切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 80 -83. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.01.022.

论著

超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响
谢田伟1,(), 庞于樊1, 吴丽2   
  1. 1.621000 四川绵阳,四川绵阳四〇四医院甲状腺外科
    2.621000 四川绵阳,四川绵阳四〇四医院门诊部
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-05 出版日期:2025-02-26
  • 通信作者: 谢田伟
  • 基金资助:
    四川省抗癌协会2022年(齐鲁)科研资金专项科研课题(XH2022-112)

Effect of different ultrasound-guided ablation on the volume reduction rate and recurrence rate of benign thyroid nodules

Tianwei Xie1,(), Yufan Pang1, Li Wu1   

  1. 1.Department of Thyroid Surgery,Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital, Mianyang Sichuan Province 621000,China
  • Received:2024-06-05 Published:2025-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Tianwei Xie
引用本文:

谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.

Tianwei Xie, Yufan Pang, Li Wu. Effect of different ultrasound-guided ablation on the volume reduction rate and recurrence rate of benign thyroid nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.

目的

探究超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节(BTN)体积缩减率、复发率的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2019 年1 月至2023 年1 月227 例患者280 枚BTN临床资料,将2019 年1 月至2021年1月入院接受射频消融术(RFA)治疗的115例患者136枚BTN纳入射频组,将2021年2月至2023年1月入院接受微波消融术(MWA)治疗的112例患者144枚BTN纳入微波组,采用SPSS 22.0统计学软件分析。两组患者结节体积及缩减率等计量资料用(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;即刻消融结节情况、随访1年后结节复发率、并发症发生情况等计数资料采用χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

微波组1~2cm和3~5cm BTN即刻消融结节率为96.2%和67.9%,显著高于射频组79.7%和41.8%(P<0.05);术后各时间点,两组患者结节体积均较术前显著减小,且微波组显著小于射频组(P<0.05);两组患者结节缩减率均较术前显著升高,且微波组显著高于射频组(P<0.05);随访1年后,微波组患者结节复发率显著低于射频组(P<0.05);治疗随访期间及术后12个月,结节直径<1cm的即刻消融结节率、并发症发生率和两组美容评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

超声引导下MWA对BTN即刻消融情况良好,能缩小其体积并使缩减率显著增加,能有效降低复发率。

Objective

To investigate the effects of different ultrasound-guided ablation on the volume reduction rate and recurrence rate of benign thyroid nodules (BTN).

Methods

The clinical data of 280 BTN from 227 patients from January 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.136 BTN from 115 patients admitted for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment from January 2019 to January 2021 were included in the radiofrequency group.144 BTN from 112 patients admitted to hospital for microwave ablation(MWA) from February 2021 to January 2023 were included in the microwave group and analyzed by SPSS 22.0 statistical software.Measurement data such as nodule volume and reduction rate of patients in the two groups were expressed with(x ± s), and independent sample t test was used.The data of immediate ablation, recurrence rate and complications after 1 year of follow-up were analyzed by χ2 test.P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The immediate ablation rates of 1 to 2cm and 3 to 5cm BTN in microwave group were 96.2% and 67.9%, significantly higher than those in radiofrequency group (79.7% and 41.8%,P<0.05).At each time point after operation, the nodule volume in both groups was significantly decreased,and the microwave group was significantly smaller than the radiofrequency group (P<0.05).The reduction rate of nodules in both groups was significantly higher than that before surgery, and the microwave group was significantly higher than the radiofrequency group (P<0.05).After 1 year follow-up, the recurrence rate of nodules in microwave group was significantly lower than that in radiofrequency group (P<0.05).During the follow-up period and 12 months after treatment, there were no significant differences in the rate of immediate ablation of nodules <1cm in diameter, the incidence of complications and aesthetic scores between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided MWA ablation of BTN can reduce its volume and increase the reduction rate significantly, which can effectively reduce the recurrence rate.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者即刻消融结节率比较
表3 两组患者结节体积、缩减率及随访1年后结节复发率比较
表4 两组患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
倪怀亮,韩冬,赵志浩.两种手术方式在甲状腺良性结节治疗中对临床主要指标的影响[J].贵州医药, 2023, 47(07): 1095-1096.
[2]
颜璟,吴艳军,杨映弘,等.微波消融与开放手术治疗甲状腺良性结节的比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017, 11(06): 525-527.
[3]
彭卫,段波峰,张明帅,等.微波消融和射频消融治疗甲状腺良性结节的疗效和安全性比较[J].中国医师杂志,2022, 24(11):1670-1673.
[4]
中华医学会内分泌学会《中国甲状腺疾病诊治指南》编写组.中国甲状腺疾病诊治指南——甲状腺结节[J].中华内科杂志, 2008, 47(10): 867-868.
[5]
彭晓琳.超声引导下热消融治疗甲状腺疾病的研究进展[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2022, 28(02): 170-174.
[6]
侯文颖,杨敬春,常莹,等.甲状腺良性结节射频消融短期疗效及相关影响因素分析[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(06):622-625.
[7]
张明,康飞,汪静,等.微波消融治疗甲状腺良性结节的临床效果观察及影响因素分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床, 2022,29(11): 1881-1885.
[8]
夏林玉,胡清林.微波消融术治疗甲状腺良性结节的疗效及影响因素分析[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2022, 32(09): 73-77.
[9]
Paparodis RD, Karvounis E, Bantouna D, et al.Large, Slowly Growing, Benign Thyroid Nodules Frequently Coexist With Synchronous Thyroid Cancers[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022,107(8): e3474-e3478.
[10]
Kassi GN, Evangelopoulou CC, Papapostolou KD, et al.Benign and malignant thyroid nodules with autoimmune thyroiditis[J].Arch Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 66(4): 446-451.
[11]
梁龙,苏民富,李嘉根.甲状腺腺叶切除术两种显露喉返神经方法的临床疗效[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021, 15(06): 680-682.
[12]
Grünwald F, Baumgarten J, Happel C, et al.Radiofrequenzablation benigner Schilddrüsenknoten [Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules] [J].Laryngorhinootologie, 2022, 101(7): 569-573.
[13]
陈智全,刘学军,木努热丁·艾则孜,等.射频消融术和腹腔镜手术治疗原发性小肝癌的前瞻性对照研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 205-207.
[14]
Erturk MS, Cekic B, Celik M.Microwave Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Effects on Systemic Inflammatory Response[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2020, 30(7): 694-700.
[15]
吴军,解翔,姜凡,等.喉部超声评估甲状腺结节热消融术中声带功能的应用[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(10): 1088-1091.
[16]
伍宏兵,李保启, 周维风,等.超声引导下微波消融甲状腺良性结节的疗效及影响因素[J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2023,34(04): 238-241.
[17]
李晓涛.射频消融术治疗早期原发性肝癌的近远期疗效及血清miR-202水平相关分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 250-252.
[1] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[2] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[3] 吴文娟, 王小莉, 刘娟. 乳腺结节微创手术治疗进展研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 229-232.
[4] 宋铭杰, 韩青雷, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 内镜下晚期肝外胆管恶性肿瘤消融治疗研究现况[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 340-342.
[5] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[6] 孙中伟, 郭宏坤, 薛意恒, 孟岩. 脱细胞基质补片和聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后复发的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 419-422.
[7] 杨涛, 吕学祥, 李念, 王燕红, 余梦琳, Menglin Yu. 阵发性房颤射频消融术后肺静脉狭窄的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 814-817.
[8] 莫鹏, 郭杏春, 梁秀娟, 王耀明. 超声引导与CT引导射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者疗效及预后比较[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 151-154.
[9] 张朋伟, 杨朝凤, 李杨. 结直肠癌肝转移介入治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 177-182.
[10] 蒲丹, 龙煊, 周玉龙, 李甘霖. 血清外泌体miR-224对结直肠癌肝转移患者射频消融治疗后复发的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 45-52.
[11] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[12] 萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
[13] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
[14] 张靖, 柏君, 陈玉盟, 张鹏, 侯芳芳, 王军芳, 孙静, 赵士博, 杨喆, 张玥, 张瑞芳, 朱宏斌. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病患者的临床疗效[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 121-125.
[15] 王艳, 吕美慧, 王美峰, 林琳, 张国新, 姜柳琴. 内镜下抗反流黏膜切除术与热能射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病的临床疗效对比:一项单中心随机试验[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 130-134.
阅读次数
全文


摘要