切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良SPLT吻合的腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果研究
任雁1, 钟萍2,(), 肖江卫1, 朱超1   
  1. 1. 610500 成都,成都医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科
    2. 610500 成都,成都医学院第一附属医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 钟萍

Clinical analysis of modified SPLT anastomosis in laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer

Yan Ren1, Ping Zhong2,(), Jiangwei Xiao1, Chao Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan 610500, China
    2. Department of Nursing, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan 610500, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Ping Zhong
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81070378)
引用本文:

任雁, 钟萍, 肖江卫, 朱超. 改良SPLT吻合的腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 162-165.

Yan Ren, Ping Zhong, Jiangwei Xiao, Chao Zhu. Clinical analysis of modified SPLT anastomosis in laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 162-165.

目的

探究改良自牵引后离断食管空肠(SPLT)吻合的腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2016年4月至2019年10月间接受腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术治疗的96例进展期胃癌患者资料,按照消化道重建吻合方式不同分为两组:行改良SPLT吻合设为改良组;行食管空肠roux-en-y吻合设为传统组,每组48例。采用SPSS23.0进行统计学分析,其中术中和术后情况、疼痛量表评分等计量资料(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

改良组患者的手术时间、吻合时间、术中出血量、术后首次排便时间、首次进食时间、首次下床活动时间和术后5 d疼痛评分均明显少于传统组(P<0.05);改良组术后总并发症发生率为10.4%低于传统组27.1%(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜全胃癌切除D2根治术患者行改良SPLT吻合方法安全可靠,与传统方法比,具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后疼痛轻和并发症少的优势。

Objective

To explore the clinical outcome of laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy with self-pulling and transected esophagojejunostomy (SPLT) anastomosis for advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Retrospective analysis were performed on the data of 96 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy from April 2016 to October 2019. According to different anastomosis methods, the patients were divided into two groups: the patients in the improved group received modified SPLT anastomosis, while Roux-en-Y anastomosis were performed in the traditional group. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS23.0 software., Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative conditions, pain scale score were expressed as and were analyzed by using t test. Complications were tested by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operative time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first defecation time, first feeding time, first ambulation time and postoperative pain score on POD5 were significantly lower in the improved group than those in the traditional group respectively (P<0.05). The postoperative complications incidence of 10.4% in the improved group was lower than 27.1% in the traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional methods, laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients by using modified SPLT anastomosis is safe and reliable, it has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain and complications.

表1 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法两组患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法两组术中术后指标比较(±s)
表3 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法两组患者疼痛评分比较(±s)
表4 96例进展期胃癌患者D2根治术不同吻合方法术后两组患者并发症水平比较(例)
[1]
Shan F, Gao C, Li X-L, et al. Short-and Long-Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(7): 713-722.
[2]
Gur EO, Karaisli S, Kamer E, et al. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and the Effect on Survival in Early Gastric Cancer Patients with Radical Gastric Resection[J]. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul, 2019, 53(4): 371-378.
[3]
Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J, et al.Randomized Controlled Trial to evaluate splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2): 277-283.
[4]
党鹏远,张淋,张伟,等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治术联合胃背侧系膜近胃端完整系膜切除术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2020,34(1):20-23.
[5]
Guo YL, Gao YH, Che GJ, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Open Simultmieous Resections of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(2): 192-200.
[6]
Shen QY, Yang CS, Wang JS, et al. Application of intracorporeal uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2019, 22(1): 43-48.
[7]
Ward MA, Ujiki MB.Creation of a Jejunal Pouch During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Esophagojejunostomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(1): 184-186.
[8]
国家卫生健康委员会. 胃癌诊疗规范(2018年版)[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版),2019,9(3):118-144.
[9]
Li ZY, Liu YZ, Bai B, et al. Surgical and Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43(2): 594-603.
[10]
Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, et al. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer[J] .World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(18): 2232-2246.
[11]
Ye S-P, Shi J, Liu D-N, et al. Robotic-versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching: short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 6502.
[12]
刘晓平.进展期胃癌行腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术的临床研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2018:1-93.
[13]
Gunji H, Hoshino I, Kawahara K, et al. Laparoscopic Gastro-Jejunostomy Using the Overlap Method after Subtotal Gastrectomy for Upper Gastric Cancer[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2019, 46(13): 2195-2197.
[14]
武锋.完全腹腔镜与开腹全胃D2根治术治疗局部进展期胃上部癌近期疗效对比研究[D].太原:山西医科大学,2019:1-34.
[15]
蒿汉坤,洪军,王雅平,等. 自牵引后离断食管-空肠吻合术100例安全性评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(2):206-211.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要