切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 574 -577. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.028

论著

完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究
王维花1, 王楠1, 乔庆1, 罗红1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学第二附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-13 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 罗红

A comparative study of two endovascular digestive tract reconstruction schemes for complete laparoscopic right half colon cancer resection

Weihua Wang1, Nan Wang1, Qing Qiao1, Hong Luo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an Shaanxi Province 710038, China
  • Received:2024-03-13 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Hong Luo
引用本文:

王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.

Weihua Wang, Nan Wang, Qing Qiao, Hong Luo. A comparative study of two endovascular digestive tract reconstruction schemes for complete laparoscopic right half colon cancer resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.

目的

探究完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术中两种腔内消化道重建方案的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2021年6月至2023年6月59例右半结肠癌患者的病例资料。根据消化道重建方式不同分为两组。31例患者在消化道重建行逆蠕动“T”形吻合,设为观察组;28例患者在消化道重建行顺蠕动重叠式三角吻合,设为对照组。SPSS 22.0软件统计分析数据。围手术期各项指标和血清炎症因子等计量资料以()表示,行独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料,行χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

59例患者均顺利完成完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术,无中转开腹。观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、吻合时间、术后首次下床时间、首次排气时间均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后3d白介素6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、干扰素-γ(INF-γ)、C反应蛋白(CRP)均较术前增加,但观察组患者均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(9.6% vs. 17.9%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术中行逆蠕动“T”形吻合法较顺蠕动重叠式三角吻合法,可明显缩短消化道重建手术时间,术后机体炎症应激水平降低,利于患者术后恢复,具有安全性和可行性,值得临床进一步推广运用。

Objective

TTo explore the safety and feasibility of two types of endovascular digestive tract reconstruction during complete laparoscopic right hemicolonectomy.

Methods

Data of 59 patients with right colon cancer from June 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to different ways of digestive tract reconstruction. A total of 31 patients underwent retroperistaltic "T" anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction and were set as observation group. 28 patients underwent paracalistaltic overlapping triangular anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction and were set as control group. SPSS 22.0 software analyzed the data statistically. Perioperative indicators and serum inflammatory factors were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was performed. The statistical data of postoperative complications were analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher exact probability method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant..

Results

All 59 patients successfully completed complete laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer without conversion to laparotomy. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomosis time, first time to get out of bed after operation and first exhaust time in observation group were better than those in control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (INF-γ) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in 3 days after surgery were increased in both groups, but the observation group was lower than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in observation group was lower than that in control group (9.6% vs. 17.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In the complete laparoscopic resection of right half colon cancer, the antiperistaltic “T” anastomosis method can significantly shorten the time of digestive tract reconstruction and surgery, and reduce the postoperative inflammatory stress level of the body, which is conducive to postoperative recovery of patients, and is safe and feasible, worthy of further clinical promotion and application.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组患者血清炎症因子比较(
表4 两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
[1]
郑雷振. 腹腔镜下头尾结合入路与完全头侧入路手术治疗右半结肠癌的效果比较[J]. 中国实用医刊2023,50(19):8-11.
[2]
黄彬,田跃,郑辉超,等. 机器人与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠全系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌短中期疗效单中心、单外科医生经验[J]. 中国普通外科杂志2023,32(04):497-505.
[3]
Lu SMa FZhang Z,et al. Various Kinds of Functional Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy[J]. Front Oncol2021,11:685717.
[4]
Bao MDLSu HLuo S,et al. Safety and feasibility of overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis technique for digestive tract reconstruction during complete laparoscopic right hemicolectomy[J]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi2022,44(5):436-441.
[5]
Xia TPan ZZhang J,et al. Comparison of postoperative recovery of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer with modified triangular anastomosis or tubular anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Surg2021,21(1):77.
[6]
晁祥嵩,王强,陈秉魁. 重叠式三角吻合技术在单孔腹腔镜直肠前切除术治疗直肠癌的应用价值[J]. 吉林医学2022,43(09):2346-2349.
[7]
王凌风,林圣涛,杨常顺,等. 右半结肠D3淋巴结清扫术对腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术患者疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022,16(05):499-501.
[8]
Milone MDesiderio AVelotti N,et al. Surgical stress and metabolic response after totally laparoscopic right colectomy. Sci Rep[J]. Sci Rep2021,11(1):9652.
[9]
Cianci PGattulli DMinafra M,et al. Totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with up-down approach. A single institution experience[J]. Ann Ital Chir2021,92:365-371.
[10]
胡剑平,王振乾,张龙,等. 尾侧中间联合入路与尾侧入路在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用对比[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2024,18(02):196-199.
[11]
王少杰,黄平. 完全腹腔镜下右半结肠癌切除术后回结肠吻合的研究现状与相关争议[J].结直肠肛门外科2022,28(01):93-96.
[12]
林国乐,李干斌. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术腔内吻合操作要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2023,43(10):1136-1139.
[13]
Lv JChen HGuan X,et al. Laparoscopic radical transverse colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction: A novel natural orifice specimen extraction procedure: A case report[J]. J Minim Access Surg2023,19(3):440-442.
[14]
Zhang MLu ZZheng Z,et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between totally laparoscopic right colectomy and laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy: a retrospective study in a single institution on 300 consecutive patients[J]. Surg Endosc2022,36(1):176-184.
[15]
Hamamoto HSuzuki YTakano Y,et al. Medium-term oncological outcomes of totally laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for right-sided and left-sided colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis[J]. BMC Surg2022,22(1):345.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[11] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[12] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要