切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 570 -573. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.027

论著

血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值
丁志翔1,(), 于鹏1, 段绍斌1   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学附属中医院普外一科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-28 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 丁志翔

The value of plasma BRAF gene detection for pyloric lymph node dissection during laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer

Zhixiang Ding1,(), Peng Yu1, Shaobin Duan1   

  1. 1. Departments of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830000, China
  • Received:2023-08-28 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhixiang Ding
  • Supported by:
    Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation Project(2018D01C283)
引用本文:

丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.

Zhixiang Ding, Peng Yu, Shaobin Duan. The value of plasma BRAF gene detection for pyloric lymph node dissection during laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.

目的

评估血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值。

方法

前瞻性选取2019年3月至2021年2月行腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的98例患者为研究对象。数据使用SPSS 25.0软件处理,计数资料以[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验;正态数据使用()表示,行独立样本t检验;一致性使用Kappa系数检验;绘制ROC曲线,检验BRAD基因突变对右半结肠癌幽门下淋巴结转移以及复发的评估效能。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

98例右半结肠癌患者均顺利完成腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术,45例血浆BRAF基因阳性患者行幽门下淋巴结清扫,53例血浆BRAF基因隐形患者未行幽门下淋巴结清扫。行幽门下淋巴结清扫的患者TNM Ⅲ期、结肠肝曲癌、近端横结肠癌以及BRAF基因突变比例高于未清扫的患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);BRAF基因突变评估右半结肠癌幽门下淋巴结转移与病理诊断结果的具有较强一致性(Kappa=0.604)。ROC数据显示,BRAF基因突变评估右半结肠癌幽门下淋巴结转移的AUC为0.788。BRAF基因突变评估右半结肠癌术后复发与随访结果符合率为90.0%。ROC数据显示,BRAF基因突变评估右半结肠癌术后复发转移的AUC为0.622。

结论

右半结肠癌患者BRAF基因突变通过增加幽门下淋巴结转移风险,导致术后复发转移风险增加,对于血浆BRAF基因突变的患者应考虑行幽门下淋巴结清扫。

Objective

To evaluate the value of plasma BRAF gene detection for pyloric lymph node dissection during laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer.

Methods

A total of 98 patients undergoing laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer from March 2019 to February 2021 were prospectively selected as the study subjects. SPSS 25.0 software was used to process the data. Statistical data were presented as [cases (%)] and χ2 test was used. The normal data were represented by (), and the inter-group comparison line independent sample t test; Consistency was tested by Kappa coefficient. ROC curve was drawn to test the efficacy of BRAD gene mutation in evaluating the metastasis and recurrence of right subpyloric lymph node of colon cancer. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

All 98 patients with right hemicolonic carcinoma successfully completed laparoscopic D3 radical resection. 45 patients with positive plasma BRAF gene received subpyloric lymph node dissection, while 53 patients with invisible plasma BRAF gene did not receive subpyloric lymph node dissection. The proportion of TNM stage Ⅲ, hepatocellular carcinoma, proximal transverse colon cancer and BRAF gene mutation in patients with subpyloric lymph node dissection was higher than that of patients without dissection, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). BRAF gene mutation in the evaluation of right hemicolonic carcinoma subpyloric lymph node metastasis and pathological diagnosis showed a strong consistency (Kappa=0.604). ROC data showed an AUC of 0.788 for BRAF mutations evaluating subpyloric lymph node metastasis in right colon cancer. The coincidence rate between postoperative recurrence of right colon cancer assessed by BRAF mutation and follow-up was 90.0%. ROC data showed that the AUC of BRAF gene mutations evaluating postoperative recurrence and metastasis of right colon cancer was 0.628.

Conclusion

BRAF gene mutation in patients with right hemicolonic carcinoma increases the risk of postoperative recurrence and metastasis by increasing the risk of subpyloric lymph node metastasis. Subpyloric lymph node dissection should be considered in patients with plasma BRAF gene mutation.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
图1 BRAF基因评估右半结肠癌幽门下淋巴结转移的ROC曲线 图2 BRAF基因评估右半结肠癌术后复发的ROC曲线
[1]
陈垚,蔡丙华,朱建伟,等. 右半结肠癌根治术中全结肠系膜切除的内侧界限选择[J]. 实用临床医药杂志2021,25(02):84-86.
[2]
卢晓云,王继伟,谢铭. 中国腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治淋巴结清扫范围的争议与思考[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022,16(05):487-491.
[3]
张迎峰,蒋恒,方征,等. 幽门下淋巴结清扫在右半结肠癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 重庆医学2022,51(24):4155-4159.
[4]
冯波,周乐其. 右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫范围及入路选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2020,40(03):274-278.
[5]
Iino IKikuchi HSuzuki T,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of three-dimensional anatomy of perigastric vessels using enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography[J]. BMC Surg2022,22(1):403.
[6]
Grothey AFakih MTabernero J. Management of BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer:a review of treatment options and evidence-based guidelines[J]. Ann Oncol2021,32(8):959-967.
[7]
González-Colunga KJLino-Silva LSSalcedo-Hernández RA,et al. BRAF V600E Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Colon Cancer and Clinico-pathologic Features Associated with BRAF-Mutated Colonic Cancers in Mexican Patients[J]. J Gastrointest Cancer2020,51(1):35-40.
[8]
中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局,中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志2018,56(04):241-258.
[9]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科医师委员会,等. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术操作指南(2018版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2018,17(09):877-885.
[10]
牟东成,杨国山,朱建平,等. 腹腔镜扩大右半结肠癌根治术手术体会[J]. 中国临床医生杂志2018,46(01):57-59.
[11]
Watanabe TMuro KAjioka Y,et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum(JSCCR)guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol2018,23(1):1-34.
[12]
易小江,冯晓创,李洪明,等. 结肠肝曲癌腹腔镜扩大右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门下组淋巴结清扫的临床资料分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科2022,28(03):280-284.
[13]
张冬生,封益飞,王勇,等. 右半结肠癌No.206组淋巴结转移的观察研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志2021,26(03):214-217.
[14]
李明,杨庆强. 结肠肝曲癌淋巴结转移规律及影响因素的前瞻性临床分析[J]. 医学研究杂志2022,51(10):147-150,142.
[15]
Ciombor KKStrickler JHBekaii-Saab TS,et al. BRAF-Mutated Advanced Colorectal Cancer:A Rapidly Changing Therapeutic Landscape[J]. J Clin Oncol2022,40(24):2706-2715.
[16]
Sun CEspaña SBuges C,et al. Treatment of Advanced BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer:Where We Are and Where We Are Going[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer2022,21(2):71-79.
[17]
宋创业,严丽,孟艳林,等. BRAFV600E突变在cN0期PTMC颈中央区淋巴结转移中的预测价值[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2020,14(06):631-634.
[18]
Uhlitz FBischoff PPeidli S,et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase activity drives cell trajectories in colorectal cancer[J]. EMBO Mol Med2021,13(10):e14123.
[19]
哈力木拉提·吾布力卡斯木,廖瑛琦. 核磁共振T2WI联合弥散加权成像对结肠癌术前淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 新疆医科大学学报2021,44(11):1241-1244.
[20]
何海月,宋丽萍. PET/CT预测结直肠癌区域淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志2021,40(11):2158-2162.
[21]
郭振江,王宁,刘防震. 左右半结肠癌根治性切除术患者的临床病理特征及预后对比[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2020,30(21):67-73.
[1] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[2] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[3] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[4] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[5] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[6] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[7] 姜宁宁, 蔺艳丽, 陈惠明. 胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.
[8] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[9] 高建新, 王啸飞, 于淼, 路夷平. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后行ISR术远切缘距离的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 539-543.
[10] 周丽, 林巧. 腹腔镜TME与开腹手术治疗原发性直肠癌对患者近远期疗效及生存率的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 544-546.
[11] 李阳, 董峰, 曾立鹏. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后腹腔镜TaTME与TME中的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 547-550.
[12] 兰运升, 赵梓竣. 腹腔镜下高位与低位结扎肠系膜下动脉对低位直肠癌患者的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 551-553.
[13] 李猛, 姜腊, 董磊, 吴情, 贾犇黎. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病及脂肪胰的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 554-557.
[14] 蔡永芹, 王君菊, 张敬敬. 不同下纵隔淋巴结清扫顺序在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[15] 崔宏帅, 冯丽明, 东维玲, 韩博. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术+IGLN清扫术治疗局部进展期结肠肝曲癌的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
阅读次数
全文


摘要