切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 437 -439. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.04.023

论著

内镜下难治性胆总管结石行ERCP取石的安全性研究
陈家先1, 宋春1, 段春宁1, 孙建伟1,()   
  1. 1. 745000 甘肃省庆阳市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-24 出版日期:2021-08-17
  • 通信作者: 孙建伟

Safety study of ERCP for endoscopic refractory choledocholithiasis

Jiaxian Chen1, Chun Song1, Chunning Duan1, Jianwei Sun1,()   

  1. 1. General Surgery Department, Qingyang People’s Hospital Qingyang City, Gansu Province 745000, China
  • Received:2020-06-24 Published:2021-08-17
  • Corresponding author: Jianwei Sun
  • Supported by:
    Qingyang City Science and Technology Innovation Project 2019(2019-021); Gansu Natural Science Foundation Project(1806 RJBZA173); Gansu province health industry scientific research plan management project(GWGL-2017-24)
引用本文:

陈家先, 宋春, 段春宁, 孙建伟. 内镜下难治性胆总管结石行ERCP取石的安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 437-439.

Jiaxian Chen, Chun Song, Chunning Duan, Jianwei Sun. Safety study of ERCP for endoscopic refractory choledocholithiasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 437-439.

目的

探讨内镜下难治性胆总管结石行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)取石的效果及安全性。

方法

对2017年1月至2019年6月期间收治的92例胆总管结石患者进行前瞻性研究,采用随机数字表法将患者分为ERCP组和LCBDE(腹腔镜胆总管探查术)组,每组各46例。采用SPSS20.0软件进行数据处理,肝功能指标等计量资料采用独立t检验,两组取石成功率和并发症发生率等计数资料采用χ2检验;P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

ERCP组一次取石成功率为82.6%(38/46),二次取石成功率为71.4%(5/7),总取石成功率为93.5%(43/46),机械碎石使用率为82.6%(38/46);LCBDE组一次性取石成功率为73.9%(34/46),二次取石成功率为72.7%(8/11),总取石成功率为91.3%(42/46),机械碎石使用率为76.1%(35/46)。两组取石成功率及机械碎石使用率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后7 d谷草转氨酶(AST)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、总胆红素(TBIL)水平均低于术前水平(P<0.05);术后7 d ERCP组ALT、AST、TBIL水平明显低于LCBDE组(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

ECRP取石术治疗难治性胆总管结石安全有效,在改善患者围术期情况更具优势,且促进术后恢复。

Objective

To investigate the effect and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for refractory common bile duct stones.

Methods

A prospective study of 92 patients with choledocholithiasis admitted from January 2017 to June 2019 was conducted. The patients were divided into ERCP group and LCBDE group by random number table method. There were 46 cases in each group. SPSS20.0 software was used for data processing. Independent sample t test was used for the measurement data of liver function indicators in the two groups. Fisher’s exact probability test or χ2 test were used for the data of lithotomy success rate and complication rate in the two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the ERCP group, the success rate of one-time stone extraction was 82.6% (38/46), the success rate of second-time stone extraction was 71.4% (5/7), the total success rate of stone extraction was 93.5% (43/46), and the use rate of mechanical crushed stone was 82.6% (38/46); In the LBDEL group, the one-time stone extraction success rate was 73.9% (34/46), the second-time stone extraction success rate was 72.7% (8/11), the total stone extraction success rate was 91.3% (42/46), and the use rate of mechanical crushed stone was 76.1% (35/46). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the success rate of stone removal and the utilization rate of mechanical gravel (P>0.05). The level of ALT, AST, and TBIL at 7 days after operation in the two groups was lower than the preoperative level, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The levels of ALT, AST and TBIL in ERCP group were significantly lower than those in LBDEL group 7 days after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

ECRP lithotripsy is safe and effective in refractory choledocholithiasis. It is similar to laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. ERCP has more advantages in improving patients’ perioperative conditions and promoting postoperative recovery.

表1 92例肝总管结石患者不同术式两组一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 92例肝总管结石患者不同术式两组患者取石成功率比较[%(例)]
表3 92例肝总管结石患者不同术式两组患者术前术后7 d肝功指标比较(±s)
表4 92例肝总管结石患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Zhu J, Sun G, Hong L, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(12): 4893-4899.
[2]
罗浩,孙竹峰,万柳华,等. 两种组合微创技术治疗胆总管结石比较的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(2):143-149.
[3]
Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, et al. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones(CBDS)[J]. Gut, 2017, 66(5): 765-782.
[4]
陆磊,金杭斌,杨晶,等. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在完全性内脏反位中的临床应用价值[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(3):205-208.
[5]
Chuang S-H, Hung M-C, Huang S-W, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in 101 consecutive patients: choledochotomy, transcystic, and transfistulous approaches[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(1): 485-497.
[6]
Toppi JT, Johnson MA, Page P, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: utilization and usefulness in suspected choledocholithiasis[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2016, 86 (12) : 1028-1032.
[7]
Laborda TJ, Jensen MK, Kavan M, et al. Treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis in children[J]. World J Hepatol, 2019, 11(1): 19-36.
[8]
吴波,彭慈军,冯赞杰,等. 直径≥10mm胆总管结石手术治疗研究进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2019,39(10):1107-1110.
[9]
冉文斌,李婕琳,甘洁婷,等. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗肝硬化合并胆胰疾病的价值[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(2):121-124.
[10]
李晓飞. 腹腔镜胆道探查取石术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆管结石的疗效比较[J]. 医学理论与实践,2019,32(19):3102-3103.
[11]
谷化剑,郭宇廷,韩民,等. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术与腹腔镜胆道手术在肝内外胆管结石治疗中的疗效评价[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2017,23(8):32-37.
[12]
张鹏,艾力曼·马合木提,孙娟. 心肌能量代谢与慢性心力衰竭心室重构关系及心肌能量代谢药物应用的研究进展[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2018,32(1):94-97.
[13]
何国筛,陈小雪,谭海扬. 内镜下十二指肠乳头小切开联合球囊扩张治疗难治性胆总管结石近期疗效观察[J]. 海南医学,2017,28(20):3306-3308.
[14]
宋晓晖,杨志平. 高龄胆总管结石患者行ERCP取石的临床疗效分析[J]. 吉林医药学院学报,2020,41(2):84-86.
[15]
Sisk JM, Choi MD, Casabianca AB, et al. Two Cardiac Arrests Because of Venous Air Embolism During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Case Report[J]. A A Case Rep, 2017, 8(3): 47-50.
[1] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[12] 姜宁宁, 蔺艳丽, 陈惠明. 胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.
[13] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[14] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[15] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
阅读次数
全文


摘要