verge for Left-sided Colon Cancer?A Comparative Cohort Analysis[J]. J Invest Surg202033(3):281-282.
[1] 罗青杉, 梅海涛, 郝家领, 蔡锦锋, 周润楷, 温玉刚. 连接蛋白43通过调控细胞周期抑制结直肠癌的增殖机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 344-349.
[2] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[3] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[4] 施烨鑫, 马翔, 鲁明, 夏青城, 王鹏超, 宋青雨, 赵庆洪. 腹腔镜下结直肠肿瘤定位研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 463-466.
[5] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[6] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[7] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[8] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[9] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[10] 张蔚林, 王哲学, 白峻阁, 黄忠诚, 肖志刚. 利用TCGA数据库构建基于miRNA的结直肠癌列线图预后模型[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 381-388.
[11] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[12] 任佳琪, 刁德昌, 何自衍, 张雪阳, 唐新, 李文娟, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江. 网膜融合线导向的脾曲游离技术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 362-367.
[13] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[14] 季鹏程, 鄂一民, 陆晨, 喻春钊. 循环外泌体相关生物标志物在结直肠癌诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 265-273.
[15] 谢娜, 纪东旭, 刘晨, 徐峰. 肩肱距离在肩痛患者诊断和治疗决策中的作用:一项回顾性的病例对照研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 326-331.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?