切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 643 -646. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.06.016

论著

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症中对脾蒂血管的不同处理方式比较
张菊梅1, 黄玉荣2, 王迪迪1, 李强3, 吴霞1, 杨杰4,()   
  1. 1. 550001 贵阳,贵州医科大学
    2. 553000 贵州六盘水,六盘水市人民医院消化内科
    3. 550081 贵阳,贵阳市第二人民医院普外科
    4. 550025 贵阳,贵州医科大学附属医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-18 出版日期:2022-12-26
  • 通信作者: 杨杰

Comparison of different management methods of splenic pedicle vessels in laparoscopic splenectomy for portal hypertension of liver cirrhosis

Jumei Zhang1, Yurong Huang2, Didi Wang1, Qiang Li3, Xia Wu1, Jie Yang4,()   

  1. 1. Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang Guizhou Province 550004,China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology,The People’s Hospital of Liupanshui city,Liupanshui Guizhou Province 553000,China
    3. Department of General Surgery,The Second People’s Hospital of Guiyang,Guiyang Guizhou Province 550081,China
    4. Department of Gastroenterology,The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang Guizhou Province 550004,China
  • Received:2021-04-18 Published:2022-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Jie Yang
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Fund Project of Guizhou Health Commission in 2020(gzwjkj2020-1-074)
引用本文:

张菊梅, 黄玉荣, 王迪迪, 李强, 吴霞, 杨杰. 腹腔镜脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症中对脾蒂血管的不同处理方式比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 643-646.

Jumei Zhang, Yurong Huang, Didi Wang, Qiang Li, Xia Wu, Jie Yang. Comparison of different management methods of splenic pedicle vessels in laparoscopic splenectomy for portal hypertension of liver cirrhosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 643-646.

目的

比较腹腔镜脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症中脾蒂血管的不同处理方式对术后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年9月至2020年2月接受手术治疗的129例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者病例资料,根据术中脾蒂血管处理方式的不同分为A组(n=67例,残留脾动脉长度≥脾静脉)和B组(n=62例,残留脾动脉长度<脾静脉)。采用SPSS 26.0统计分析软件,手术相关指标、术后疼痛情况以(

xˉ
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后门静脉血栓(PVT)发生率采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床时间、术后肠胃减压时间、住院时间相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组患者术后1周门静脉内径、最大流速、血流量均比B组高(P<0.05);A组患者术后PVT发生率10.4%低于B组27.4%(P<0.05)。

结论

对肝硬化门静脉高压症患者采用腹腔镜脾切除术治疗中,残留脾动脉长度不短于脾静脉,可有效改善肝脏血流动力学指标,降低术后PVT发生风险,临床应用价值高。

Objective

To compare the effect of different management methods of splenic pedicle vessels in laparoscopic splenectomy for cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Methods

The clinical data of 129 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who underwent surgical treatment from September 2017 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into group A(n=67,residual splenic artery length ≥ splenic vein)and group B(n=62,residual splenic artery length < splenic vein)according to the different treatment methods of splenic pedicle vessels during operation. SPSS 26.0 statistical analysis software was used. The indexes related to surgery and postoperative pain were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),and independent sample t test was used. The incidence of postoperative portal vein thrombosis(PVT)was analyzed by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative ambulation time,postoperative gastrointestinal decompression time,and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05). The diameter,maximum velocity and blood flow of portal vein in group A were higher than those in group B at 1 week after operation(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative PVT in group A was 10.4% lower than that in group B 27.4%(P<0.05).

Conclusion

In the treatment of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension by laparoscopic splenectomy,the length of residual splenic artery should not be shorter than that of splenic vein,which can effectively improve liver hemodynamic indexes and reduce the risk of postoperative PVT,and has high clinical application value.

表1 129例肝硬化门静脉高压症脾切除脾蒂血管不同处理方式两组患者基线资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 129例肝硬化门静脉高压症脾切除脾蒂血管不同处理方式两组患者围手术期相关指标比较(
xˉ
±s)
表3 129例肝硬化门静脉高压症脾切除脾蒂血管不同处理方式两组患者肝脏血流动力学指标比较(
xˉ
±s)
[1]
许丁伟,孙敏,吴敏,等. 腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的团队协作与技巧[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志201925(8):611-615.
[2]
蒋国庆,柏斗胜,金圣杰,等. 改良保留迷走神经与传统腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志202019(12):1280-1285.
[3]
Bai DSZhou BHQian JJ,et al. Effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection on liver synthesis function and cirrhosis:a 2-year prospective study[J]. Surg Endosc202034(11):5074-5082.
[4]
张华国,郭云虎. 开腹与腹腔镜脾切除分别联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志202028(8):747-750.
[5]
Zhong HJXiao PLin D,et al. Cirrhosis in Wilson Disease is characterized by Impaired Hepatic Synthesis,Leukopenia and Thrombocytopenia[J]. Int J Med Sci202017(10):1345-1350.
[6]
冷希圣. 门静脉高压症--病理生理.诊断与治疗(精)[M]. 人民卫生出版社,2008:1-441.
[7]
车金辉,朱硕,苏展,等. 腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的临床研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志201924(12):911-915.
[8]
Yang SQuan MLi Y,et al. Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease as the Cause of Portal Hypertension in Felty’s Syndrome:A Case Report and Literature Review[J]. BioMed Research International20202020:2618260.
[9]
尹修才,王辉. 腹腔镜巨脾切除治疗肝硬化门静脉高压的效果观察[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(3):314-317.
[10]
汪昱,董科. 改良腹腔镜脾脏切除+贲门周围血管离断术在肝硬化合并门静脉高压症中的应用研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(1):65-68.
[11]
Olevskaya ERDolgushina AITarasov AN,et al. Prognosis factors of survival in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension[J]. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv201991(2):67-72.
[12]
李丹阳. 肝硬化门静脉高压症脾切除术中不同脾蒂血管处理方法对术后门静脉血栓形成的对比研究[J]. 广西医学201941(8):985-987.
[13]
李山山,周元龙,杨季红,等. 脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后门静脉系统血栓形成的危险因素分析[J]. 河北医药201941(7):1046-1050.
[14]
Guadagni SGianardi DMorelli L. Hand-Assisted Splenic Bed Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly Secondary to Portal Hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis[J]. Am Surg201985(5):e271-e272.
[15]
陈智全,刘学军,聂晓辉,等. 改良腹腔镜巨脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践20194(30):95-96.
[16]
黄龙,于庆生,郭彬彬. 肝硬化门静脉高压患者脾切除对血液流变学的影响及血栓形成分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志202026(8):581-584.
[17]
宁克,殷香保. 门静脉高压症行腹腔镜脾切除术后门静脉系统血栓形成预测因子的研究进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志202029(8):1012-1017.
[18]
宋子敏,戴朝六. 肝硬化门脉高压症脾切除术后门静脉系统血栓形成的诊治进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展201922(12):958-962.
[19]
戴朝六,徐锋,金添强. 腹腔镜肝切除:解剖性与非解剖性利弊之我见[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(3):228-231.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[11] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[12] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要