切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 672 -675. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.06.023

论著

结直肠癌纤维结肠镜下测量距离与病变位置的关系
封益飞1, 张冬生1, 王晓伟1, 王勇1, 胥子玮1, 张翼1, 唐俊伟1, 黄远健1, 张川1, 孙跃明1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-11 出版日期:2022-12-26
  • 通信作者: 孙跃明

Relationship between distance and lesion location under fibercolonoscopy in colorectal cancer

Yifei Feng1, Dongsheng Zhang1, Xiaowei Wang1, Yong Wang1, Ziwei Xu1, Yi Zhang1, Junwei Tang1, Yuanjian Huang1, Chuan Zhang1, Yueming Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing Jiangsu Province 210029,China
  • Received:2022-08-11 Published:2022-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Yueming Sun
  • Supported by:
    The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFC0908200(AH17))
引用本文:

封益飞, 张冬生, 王晓伟, 王勇, 胥子玮, 张翼, 唐俊伟, 黄远健, 张川, 孙跃明. 结直肠癌纤维结肠镜下测量距离与病变位置的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 672-675.

Yifei Feng, Dongsheng Zhang, Xiaowei Wang, Yong Wang, Ziwei Xu, Yi Zhang, Junwei Tang, Yuanjian Huang, Chuan Zhang, Yueming Sun. Relationship between distance and lesion location under fibercolonoscopy in colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 672-675.

目的

探讨结直肠癌术前纤维结肠镜下病变距肛缘距离的测量与病变位置的关系。

方法

回顾性收集2013年1月至2020年12月期间5031例接受结直肠癌手术患者的临床资料。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行数据分析,计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示;计量资料非正态分布数据,采用中位数MP25,P75)表示,两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,采用Bonferroni法校正显著性水平的事后两两比较。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

纤维结肠镜下测量各部位肿瘤距肛缘的距离分布如下:盲肠70(65,75)cm、升结肠70(60,75)cm、肝曲70(60,75)cm、横结肠60(50,70)cm、脾曲50(40,60)cm、降结肠40(35,50)cm、乙状结肠21.5(18.5,30)cm、直肠8(5,11.5)cm。不同部位病变距肛缘的距离差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.001)。经过两两比较发现,右半结肠各部位肿瘤所测距离之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

术前纤维结肠镜所测肿瘤距肛缘的距离无法严格区分各个部位肿瘤的分布。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the measurement of the distance between the lesion and the anal margin and the lesion location under fibercolonoscopy in colorectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 5031 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from January 2013 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. SPSS 25.0 software was used for data analysis,and count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. The median MP25,P75)was used to represent non-normally distributed measurement data. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between two groups,Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison between multiple groups,and Bonferroni method was used to correct for pairwise comparison of significance level. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The distance distribution between the tumor and the anal margin was measured by fiber colonoscopy as follows:Cecum 70(65,75)cm,ascending colon 70(60,75)cm,liver curvature 70(60,75)cm,transverse colon 60(50,70)cm,splenic curvature 50(40,60)cm,descending colon 40(35,50)cm,sigmoid colon 21.5(18.5,30)cm,rectum 8(5,11.5)cm . There were significant differences in the distance between the lesions of different parts and the anal margin(P<0.001). After pairwise comparison,there was no significant difference between the measured distances of tumors in each part of the right colon(P>0.05).

Conclusion

The distance between the tumor and the anal margin measured by fiber colonoscopy before surgery cannot strictly distinguish the distribution of tumors in various parts.

图1 5031例不同部位结直肠癌术前纤维结肠镜下所测不同部位肿瘤距肛缘距离的分布情况
表1 5031例不同部位结直肠癌术前纤维结肠镜下所测不同部位肿瘤距肛缘距离的分布情况
[1]
Sung HFerlay JSiegel RL,et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202171(3):209-249.
[2]
Bronzwaer MESDepla ACTMvan Lelyveld N,et al. Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program[J]. Gastrointest Endosc201989(1):1-13.
[3]
Spada CKoulaouzidis AHassan C,et al. Colonoscopy quality across Europe:a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation(ECQI)Group[J]. Endosc Int Open20219(10):E1456-E1462.
[4]
Doubeni CACorley DAQuinn VP,et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer:a large community-based study[J]. Gut201867(2):291-298.
[5]
曹毛毛,陈万青. 中国恶性肿瘤流行情况及防控现状[J]. 中国肿瘤临床201946(3):145-149.
[6]
Shi JFWang LRan JC,et al. Clinical Characteristics,Medical Service Utilization,and Expenditure for Colorectal Cancer in China,2005 to 2014:Overall Design and Results From a Multicenter Retrospective Epidemiology from survey[J]. Cancer2021127(11):1880-1893.
[7]
Franco DLLeighton JAGurudu SR. Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy:New echniques and Technologies[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol(N Y)201713(8):476-483.
[8]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志202058(8):561-585.
[9]
刘思德,姜泊,周殿元. 大肠镜常见的结袢及解除袢曲的方法[J]. 中国消化内镜20071(9):33-37.
[10]
Quero CGaliandro FHassan C,et al. Colonoscopy quality assessment and accuracy:analysis of the influencing factors and surgical sequelae on 216 colonoscopies[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci201923(6):2532-2538.
[11]
Hounnou GDestrieux CDesmé J,et al. Anatomical study of the length of the human intestine[J]. Surg Radiol Anat200224(5):290-294.
[12]
Duncan JEMcNally MPSweeney WB,et al. CT Colonography Predictably Overestimates Colonic Length and Distance to Polyps Compared With Optical Colonoscopy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2009193(5):1291-1295.
[13]
Costi RRicco' MNegrini G,et al. Is CT Scan more Accurate than Endoscopy in Identifying Distance from the Anal Verge for Left Sided Colon Cancer?A Comparative Cohort Analysis[J]. J Invest Surg202033(3):273-280.
[14]
刘立刚,刘务华,姚鹏飞,等. 结肠肿瘤术前经内镜注射染色剂定位的临床应用进展[J].中华消化内镜杂志201633(12):894-896.
[15]
Blum-Guzman JPde Melo Jr SW. Location of colorectal cancer:colonoscopy versus surgery. Yield of colonoscopy in predicting actual location[J]. Endosc Int Open20175(7):E642-E645.
[16]
Letarte FWebb MRaval M,et al. Tattooing or not?A review of current practice and outcomes for laparoscopic colonic resection following endoscopy at a tertiary care centre[J]. Can J Surg201760(6):394-398.
[17]
Dekker ERex DK. Advances in CRC Prevention:Screening and Surveillance[J]. Gastroenterology2018154(7):1970-1984.
[18]
Gallo G. Preoperative Colorectal-Cancer Detection:Do We Need Anything Else?An Invited Brief Commentary on Is CT Scan More Accurate than Endoscopy in Identifying Distance from the Anal Verge for Left-sided Colon Cancer?A Comparative Cohort Analysis[J]. J Invest Surg202033(3):281-282.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[5] 薛永婷, 高峰, 王雅楠, 屈莲平. 溶瘤病毒治疗在结直肠癌中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 380-384.
[6] 武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[7] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[9] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[10] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[11] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[12] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[13] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[14] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[15] 孙昕, 程海波, 沈卫星. 基于全转录组学探讨仙连解毒方治疗Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的疗效机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要