切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 327 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.025

所属专题: 文献

论著

基于不同入路的完全腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌的临床疗效研究
余宁1,(), 张红岩2, 徐祥斌1, 徐玉林1, 马小鹏2, 孙团起3   
  1. 1. 236800 安徽省亳州市人民医院甲状腺外科
    2. 230001 中国科学技术大学第一附属医院(安徽省立医院)
    3. 200032 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2021-06-26
  • 通信作者: 余宁

The clinical effect of complete endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer based on different approaches

Ning Yu1,(), Hongyan Zhang2, Xiangbin Xu1, Yulin Xu1, Xiaopeng Ma2, Tuanqi Sun3   

  1. 1. Department of Thyroid Surgery, Bozhou People’s Hospital, Anhui province 236800
    2. The first affiliated hospital of university of science and technology of China (Anhui provincial hospital)
    3. Affiliated cancer hospital of Fudan university, 200032
  • Received:2020-04-22 Published:2021-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Ning Yu
  • Supported by:
    Anhui Health and Family Planning Commission funded projects.(2018WJ141)
引用本文:

余宁, 张红岩, 徐祥斌, 徐玉林, 马小鹏, 孙团起. 基于不同入路的完全腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌的临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 327-330.

Ning Yu, Hongyan Zhang, Xiangbin Xu, Yulin Xu, Xiaopeng Ma, Tuanqi Sun. The clinical effect of complete endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer based on different approaches[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 327-330.

目的

探讨不同入路手术的完全腔镜甲状腺切除术(CET)治疗甲状腺癌的应用效果。

方法

选取2017年3月至2019年2月90例接受CET治疗的甲状腺癌患者作为研究对象,并采用随机数表法分为腋乳组和胸乳组,各45例。采用统计软件SPSS 21.00进行数据分析,围术期各项指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;总满意度、并发症发生情况采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验。P<0.05为有差异统计学意义。

结果

腋乳组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、引流时间、术后住院时间、检出淋巴结个数等围术期指标均优于胸乳组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腋乳组术后并发症发生率(11.1%)低于胸乳组(31.1%),患者总满意度(97.8%)高于胸乳组(80.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者随访期间均无复发等情况发生。

结论

改良腋乳入路相比胸乳入路具有手术时间短,术后引流液少,拔管时间短,患者满意度高,愈后良好等优点,可在临床推广使用。

Objective

To investigate the effect of complete endoscopic thyroidectomy (CET) with different approaches in the treatment of thyroid cancer.

Methods

A total of 90 thyroid cancer patients receiving CET treatment from March 2017 to February 2019 were selected as the research subjects, and randomly divided into axillary breast group and thoracic breast group, with 45 cases in each group, using random number table method. Data analysis with statistical software SPSS 21.00. Perioperative indicators were expressed as (±s), the independent t test was used. The total satisfaction and the incidence of complications were tested by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The perioperative indexes of axillary breast group, such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, drainage time, postoperative hospital stay and the number of lymph nodes detected, were better than those of thoracic breast group, with statistical significance(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the axillary breast milk group (11.1%) was lower than that in the breast milk group (31.1%), and the total satisfaction of patients (97.8%) was higher than that in the breast milk group (80.0%), with statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no recurrence in the two groups during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared with the thoracic approach, the modified axillary approach has the advantages of shorter operation time, less postoperative drainage fluid, shorter extubation time, higher patient satisfaction and better recovery, which can be widely used in clinical practice.

表1 90例甲状腺癌患者接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 90例甲状腺癌患者接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者围术期情况比较(±s)
表3 90例接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较(例)
表4 90例甲状腺癌患者接受CET治疗不同入路两组患者满意度情况比较(例)
[1]
王虎,杨洁,王伟霖,等.甲状腺微小癌的外科手术治疗研究[J].癌症进展,2017,15(10): 1162-1164,1220.
[2]
Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES,et al.Comparison of Robotic versus Conventional Selective Neck Dissection and Total Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2016,154( 6): 1005-1013.
[3]
张海斌,张勇,卢启国.完全腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术与传统开放手术在甲状腺癌治疗中的应用效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(30): 33-34.
[4]
孙小亮,鲁瑶,杨猛,等.经胸乳途径行腔镜甲状腺手术的临床体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(6): 401-403.
[5]
姜舒文,孙鹏,关炳生,等.腔镜甲状腺手术的发展历程与进展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(4): 241-244.
[6]
何高飞,章德广,高力.腔镜甲状腺外科的现状与发展[J].重庆医科大学学报,2018,43(12): 1582-1585.
[7]
He Q, Zhu J, Zhuang D,et al.[Robotic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection using axillo-bilateral-breast approach:a comparison to open conventional approach][J]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi,2016,54(1): 51-55.
[8]
孙莎莎,臧传善,邱杰,等.腔镜甲状腺手术的研究进展[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2018,32(5): 103-109.
[9]
Song CM, Ji YB, Sung ES,et al. Robotic-assisted selective and modified radical neck dissection in head and nedk cancer patients[J]. Int J Surg,2016,25: 24-30.
[10]
任小婷,洪晓明.胸乳入路腔镜技术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床研究进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(12): 1121-1125.
[11]
Yu J, Rao S, Lin Z,et al.The learning curve of endoscopic thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma:CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon’s experience[J].Surg Endosc,2019,33(4): 1284-1289.
[12]
傅锦波,罗晔哲,洪晓泉,等.经腋窝入路与经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(8): 688-690.
[13]
杜金平.经胸乳入路腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术对手术相关指标及术后并发症的影响[J].实用医技杂志,2019,26(2): 212-214.
[14]
江宏伟,王翠,周勇.全腔镜手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(6): 631-633.
[15]
李全,张景华,宋冀涛,等.改良经胸入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的临床效果及安全性研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(1),73-76.
[1] 陈镁仪, 李伊尧, 张梦圆, 许杰, 马若凡, 李登, 顾菁. 图示化自主髋关节功能评分系统的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 320-328.
[2] 邵小丽, 林燕, 张玲玲, 韩亚琴. 超声引导下子宫肌瘤注射聚桂醇硬化术联合术后米非司酮治疗临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 353-360.
[3] 王伟伟, 费建平, 王璋瑜. 不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.
[4] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[5] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[8] 孙辉, 李长霖. 分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除术中的关键考量与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 477-481.
[9] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[10] 李云龙, 夏旭良, 江志强, 刘伟, 刘凯, 唐立, 刘昊中, 张思远. 三种方法治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 487-489.
[11] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[12] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[13] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[14] 何羽. 腔镜微创手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-458.
[15] 宋红霞, 吴玩呈. 内镜下甲状腺手术切口入路发展的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 470-472.
阅读次数
全文


摘要