切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 531 -534. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.017

论著

胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究
姜宁宁1, 蔺艳丽1, 陈惠明1,()   
  1. 1. 710065 西安,陕西省康复医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-05 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 陈惠明

Clinical study on the application of "three-needle" suture scheme in laparoscopic choledocholithiasis

Ningning Jiang1, Yanli Lin1, Huiming Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Rehabilitation Hospital, Xi'an Shaanxi province 710065, China
  • Received:2024-01-05 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Huiming Chen
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi Province Key R& D Program Project(2021SF-150)
引用本文:

姜宁宁, 蔺艳丽, 陈惠明. 胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.

Ningning Jiang, Yanli Lin, Huiming Chen. Clinical study on the application of "three-needle" suture scheme in laparoscopic choledocholithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.

目的

探讨胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的效果。

方法

前瞻性选取2020年6月至2023年5月接受腹腔镜胆总管探查术的胆总管结石患者105例,依据随机数字表法分为常规组(采用常规胆总管缝合术)53例与三针组(采用“三针法”缝合胆总管)52例。采用SPSS25.0软件分析数据,手术相关指标、术后恢复情况、术后疼痛情况等计量资料采用()表示,行独立样本t检验;计数资料并发症发生情况行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

三针组胆总管缝合时间、手术时间均短于常规组(P<0.05);两组患者术后引流管拔除时间、术后下床活动时间、住院时间、医疗费用、术后1d、3d的视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和术后并发症总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但三针组胆瘘发生率低于常规组(P<0.05)。

结论

采用“三针法”缝合方案可缩短胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术的缝合时间及手术时间,降低术后胆瘘发生率,且不会增加医疗费用,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the effect of "three-needle" suture in laparoscopic choledocholithiasis.

Methods

A total of 105 patients with choledocholithiasis who received laparoscopic choledochal exploration from June 2020 to May 2023 were prospectively selected and divided into the conventional group (with conventional choledochal suture) (53 cases) and the three-needle group (with "three-needle suture") (52 cases) according to random number table method. SPSS25.0 software was used to analyze the data. Surgical indicators, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain and other measurement data were expressed by (), and independent sample t test was performed. The incidence of complications was examined by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The time of common bile duct suture and operation in the three-needle group were shorter than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative ambulation time, hospital stay, medical cost, visual analogue pain scale (VAS) of 1d and 3d after surgery and the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05), but the incidence of biliary fistula in the three-needle group was lower than that in the conventional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The "three-needle" suture scheme can shorten the suture time and operation time of laparoscopic choledocholithiasis in patients with choledocholithiasis, reduce the incidence of postoperative biliary fistula, and does not increase medical costs, and is worthy of clinical application.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者手术相关指标比较(
表3 两组患者术后恢复情况及医疗费用比较(
表4 两组患者术后疼痛情况比较(分,
表5 两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Zhang JLing X.Risk factors and management of primary choledocholithiasis: a systematic review[J].ANZ J Surg2021,91(4):530-536.
[2]
杨小明,薛兰凤,陈羽,等.床边急诊ERCP治疗胆总管结石所致重型急性胆管炎的初步探索[J].现代消化及介入诊疗2022,27(03):344-346.
[3]
付强,尹志朋,周大臣,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的疗效分析[J].肝胆外科杂志2022,30(03):217-220.
[4]
单昆昆,陈旭光,张曼,等.上腹部手术后行腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石临床观察[J].疑难病杂志2022,21(09):932-937.
[5]
Ma ZZhou JYao L,et al.Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review[J].Surg Endosc2022,36(1):718-727.
[6]
牟秀芳,丁建华,王强,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查取石和胆管一期缝合术后胆瘘的防治策略[J].中国医刊2021,56(02):150-153.
[7]
付振东,上官建营,肖毅,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合术后胆漏的分析[J].西北国防医学杂志2021,42(05):356-360.
[8]
王方华,丁雄,龚建平,等.三针连续缝合法在改良腹腔镜胆道探查T管引流术中的应用(附78例报告)[J].腹腔镜外科杂志2020,25(10):744-747.
[9]
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗,等.外科学(第9版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:440-442.
[10]
Reed MDVan Nostran W.Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: a plea for uniformity[J].J Clin Pharmacol2014,54(3):241-244.
[11]
张乾,肖瑞,杨景瑞,等.腹腔镜下胆道探查取石T管引流优化术的临床应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2021,15(02):211-214.
[12]
陆文熊,张冬生,傅赞.对腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合术的再认识[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2021,15(01):49-52.
[13]
月胜,党政,范瑞芳,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后拔除T管出现胆漏的诊治分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志2023,32(06):670-672.
[14]
Zhang DMa YSun W,et al.Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study[J].Updates Surg2023,75(4):897-903.
[15]
Wang LHou HZhou D,et al.Factors Influencing Suture Difficulty of T-tube Fixation and Closure in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2022,32(3):368-372.
[16]
赵鹏举,艾可为,马艳,等.两种胆总管缝合技术在腹腔镜胆总管结石手术中的应用比较[J].重庆医学2020,49(03):447-450.
[17]
陈殿玉,唐俊伟,徐全宏.两种缝合方式在腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合中的效果比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志2022,27(07):535-538.
[18]
孟维山,苏忠,吴维兴.胆总管结石患者术后T淋巴亚群变化及其与术后发生感染的关系[J].川北医学院学报2023,38(05):652-655.
[19]
Darkahi BNordén TSandblom G.Fibrin Sealant for Prevention of Bile Leakage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Incision: Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Trial[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2022,32(2):171-175.
[20]
贾冉,钱叶本,张超,等.腹腔镜胆总管一期缝合术与T管引流术的临床疗效比较[J].肝胆外科杂志2021,29(04):262-264.
[1] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[2] 刘军, 周代琴, 徐雪梅, 于仕杰. ERCP+EST+ENBD取石术对胆总管结石的疗效及安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 299-302.
[3] 张立一, 徐春晓, 单玉玺. sEST联合不同扩张时间EPBD治疗胆总管结石的随机临床试验[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 295-298.
[4] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[5] 张建波, 东爱华. 不同腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效及并发症对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 693-696.
[6] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[7] 滕达, 许悦, 张萌. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 537-542.
[8] 杨渝, 吕云福, 郑进方. 内镜下Oddi括约肌切开取石术后对胆囊功能影响的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 235-238.
[9] 陈昌雄, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石胆汁动力学研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 100-102.
[10] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石效果Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 45-50.
[11] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石微创治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 585-588.
[12] 周标, 陈达伟, 汤晓东, 陈胜, 刘双海, 邓志成. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管汇入部微切开取石在细径胆总管结石合并胆囊结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 422-426.
[13] 姚礼, 吴金秀, 唐流康, 谢峰. 胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 73-76.
[14] 冯其柱, 王思雨, 袁文康, 张超. 腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合在正常直径胆总管结石患者中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 68-72.
[15] 董浩, 张文刚, 刘圣圳, 李笑, 冯宇杰, 王佳凤, 赵晨怡, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 胆道镜直视下胆总管结石取出术的初步探索[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 92-96.
阅读次数
全文


摘要