切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 494 -497. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.007

论著

不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较
张钊1, 骆成玉1, 张树琦1, 何平1, 李旭斌2,()   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院普外科
    2. 100144 北京,首都医科大学附属北京康复医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-01 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 李旭斌

Comparison of the effect, complication rate and recurrence rate of different operation methods in treating early breast cancer

Zhao Zhang1, Chengyu Luo1, Shuqi Zhang1, Ping He1, Xubin Li2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medicine University, Beijing 100020, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
  • Received:2024-04-01 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Xubin Li
  • Supported by:
    National Key Project of the 14th Five-Year Plan of National Health Commission(YYWS5622)
引用本文:

张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.

Zhao Zhang, Chengyu Luo, Shuqi Zhang, Ping He, Xubin Li. Comparison of the effect, complication rate and recurrence rate of different operation methods in treating early breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.

目的

比较经腋窝单孔充气法乳腺腔镜手术与经乳晕切口手术治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率。

方法

回顾性分析2021年2月至2023年10月126例早期乳腺癌患者的临床资料,根据术式不同分为A组(行经腋窝单孔充气法乳腺腔镜手术,n=65例)和B组(行经乳晕切口手术,n=61例)。采用SPSS 24.0分析数据。围手术期指标、乳腺癌治疗的美学及局部效果标准化结局指标(SOMA-LNET)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)等计量资料用()表示,行独立样本t检验;并发症和复发率等计数资料行χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

A组患者手术时间长于B组(P<0.05),而术中出血量、切口长度、住院天数均少于B组(P<0.05);A组患者术后SOMA-LNET各项评分均高于B组(P<0.05);术后1d、1周,两组患者VAS评分均较术前降低,且A组均低于B组(P<0.05);术后1个月、6个月,两组患者GQOLI-74各项评分均较术前升高,且A组高于B组(P<0.05);术后随访6个月,A组复发率4.6%,B组复发率9.8%,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组患者并发症总发生率为4.6%,低于B组的18.0%(P<0.05)。

结论

相较于经乳晕切口手术,经腋窝单孔充气法乳腺腔镜手术治疗早期乳腺癌,疗效显著,术后乳房美观度更好,安全性高。

Objective

To compare the effect, complication rate and recurrence rate of breast cancer treated by axillary single hole aeration endoscopic surgery and areola incision surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of 126 patients with early breast cancer from February 2021 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into group A (transaxillary single hole aeration breast endoscopic surgery, n=65 cases) and group B (transareolar incision surgery, n=61 cases) according to different operation methods. SPSS 24.0 was used to analyze the data. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators, standardized outcome indicators of aesthetic and local effects of breast cancer treatment (SOMA-LNET), visual analogue scale (VAS) and comprehensive quality of life Assessment Questionnaire (GQOLI-74) were represented by The clinical data of 126 patients with early breast cancer from February 2021 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into group A (transaxillary single hole aeration breast endoscopic surgery, n=65 cases) and group B (transareolar incision surgery, n=61 cases) according to different operation methods. SPSS 24.0 was used to analyze the data. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators, standardized outcome indicators of aesthetic and local effects of breast cancer treatment (SOMA-LNET), visual analogue scale (VAS) and comprehensive quality of life Assessment Questionnaire (GQOLI-74) were represented by (), and independent sample t test was performed. The statistical data of complications and recurrence rate were chi-square test. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The operative time of group A was longer than that of group B (P<0.05), while the amount of blood loss, incision length and hospitalization days of group A were lower than those of group A (P<0.05). The SOMA-LNET scores in group A were higher than those in group B (P<0.05). One day and one week after surgery, VAS scores in both groups were lower than before surgery, and group A was lower than group B (P<0.05). The scores of GQOLI-74 in both groups were higher than those before surgery 1 month and 6 months after surgery, and group A was higher than group B (P<0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate was 4.6% in group A and 9.8% in group B, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). The total complication rate of group A was 4.6%, which was lower than that of group B (18.0%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with transareolar incision, transaxillary single hole aeration breast endoscopic surgery is effective in the treatment of early breast cancer, with better postoperative breast beauty and high safety.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者手术指征比较(
表3 两组患者SOMA-LNET评分比较(
表4 两组患者VAS评分比较(分,
表5 两组患者GQOLI-74评分比较(分,
表6 两组患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
周千贺,尚岳峰,刘通,等. 纯单孔腔镜非溶脂保乳手术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的临床应用[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志,2023,17(02):143-149.
[2]
王子函,谢芳,闫笑生,等. 充气法单孔腔镜保留乳房手术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2020,14(04):228-233.
[3]
海琳悦,王雪菲,刘博文,等. 经腋窝单孔充气法乳腺腔镜手术治疗乳腺疾病的临床应用分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2023,50(05):255-259.
[4]
程文,曾安贵,李攀,等. 保留ATN、ICBN手术治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌的可行性及安全性分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(03):310-313.
[5]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会,中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组,邵志敏. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2024年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2023,33(12):1092-1186.
[6]
丁卯,向泓雨,辛灵,等. 中国腔镜乳腺癌手术20年回顾与展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2023,43(02):155-158.
[7]
陈峙霖,李京泰,陈国平,等. 保留乳头乳晕的乳腺切除术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床与美学效果观察[J]. 中国美容医学,2023,32(06):27-30.
[8]
Qu YHan YWang W,et al. Clinical analysis of total endoscopic thyroidectomy via breast areola approach in early differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. J BUON2021,26(3):1022-1027.
[9]
韩拓,张伟,陈亮,等. 三种手术方式治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期乳腺癌的疗效及预后比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(02):150-153.
[10]
徐新伟,杜秀銮,黄炎,等. 年轻乳腺癌患者(<35岁)的临床病理特征及生存预后分析[J]. 现代实用医学,2020,32(03):327-329.
[11]
马云飞,刘尧邦,李宏,等. 经乳晕、腋皱襞切口乳腺癌术后自体背阔肌皮瓣乳房重建[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报,2020,42(06):610-614.
[12]
胥金安,赵英竹,李黎荟,等. 单孔腔镜保留乳头乳晕全乳切除术在早期乳腺癌中的应用效果探讨[J]. 中国临床新医学,2023,16(09):896-900.
[13]
Wang ZHGang TRWu SS,et al. Single-port endoscopic-sentinel lymph node biopsy combined with indocyanine green and carbon nanoparticles in breast cancer[J]. Surg Endosc2023,37(10):7591-7599.
[14]
孙丽,岂怀华,王晶,等. 乳腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术对早期乳腺癌患者的治疗效果[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志,2023,15(09):1547-1551.
[15]
刘卫华,王子函,田一鸣,等. 单孔充气法腔镜乳房皮下腺体切除术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床疗效[J]. 国际外科学杂志,2021,48(03):149-154,F3.
[16]
Yang HLiang FXie Y,et al. Single axillary incision reverse-order endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy followed by subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Technique,clinical outcomes,and aesthetic results from 88 preliminary procedures[J]. Surgery2023,174(3):464-472.
[1] 翟刚, 邓修民, 岑川, 黄锋, 黄显壮, 王运成. 改良双通道吻合法在完全腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 397-400.
[2] 郭倩, 张晓峰, 张鹏, 苏文博. “四步法”清扫No.253淋巴结在保留LCA的直肠癌根治术中的研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[3] 丁关棣, 黄云, 曹震, 刘刚. 胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测:基于真实世界数据的Nomogram模型开发与验证[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.
[4] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[5] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[6] 张阳, 纽燕娜, 常丽蓉, 唐国华, 赵萍. ERAS理念下肝棘球蚴病术后并发症风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 287-290.
[7] 张立一, 徐春晓, 单玉玺. sEST联合不同扩张时间EPBD治疗胆总管结石的随机临床试验[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 295-298.
[8] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. “RLN三角”在经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 307-310.
[9] 王东阳, 林琳, 娄熙彬. SII对局部进展期胃癌nCRT+腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-318.
[10] 吴鹏, 许维, 王壮, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 隧道法行腹腔镜下脾切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 319-322.
[11] 郑伟军, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 先天性肠旋转不良诊治分析:单中心10年经验总结[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 338-341.
[12] 许桂祥, 吴海华, 赵鸿志, 徐丽, 胡晓萍, 周世龙, 武永明, 彭新刚. 后鞘前入路腹腔镜视野下腹股沟区脂肪归属的解剖要点及临床意义[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 277-281.
[13] 于泽, 隋宇航, 孙备. 坏死性胰腺炎相关并发症外科干预策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 450-455.
[14] 冀旭, 朱峰, 冯业晨. 保留器官功能的胰腺切除术后胆道并发症发生危险因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 509-514.
[15] 陈先志, 许磊, 冯其柱, 王琦. 布地奈德联合复方异丙托溴铵雾化吸入在老年患者腹腔镜围手术期中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 531-536.
阅读次数
全文


摘要