切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 658 -661. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.06.017

论著

腹腔镜超声引导十二指肠镜治疗胆囊合并胆总管结石
王毅, 孔剑桥, 张鹏, 代扬, 李恒平()   
  1. 441000 湖北襄阳,湖北医药学院附属襄阳市第一人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-07 出版日期:2025-12-26
  • 通信作者: 李恒平

Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided duodenoscopy for the treatment of gallbladder combined with common bile duct stones

Yi Wang, Jianqiao Kong, Peng Zhang, Yang Dai, Hengping Li()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Xiang Yang No.1 People’s Hospital, Hubei university of Medicine, Xiangyang Hubei Province 441000, China
  • Received:2024-11-07 Published:2025-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Hengping Li
  • Supported by:
    Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2023EHA052)
引用本文:

王毅, 孔剑桥, 张鹏, 代扬, 李恒平. 腹腔镜超声引导十二指肠镜治疗胆囊合并胆总管结石[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 658-661.

Yi Wang, Jianqiao Kong, Peng Zhang, Yang Dai, Hengping Li. Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided duodenoscopy for the treatment of gallbladder combined with common bile duct stones[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 658-661.

目的

探讨腹腔镜超声辅助经胆囊管导丝引导十二指肠镜治疗胆囊结石伴非扩张胆总管结石的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2020年10月至2023年3月收治的胆囊结石伴非扩张胆总管结石139例患者的临床资料。根据手术方式不同分为研究组(n=73例)和对照组(n=66例),研究组行腹腔镜超声辅助经胆囊管导丝引导十二指肠镜胆总管取石+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC);对照组行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)+LC。采用SPSS 26.0统计软件处理数据。计量资料均为偏态分布,以四分位数MQ1Q3)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U秩和检验,手术前后比较采用Wilcoxon检验;计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,通过χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法进行组间比较。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

研究组患者手术成功率和导丝插管时间均优于对照组(P<0.05),术后高淀粉酶血症和胰腺炎发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者结石残留、胆瘘、十二指肠穿孔比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组患者术后6h血清淀粉酶(AMY)较术前升高(P<0.05),但研究组与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后5d,两组患者血清总胆红素、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)与术前相比均明显降低(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在严格筛选适应证的前提下,腹腔镜超声辅助经胆囊管导丝引导十二指肠镜治疗胆囊结石伴非扩张胆总管结石安全有效。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted guidewire-guided duodenoscopy via the cystic duct in the treatment of gallbladder stones combined with non-dilated common bile duct stones.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 139 patients with gallbladder stones and non-dilated common bile duct stones admitted from October 2020 to March 2023. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into a study group (n=73 cases) and a control group (n=66 cases). The study group underwent laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted guidewire-guided duodenoscopy for common bile duct lithotomy via the cystic duct combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), while the control group underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with LC. Data were processed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software. Measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as quartiles M(Q1, Q3), and intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U Rank Sum test, while pre-and post-surgical comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon test. Enumeration data were expressed as [cases (%)], and intergroup comparisons were made by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact probability method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The study group showed a higher surgical success rate and shorter guidewire intubation time than the control group (P<0.05), with lower incidences of postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in stone residue, bile leakage, or duodenal perforation (P>0.05). The serum amylase (AMY) level in the control group increased at 6 hours postoperatively compared with that before surgery (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed in the study group (P>0.05). At 5 days postoperatively, serum total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in both groups significantly decreased compared with those before surgery (P<0.05), but no significant intergroup differences were found (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Under strict screening of indications, laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted guidewire-guided duodenoscopy via the cystic duct is safe and effective for the treatment of gallbladder stones combined with non-dilated common bile duct stones.

表1 两组胆囊结石伴非扩张胆总管结石患者基线资料比较
图1 手术图片及相应超声影像注:1A,1D为经十二指肠球部后方探查及超声图像特点;1B,1E为经十二指肠球部前方探查及超声图像特点;1C,1F为超声引导下置入导丝及超声图像特点;Duo为十二指肠;Pan为胰腺;GW为斑马导丝;红色箭头为胆总管结石
图2 十二指肠镜下图片注:2A为经胆囊管顺行插入乳头部的导丝;2B为球囊取出结石及泥沙脓性胆汁
图3 LUS在鼻胆管指引下全程显示胆总管各段注:3A为十二指肠腔内;3B为十二指肠乳头部;3C为胰腺段;3D为肝总管段;Duo为十二指肠;NBD为鼻胆管;DP为十二指肠乳头;CBD为胆总管;Pan为胰腺;PV为门静脉;RHA为肝右动脉
表2 两组胆囊结石伴非扩张胆总管结石患者术后生化指标比较[MQ1Q3)]
[1]
Cianci P, Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2021, 27(28): 4536-4554.
[2]
Edebo A, Andersson J, Gustavsson J, et al. Benefits and risks of using laparoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(9): 5096-5107.
[3]
Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, et al. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)[J]. Gut, 2017, 66(5): 765-782.
[4]
史旸, 殷鑫, 田忠. 正常直径胆总管行腹腔镜下胆总管探查一期缝合的安全性及可行性[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2021, 27(03): 197-201.
[5]
宋兴超, 韩亚民, 杨伟斌, 等. 腹腔镜联合超细胆道镜治疗胆囊结石并无胆总管扩张胆总管结石的临床疗效[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2024, 32(12): 1965-1970.
[6]
Manasseh M, Elsamalouty IM, San CN, et al. Exploring Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Literature Review[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(10): e72570.
[7]
Horvath IL, Kleiner D, Nagy R, et al. Nafamostat reduces the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2024, 115(2): 206-212.
[8]
Zhang D, Dai Z, Sun Y, et al. One-Stage Intraoperative ERCP combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Two-Stage Preoperative ERCP Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Management of Gallbladder with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta-analysis [J]. Adv Ther, 2024, 41(10): 3792-3806.
[9]
罗刚, 江帆, 黄子锋, 等. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术联合经腹顺行导丝引导逆行胰胆管造影术取石治疗胆囊结石合并细径胆总管结石的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(05): 466-469.
[10]
中国肝胆外科术中超声学院. 术中超声在胆道外科的应用中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2023, 29(01): 5-14.
[11]
王闯, 周晓华, 谭硕果, 等. EST和EPBD治疗肝外胆管结石的疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 390-393.
[12]
Ye Q, Zhang J, Ou X, et al. Efficacy and safety of three endoscopic techniques for small common bile duct stones (≤ 10 mm): a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study with propensity score matching [J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(3): 1863-1869.
[13]
Chi JY, Ma LY, Zou JC, et al. Risk factors of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary tract diseases [J]. BMC Surg, 2023, 23(1): 62.
[14]
Li YY, Miao YS, Wang CF, et al. Optimal dilation duration of 10 mm diameter balloons after limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 971.
[15]
Deziel DJ. Laparoscopic ultrasound for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy: clinical impact in 785 consecutive cases[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2022, 234(5): 849-860.
[16]
张雯雯, 卢实春, 陈明易, 等. 腹腔镜超声在胆道外科手术中的应用[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(06): 462-465.
[17]
Bush AES, Christopoulos P, Jones RM, et al. Safety, quality and efficiency of intra-operative imaging for treatment decisions in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis without pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(2): 1206-1214.
[1] 袁超, 郑坤, 屈增辉, 喻元, 邓永军, 王薪华. 腕关节镜在桡骨远端关节内骨折内固定的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 499-504.
[2] 韩冰, 毕宇彤, 何达. 衰弱指数与腰椎术后并发症关系的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(03): 233-240.
[3] 周丽君, 李姣姣, 孙燕, 王露, 钱蓉. 不同吻合方式对腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术患者术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 642-645.
[4] 杨敏, 辛林璞, 杜峻峰. 三精准管理方案对直肠癌造口术后造口并发症的预防效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[5] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[6] 地力木热提·艾买提, 于鹏, 丁志翔, 段绍斌. 胆总管直径与肝内Ⅰ、Ⅱ级胆管直径的比值对胆总管结石复发的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 559-561.
[7] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[8] 邓吟咏, 钟洁, 蒋理立, 杨婕. 结直肠肿瘤手术后并发症的预测与预防:基于临床研究的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[9] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[10] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 五定四观察循证方案对直肠癌造口患者生活质量与应用效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 409-412.
[11] 赵燕玲, 王珩, 秦勤, 李静. 不同手术在食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者中的应用观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 421-424.
[12] 李盼, 张华秦. 不同腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 388-391.
[13] 卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.
[14] 程颖慧, 孙娟, 杨冬梅, 朱晓俊, 程鹤, 郝月琴. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术后并发症影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 442-446.
[15] 辛海贝, 李志洲, 白斌, 张海东, 苏显, 张存圳, 隋承军, 丁光辉, 张敏峰. 腹腔镜胆总管切开取石顺行留置鼻胆管一期缝合的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 589-594.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?