切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 327 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.025

所属专题: 文献

论著

基于不同入路的完全腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌的临床疗效研究
余宁1,(), 张红岩2, 徐祥斌1, 徐玉林1, 马小鹏2, 孙团起3   
  1. 1. 236800 安徽省亳州市人民医院甲状腺外科
    2. 230001 中国科学技术大学第一附属医院(安徽省立医院)
    3. 200032 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2021-06-26
  • 通信作者: 余宁

The clinical effect of complete endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer based on different approaches

Ning Yu1,(), Hongyan Zhang2, Xiangbin Xu1, Yulin Xu1, Xiaopeng Ma2, Tuanqi Sun3   

  1. 1. Department of Thyroid Surgery, Bozhou People’s Hospital, Anhui province 236800
    2. The first affiliated hospital of university of science and technology of China (Anhui provincial hospital)
    3. Affiliated cancer hospital of Fudan university, 200032
  • Received:2020-04-22 Published:2021-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Ning Yu
  • Supported by:
    Anhui Health and Family Planning Commission funded projects.(2018WJ141)
引用本文:

余宁, 张红岩, 徐祥斌, 徐玉林, 马小鹏, 孙团起. 基于不同入路的完全腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 327-330.

Ning Yu, Hongyan Zhang, Xiangbin Xu, Yulin Xu, Xiaopeng Ma, Tuanqi Sun. The clinical effect of complete endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer based on different approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 327-330.

目的

探讨不同入路手术的完全腔镜甲状腺切除术(CET)治疗甲状腺癌的应用效果。

方法

选取2017年3月至2019年2月90例接受CET治疗的甲状腺癌患者作为研究对象,并采用随机数表法分为腋乳组和胸乳组,各45例。采用统计软件SPSS 21.00进行数据分析,围术期各项指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;总满意度、并发症发生情况采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验。P<0.05为有差异统计学意义。

结果

腋乳组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、引流时间、术后住院时间、检出淋巴结个数等围术期指标均优于胸乳组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腋乳组术后并发症发生率(11.1%)低于胸乳组(31.1%),患者总满意度(97.8%)高于胸乳组(80.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者随访期间均无复发等情况发生。

结论

改良腋乳入路相比胸乳入路具有手术时间短,术后引流液少,拔管时间短,患者满意度高,愈后良好等优点,可在临床推广使用。

Objective

To investigate the effect of complete endoscopic thyroidectomy (CET) with different approaches in the treatment of thyroid cancer.

Methods

A total of 90 thyroid cancer patients receiving CET treatment from March 2017 to February 2019 were selected as the research subjects, and randomly divided into axillary breast group and thoracic breast group, with 45 cases in each group, using random number table method. Data analysis with statistical software SPSS 21.00. Perioperative indicators were expressed as (±s), the independent t test was used. The total satisfaction and the incidence of complications were tested by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The perioperative indexes of axillary breast group, such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, drainage time, postoperative hospital stay and the number of lymph nodes detected, were better than those of thoracic breast group, with statistical significance(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the axillary breast milk group (11.1%) was lower than that in the breast milk group (31.1%), and the total satisfaction of patients (97.8%) was higher than that in the breast milk group (80.0%), with statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no recurrence in the two groups during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared with the thoracic approach, the modified axillary approach has the advantages of shorter operation time, less postoperative drainage fluid, shorter extubation time, higher patient satisfaction and better recovery, which can be widely used in clinical practice.

表1 90例甲状腺癌患者接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 90例甲状腺癌患者接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者围术期情况比较(±s)
表3 90例接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较(例)
表4 90例甲状腺癌患者接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者满意度情况比较(例)
[1]
王虎,杨洁,王伟霖,等.甲状腺微小癌的外科手术治疗研究[J].癌症进展,2017,15(10): 1162-1164,1220.
[2]
Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES,et al.Comparison of Robotic versus Conventional Selective Neck Dissection and Total Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2016,154( 6): 1005-1013.
[3]
张海斌,张勇,卢启国.完全腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术与传统开放手术在甲状腺癌治疗中的应用效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(30): 33-34.
[4]
孙小亮,鲁瑶,杨猛,等.经胸乳途径行腔镜甲状腺手术的临床体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(6): 401-403.
[5]
姜舒文,孙鹏,关炳生,等.腔镜甲状腺手术的发展历程与进展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(4): 241-244.
[6]
何高飞,章德广,高力.腔镜甲状腺外科的现状与发展[J].重庆医科大学学报,2018,43(12): 1582-1585.
[7]
He Q, Zhu J, Zhuang D,et al.[Robotic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection using axillo-bilateral-breast approach:a comparison to open conventional approach][J]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi,2016,54(1): 51-55.
[8]
孙莎莎,臧传善,邱杰,等.腔镜甲状腺手术的研究进展[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2018,32(5): 103-109.
[9]
Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES,et al. Robotic-assisted selective and modified radical neck dissection in head and nedk cancer patients[J]. Int J Surg,2016,25: 24-30.
[10]
任小婷,洪晓明.胸乳入路腔镜技术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床研究进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(12): 1121-1125.
[11]
Yu J, Rao S, Lin Z,et al.The learning curve of endoscopic thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma:CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon’s experience[J].Surg Endosc,2019,33(4): 1284-1289.
[12]
傅锦波,罗晔哲,洪晓泉,等.经腋窝入路与经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(8): 688-690.
[13]
杜金平.经胸乳入路腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术对手术相关指标及术后并发症的影响[J].实用医技杂志,2019,26(2): 212-214.
[14]
江宏伟,王翠,周勇.全腔镜手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(6): 631-633.
[15]
李全,张景华,宋冀涛,等.改良经胸入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的临床效果及安全性研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(1),73-76.
[1] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[2] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[3] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[4] 黄崇植, 肖映胜, 杨熙鸿, 林炘. 甲状腺下动脉的上行分支在甲状腺术中定位喉返神经的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 607-610.
[5] 袁育韬, 邢金琳, 谢克飞, 殷凯. CT征象及BRAFV600E基因突变与甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-614.
[6] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[9] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[10] 樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[13] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[14] 徐成, 王璐璐, 王少华. 洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌转移淋巴结中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 701-704.
[15] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
阅读次数
全文


摘要