切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 323 -326. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.024

所属专题: 文献

论著

肌间隙及咽后间隙入路法中央区切除术在甲状腺癌再次手术中的应用
邝亚辉1, 李梦奇1, 王智辉1, 陈洪生1,()   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-28 出版日期:2021-06-26
  • 通信作者: 陈洪生

The application of intermuscular and interthroat approaches in the reoperation of thyroid cancer

Yahui Kuang1, Mengqi Li1, Zhihui Wang1, Hongsheng Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang 150001, China
  • Received:2020-03-28 Published:2021-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Hongsheng Chen
  • Supported by:
    Heilongjiang provincial social development science and technology project(2018SF140)
引用本文:

邝亚辉, 李梦奇, 王智辉, 陈洪生. 肌间隙及咽后间隙入路法中央区切除术在甲状腺癌再次手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 323-326.

Yahui Kuang, Mengqi Li, Zhihui Wang, Hongsheng Chen. The application of intermuscular and interthroat approaches in the reoperation of thyroid cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 323-326.

目的

研究肌间隙及咽后间隙入路法中央区切除术在甲状腺癌再次手术中的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年7月至2019年6月81例行甲状腺癌再次手术的患者资料。根据手术方案将患者分为两组。传统组患者43例采用传统甲状腺中央区切除术,改良组患者38例采用肌间隙及咽后间隙入路法中央区切除术。使用统计学软件SPSS 24.0分析,围术期指标等计量资料采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验。以P<0.05为检验标准。

结果

两组在围术期指标比较中,手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间及术后第1天甲状旁激素恢复水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后声音嘶哑、饮水呛咳、吞咽困难、低钙血症的并发症比较中,两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访4~22个月,平均随访11.6个月,两组患者随访期间,均无死亡以及复发病例。所有患者的甲状旁腺素在术后1~3个月均逐渐恢复正常,无永久性甲状旁腺功能低下及永久性喉返神经损伤发生。

结论

在甲状腺再次手术中,以肌间隙及咽后间隙入路,在甲状腺背侧区域进行手术,安全可行,且效果满意,值得在临床推荐使用。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcome of intermuscular and interthroat approaches in the reoperation of thyroid cancer.

Methods

From July 2017 to June 2019, a retrospective analysis were performed in 81 patients who underwent reoperation for thyroid cancer. According to the operation procedures, 43 patients who treated with traditional central thyroidectomy were divided into the traditional group, while38 patients who treated with central thyroidectomy with intermuscular and interthroat approaches were divided into the improved group. Statistical software SPSS24.0 were used for data analysis. Measurement data such as Perioperative indexes were represented as (±s), and were examined by independent t test. Chi-square test were performed for count data analysis such as complication rate. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

There were no significant difference between the Improved group and the traditional group in terms of the perioperative indexes, such as the operation time, the amount of bleeding during the operation, the postoperative hospital stay and the recovery level of parathyroid hormone on the first day after the operation (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the Improved group and the traditional group in terms of postoperative complications such as hoarseness, water choking, dysphagia and hypocalcemia (P>0.05). Postoperative followed-up of 4-22 months were performed (with average of 11.6 months ). During the follow-up period, there was no death or recurrence in both groups. The parathyroid hormone of all patients gradually returned to normal 1-3 months after operation, and there was no permanent hypoparathyroidism or permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.

Conclusion

In the reoperation of thyroid cancer, it is safe and feasible to operate in the dorsal area of thyroid gland through intermuscular and interthroat approaches, and the clinical outcome is satisfactory, which is worth recommending in clinical practice.

表1 81例甲状腺癌再次手术患者不同术式两组一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 81例甲状腺癌再次手术患者不同术式两组患者围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 81例甲状腺癌再次手术患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
王宁,刘硕,杨雷,等. 2018全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD]. 肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志,2019,5(1): 87-97.
[2]
McGuire S. World cancer report 2014.Geneva, Switzerland:World Health Organization, international agency for research on cancer,WHO press,2015[J]. Adv Nutr,2016,7(2): 418-419.
[3]
代金,吴靖芳,薛刚. 甲状腺癌的诊断现状[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2018,34(8): 57-60.
[4]
Cabanillas ME, McFadden DG, Durante C. Thyroid cancer[J]. Lancet,2016,388(10061): 2783-2795.
[5]
Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S,et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China in 2013:an analysis based on urbanization level[J]. Chin J Cancer Res,2017,29(1): 1-10.
[6]
郑绪才,王圣应,朱正志,等. 分化型甲状腺癌再次手术的临床分析[J]. 安徽医学,2015,36(9): 1074-1076.
[7]
王莎飞. 甲状腺癌不规范手术后再手术相关问题的探讨[J]. 基层医学论坛,2015,19(31): 4349-4350.
[8]
许德斌,吕云霞,陈万志,等. 甲状腺癌再次手术的原因及手术方案分析[J]. 江西医药,2016,51(6): 524-525,526.
[9]
Boschin IM, Pelizzo MR, Giammarile F,et al. Lymphoscintigraphy in differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Clin Nucl Med,2015,40(7): e343-e350.
[10]
Liang J, Li Z, Fang F,et al. Is prophylactic central neck dissection necessary for cN0 differentiated thyroid cancer patients at initial treatment?A meta-analysis of the literature[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2017,37(1): 1-8.
[11]
中华医学会内分泌学分会,中华医学会外科学分会内分泌学组,中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会,等. 甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013,33(2): 96-115.
[12]
中国抗癌协会甲状腺癌专业委员会(CATO). 甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2016版) [J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2016,43(10): 405-411.
[13]
Zhou HY, He JC, McHenry CR. Inadvertent parathyroidectomy:incidence,risk factors,and outcomes[J]. J Surg Res,2016,205(1): 70-75.
[14]
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC,et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The Amercan Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid,2016,26(1): 1-133.
[15]
程若川,刘文. 再次手术中央区淋巴结清扫中甲状旁腺保护的难点及策略[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017,24(10): 1173-1179.
[1] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[2] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[3] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[4] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[5] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[6] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[7] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[8] 孙辉, 李长霖. 分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除术中的关键考量与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 477-481.
[9] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[10] 李云龙, 夏旭良, 江志强, 刘伟, 刘凯, 唐立, 刘昊中, 张思远. 三种方法治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 487-489.
[11] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[12] 蔡永芹, 王君菊, 张敬敬. 不同下纵隔淋巴结清扫顺序在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中应用效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[13] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[14] 周迪, 全志伟. 规范化胆囊良性疾病诊治流程减少胆囊癌误诊误治[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 749-753.
[15] 王晓梅, 刘宇, 董金磊, 刘凡孝, 王成龙, 李连欣. 单一前方入路内固定对肱骨近端骨折合并肱骨头后脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 319-325.
阅读次数
全文


摘要