切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 323 -326. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.03.024

论著

三种肝血流阻断技术在腹腔镜下肝切除术中的对比研究
张安清1,(), 东爱华1, 李红霞1, 李爱华1   
  1. 1. 610000 成都,成都上锦南府医院/四川大学华西医院上锦医院普外三科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-07 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 张安清

Comparative study of three hepatic blood flow blocking techniques in laparoscopic hepatectomy

Anqing Zhang1,(), Aihua Dong1, Hongxia Li1, Aihua Li1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery III,Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Sichuan University West China Hospital Shangjin Hospital,Chengdu Sichuan Province 610000,China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Anqing Zhang
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Provincial Medical Research Project Project(S19019); 2020 Sichuan Youth Innovation and Scientific Research Project(Q20060)
引用本文:

张安清, 东爱华, 李红霞, 李爱华. 三种肝血流阻断技术在腹腔镜下肝切除术中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 323-326.

Anqing Zhang, Aihua Dong, Hongxia Li, Aihua Li. Comparative study of three hepatic blood flow blocking techniques in laparoscopic hepatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 323-326.

目的

对比研究三种肝血流阻断技术在腹腔镜下肝切除术中的临床效果,分析三种技术对肝癌患者机体氧化应激损伤及肝肾功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年1月143例肝癌行腹腔镜下肝切除术患者的临床资料,根据不同血流阻断方法将患者分为A组(Pringle法阻断入肝血流,n=59例)、B组(改良Pringle法阻断入肝血流,n=33例)和C组(改良Pringle法阻断入肝血流+下腔静脉阻断法,n=51例)。采用SPSS 22.0统计学软件进行数据分析,围手术期各项指标、氧化应激指标、肝肾功能指标以(

xˉ
±s)表示,多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,两组间比较采用t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2Fisher精确检验。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

C组患者术中出血量及输血量均明显少于A、B组(P<0.05)。三组患者术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3 d、7 d患者的超氧化物歧化酶水平C组高于A、B组(P<0.05);术后1 d、3 d患者的丙二醛水平C组明显低于A、B组(P<0.05);术后1 d、3 d患者的谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶水平C组高于A、B组(P<0.05)。术后1 d、3 d、7 d C组患者的谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶、总胆红素水平均明显低于A组(P<0.05);三组患者术后肌酐及尿素氮水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

改良Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法可减少肝癌患者术中出血量,且对患者机体氧化应激损伤及肝功能损伤较小。

Objective

The clinical effects of three hepatic blood flow occlusion techniques in laparoscopic hepatectomy were compared to analyze the effects of the three techniques on oxidative stress injury and liver and kidney function in patients with liver cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 143 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy from January 2017 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different blood occlusion methods,the patients were divided into group A(hepatic blood flow occlusion by Pringle method,n=59 cases)and group B(hepatic blood flow occlusion by modified Pringle method,n=33 cases)and C group(improved Pringle method + inferior vena cava method,n=51 cases). SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Perioperative indicators,oxidative stress indicators and liver and kidney function indicators were expressed as(

xˉ
±s). One-way ANOVA was used for multi-group comparison and t test was used for comparison between two groups. Postoperative complications were measured by χ2 or Fisher's exact test. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The amount of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion in group C were significantly less than those in groups A and B(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups(P>0.05). The level of superoxide dismutase in group C was higher than that in groups A and B at 3 and 7 days after operation(P<0.05). The level of malondialdehyde in group C was significantly lower than that in group A and B at 1 and 3 days after operation(P<0.05). The level of glutathione peroxidase in group C was higher than that in groups A and B at 1 and 3 days after operation(P<0.05). The levels of alanine aminotransferase,aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin in group C were significantly lower than those in group A at 1,3 and 7 days after operation(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative creatinine and urea nitrogen levels among the three groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

Modified pringle method combined with inferior vena cava blocking method can reduce intraoperative blood loss in patients with liver cancer,and has less damage to oxidative stress and liver function.

表1 143例肝癌切除术中不同血流阻断方法三组患者一般资料比较[(
x
±s),例]
表2 143例肝癌切除术中不同血流阻断方法三组患者术中指标比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表3 143例肝癌切除术中不同血流阻断方法三组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 143例肝癌切除术中不同血流阻断方法三组患者氧化应激水平比较(
x
±s
表5 143例肝癌切除术中不同血流阻断方法三组患者肝肾功能指标比较(
x
±s
[1]
Siegel RLMiller KDJemal A. Cancer statistics,2020[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202070(1):7-30.
[2]
王亚运,胡欢,王世垚,等. 肝血流阻断技术在肝切除术中的应用[J]. 西北国防医学杂志202041(1):58-63.
[3]
姚磊,王志明,欧阳锡武,等. 不同入肝血流阻断技术在原发性肝细胞癌肝切除术中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志201928(7):815-824.
[4]
徐竹林,兰春斌,胥彬,等. 简化腔内Pringle法与传统Pringle法在腹腔镜肝切除术中安全性及有效性前瞻性对比研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(2):191-194.
[5]
Huang JWSu WLWang SN. Alternative Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Pringle Maneuver by Huang's Loop[J]. World J Surg201842(10):3312-3315.
[6]
穆振国,郭见光,郝金成. 保留半肝动脉血供的肝血流阻断技术应用观察[J]. 山东医药200545(36):55-56.
[7]
赵欣,雷泽华,高峰畏,等. 肝下下腔静脉阻断联合Pringle阻断在肝切除术中安全性及有效性的荟萃分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志201925(10):728-732.
[8]
宋晨鑫,丛明华,邹宝华,等. 肝癌肝部分切除术后并发感染危险因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志201833(10):1593-1596.
[9]
Laurenzi ACherqui DFigueroa R,et al. Totally intra-corporeal Pringle maneuver during laparoscopic liver resection[J]. HPB201820(2):128-131.
[10]
徐霞. 保留半肝动脉血流阻断法在肝细胞癌手术中的意义[J]. 肝脏201823(2):159-162.
[11]
黄安华,黄伟. Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法在肝癌切除术中的应用[J].中国现代普通外科进展201619(7):570-572.
[12]
邓仲鸣,赵云,孔雕雕,等. 低中心静脉压的腹腔镜肝切除术在原发性肝癌患者中应用效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(4):389-391.
[13]
Pomacu MMTrască MDPădureanu V,et al. Interrelation of inflammation and oxidative stress in liver cirrhosis[J]. Exp Ther Med202121(6):602.
[14]
Rezzani RFranco C. Liver,Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Syndromes[J]. Nutrients202113(2):301.
[15]
周禄科,杨洁,刘林,等. 腹腔镜下肝切除与开腹肝切除术对原发性大肝癌患者远期疗效、胃肠功能及氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志202127(3):27-33.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要