切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良SPLT吻合的腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果研究
任雁1, 钟萍2,(), 肖江卫1, 朱超1   
  1. 1. 610500 成都,成都医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科
    2. 610500 成都,成都医学院第一附属医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 钟萍

Clinical analysis of modified SPLT anastomosis in laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer

Yan Ren1, Ping Zhong2,(), Jiangwei Xiao1, Chao Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan 610500, China
    2. Department of Nursing, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan 610500, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Ping Zhong
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81070378)
引用本文:

任雁, 钟萍, 肖江卫, 朱超. 改良SPLT吻合的腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 162-165.

Yan Ren, Ping Zhong, Jiangwei Xiao, Chao Zhu. Clinical analysis of modified SPLT anastomosis in laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 162-165.

目的

探究改良自牵引后离断食管空肠(SPLT)吻合的腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2016年4月至2019年10月间接受腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗的96例进展期胃癌患者资料,按照消化道重建吻合方式不同分为两组:行改良SPLT吻合设为改良组;行食管空肠roux-en-y吻合设为传统组,每组48例。采用SPSS23.0进行统计学分析,其中术中和术后情况、疼痛量表评分等计量资料(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

改良组患者的手术时间、吻合时间、术中出血量、术后首次排便时间、首次进食时间、首次下床活动时间和术后5 d疼痛评分均明显少于传统组(P<0.05);改良组术后总并发症发生率为10.4%低于传统组27.1%(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术患者行改良SPLT吻合方法安全可靠,与传统方法比,具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后疼痛轻和并发症少的优势。

Objective

To explore the clinical outcome of laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy with self-pulling and transected esophagojejunostomy (SPLT) anastomosis for advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Retrospective analysis were performed on the data of 96 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy from April 2016 to October 2019. According to different anastomosis methods, the patients were divided into two groups: the patients in the improved group received modified SPLT anastomosis, while Roux-en-Y anastomosis were performed in the traditional group. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS23.0 software., Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative conditions, pain scale score were expressed as and were analyzed by using t test. Complications were tested by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operative time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first defecation time, first feeding time, first ambulation time and postoperative pain score on POD5 were significantly lower in the improved group than those in the traditional group respectively (P<0.05). The postoperative complications incidence of 10.4% in the improved group was lower than 27.1% in the traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional methods, laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients by using modified SPLT anastomosis is safe and reliable, it has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain and complications.

表1 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法两组患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法两组术中术后指标比较(±s)
表3 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法两组患者疼痛评分比较(±s)
表4 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法术后两组患者并发症水平比较(例)
[1]
Shan F, Gao C, Li X-L, et al. Short-and Long-Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(7): 713-722.
[2]
Gur EO, Karaisli S, Kamer E, et al. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and the Effect on Survival in Early Gastric Cancer Patients with Radical Gastric Resection[J]. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul, 2019, 53(4): 371-378.
[3]
Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J, et al.Randomized Controlled Trial to evaluate splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2): 277-283.
[4]
党鹏远,张淋,张伟,等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治术联合胃背侧系膜近胃端完整系膜切除术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2020,34(1):20-23.
[5]
Guo YL, Gao YH, Che GJ, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Open Simultmieous Resections of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(2): 192-200.
[6]
Shen QY, Yang CS, Wang JS, et al. Application of intracorporeal uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2019, 22(1): 43-48.
[7]
Ward MA, Ujiki MB.Creation of a Jejunal Pouch During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Esophagojejunostomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(1): 184-186.
[8]
国家卫生健康委员会. 胃癌诊疗规范(2018年版)[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版),2019,9(3):118-144.
[9]
Li ZY, Liu YZ, Bai B, et al. Surgical and Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43(2): 594-603.
[10]
Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, et al. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer[J] .World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(18): 2232-2246.
[11]
Ye S-P, Shi J, Liu D-N, et al. Robotic-versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching: short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 6502.
[12]
刘晓平.进展期胃癌行腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术的临床研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2018:1-93.
[13]
Gunji H, Hoshino I, Kawahara K, et al. Laparoscopic Gastro-Jejunostomy Using the Overlap Method after Subtotal Gastrectomy for Upper Gastric Cancer[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2019, 46(13): 2195-2197.
[14]
武锋.完全腹腔镜与开腹全胃D2根治术治疗局部进展期胃上部癌近期疗效对比研究[D].太原:山西医科大学,2019:1-34.
[15]
蒿汉坤,洪军,王雅平,等. 自牵引后离断食管-空肠吻合术100例安全性评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(2):206-211.
[1] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[4] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[5] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[6] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[13] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[14] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[15] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES Ⅳ式)中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
阅读次数
全文


摘要