切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 562 -565. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.025

论著

不同下纵隔淋巴结清扫顺序在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中应用效果研究
蔡永芹1,(), 王君菊2, 张敬敬3   
  1. 1. 250021 济南,山东第一医科大学附属省立医院
    2. 250021 济南,山东省立第三医院康复科
    3. 250021 济南,山东第一医科大学附属省立医院保健心血管科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-07 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 蔡永芹

Application of different sequences of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection in Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

Yongqin Cai1,(), Junju Wang2, Jingjing Zhang3   

  1. 1. Blindness Prevention Office of Shandong First Medical University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Jinan Shandong Province 250021, China
    2. Department of Rehabilitation, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan Shandong Province 250031, China
    3. Department of Health and Cardiovascular, Shandong First Medical University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Jinan Shandong Province 250021, China
  • Received:2024-03-07 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Yongqin Cai
引用本文:

蔡永芹, 王君菊, 张敬敬. 不同下纵隔淋巴结清扫顺序在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.

Yongqin Cai, Junju Wang, Jingjing Zhang. Application of different sequences of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection in Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.

目的

对比研究不同下纵隔淋巴结清扫顺序在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)手术中的应用效果及安全性。

方法

选取2021年1月至2022年12月期间手术治疗的SiewertⅡ型AEG患者80例,采用随机数字表法均分为两组,每组患者各40例。两组患者均行腹腔镜下经腹食管裂孔(TH)入路下纵隔淋巴结清扫术。A组患者采用食管为中心按“腹侧→背侧→两侧”顺序进行清扫,B组采用“右侧→背侧→腹侧→左侧”顺序进行清扫。采用SPSS 20.0软件分析数据,围手术期指标、淋巴结清扫等采用()表示,行独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,行χ2Fisher或秩和检验;Kaplan-Meier法行术后生存分析,采用Log-Rank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术,食管切缘均为阴性;B组患者下纵隔淋巴结清扫时间及清扫时出血优于A组(P<0.05);两组患者淋巴结清扫数目、术后恢复指标、并发症发生率及预后生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经腹TH入路两种下纵隔淋巴结清扫顺序均是安全可行的,具有近似的清扫效果及预后。以心下囊作为解剖标识,按“右侧→背侧→腹侧→左侧”顺序进行下纵隔淋巴结清扫利于提高手术安全可操作性,缩短下纵隔淋巴清扫时间,降低出血。

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of different sequences of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection in Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG).

Methods

A total of 80 Siewert type II AEG patients undergoing surgical treatment from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and divided into two groups using random number table method, with 40 patients in each group. Both groups underwent laparoscopic transesophageal hiatus (TH) approach to lower mediastinal lymph node dissection. Patients in group A were cleaned in the order of "ventral → dorsal → bilateral" with the esophagus as the center, and group B was cleaned in the order of "right → dorsal → ventral → left". SPSS 20.0 software was used to analyze the data. Perioperative indicators and lymph node dissection were represented by independent sample t test. Complications and other statistical data were represented by [cases (%)], χ2 or Fisher or Rank Sum test; Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test was used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

All patients successfully completed the operation, esophagotomy margin was negative. The time and bleeding of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection in group B were better than those in group A (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery index, incidence of complications and prognosis survival between 2 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The two sequences of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection by transabdominal TH approach are safe and feasible, and have similar sweeping effect and prognosis. Using the subcardiac sac as the anatomic marker, lower mediastinal lymph node dissection in the sequence of "right → dorsal → ventral → left" was beneficial to improve surgical safety and maneuverability, shorten the time of lower mediastinal lymph dissection and reduce bleeding.

表1 两组患者基线资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术相关指标比较
表3 两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
图1 两组患者累积生存曲线
[1]
Manabe NMatsueda KHaruma K. Epidemiological Review of Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in Asian Countries[J]. Digestion2022,103(1):29-36.
[2]
胡建昆,陈小龙. 食管胃结合部腺癌外科治疗争议、共识及进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志2023,30(10):1153-1158.
[3]
郑民华,臧潞,马君俊,等. SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌腔镜手术治疗中国专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2019,39(11):1129-1135.
[4]
Kurokawa YTakeuchi HDoki Y,et al. Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Esophagogastric Junction Tumors: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study[J]. Ann Surg2021,274(1):120-127.
[5]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatmentguidelines2018(5thedition)[J]. GastricCancer2021,24(1):1-21.
[6]
国际食管疾病学会中国分会(CSDE)食管胃结合部疾病跨界联盟,中国医师协会内镜医师分会腹腔镜外科专业委员会,中国医师协会外科医师分会上消化道外科医师专业委员会,等.食管胃结合部腺癌外科治疗中国专家共识(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2018,21(09):961-975.
[7]
王大广,李伟张洋,等. 经食管裂孔下纵隔淋巴结清扫在SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌根治术中应用价值研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2022,42(02):187-192.
[8]
李勇,郑佳彬,赖宏坤. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌手术下纵隔淋巴结清扫范围与技巧[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2023,43(09):1008-1012.
[9]
王嘉玮,游庆军,李晓林,等. 基于CT三层四分法的经腹入路腹腔镜手术治疗胃食管交界肿瘤的临床价值[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2021,15(04):400-403.
[10]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021(6th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer2023,26(1):1-25.
[11]
张建锋,田洋,徐延昭,等. 不同手术径路在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌根治术中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2021,20(06):675-682.
[12]
赵骏杰,刘凤林. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜近端胃切除术及淋巴结清扫[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2022,25(02):114-119.
[13]
郝阳,吴刚孙培春. 3D腹腔镜治疗食管胃结合部SiewertⅡ型腺癌103例临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2018,12(03):231-233.
[14]
胡文庆,崔鹏,张晋杰,等. 对食管胃结合部腺癌经腹食管裂孔入路进行下纵隔淋巴结清扫的认识[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2019,22(10):932-936.
[15]
Nishiwaki NNoma KMatsuda T,et al. Risk factor of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of Siewert type I and II esophagogastric junction carcinomas[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg2020,405(8):1101-1109.
[1] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[2] 史成宇, 季晓琳, 田莉莹, 张来香. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中第14c/d组淋巴结清扫在胰头癌中的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 430-433.
[3] 郭倩, 张晓峰, 张鹏, 苏文博. “四步法”清扫No.253淋巴结在保留LCA的直肠癌根治术中的研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[4] 达热拜·热达提, 刘林, 赵为民, 孟涛, 雷程, 金博, 毕建军, 李新宇, 王海江. 中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后侧方淋巴结清扫术的临床观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-418.
[5] 康乐平, 张琳, 万舟, 苟勇. 腔镜皮下腺体切除及腋窝淋巴结清扫加假体植入术治疗乳腺癌疗效及并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 427-429.
[6] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[7] 张彬, 贾贵清, 吴东松, 曹绿洲, 张焰凌, 黄灏, 赵高平. 早期胃癌保功能手术治疗13例病例分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 575-579.
[8] 黄小龙, 林师佈, 韩霖, 陈有科, 杨彦. 不同淋巴结清扫范围的肝内胆管细胞癌根治性切除术的预后研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 401-404.
[9] 韩超, 解曙哲, 赵强, 宋应明, 连长红. 腹腔镜辅助近端胃切除双通道吻合技术治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌的近期疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 296-299.
[10] 吴昊, 段海明, 高坤鹏, 雷小妮. 两种乳腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗乳腺癌的临床观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 280-283.
[11] 邹庆涛, 张洪贞, 尹作文, 喻军, 张鹏. 食管胃结合部腺癌根治术三种消化道重建方式的临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 545-548.
[12] 王龙龙, 王灼印, 李瑞欣, 王敬涛, 张云飞, 汲翔, 孙于翔, 王国俊. 俯卧位胸内手工吻合在食管受累≥4 cm的食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 331-335.
[13] 周灿坤, 李庆东, 江卓飞, 肇丽杰, 郑玉华, 柳晓春, 谢庆煌, 黄晓斌. 阴式广泛联合经阴道内镜腹膜外淋巴结切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 368-371.
[14] 黄文鹏, 李莉明, 高剑波. 食管胃结合部腺癌的研究现状[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 160-166.
[15] 贾卓奇, 李硕, 陈健, 张广健, 付军科. 新辅助治疗后胸腹腔镜下Ivor-Lewis食管胃结合部腺癌根治术1例并文献复习[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 111-116.
阅读次数
全文


摘要