切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 166 -169. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

老年胃癌患者腹腔镜根治术后肠麻痹的影响因素分析
吴清1, 陈海军1,(), 周进2   
  1. 1. 215300 江苏昆山,昆山市中医医院 普外科
    2. 215006 江苏苏州,苏州大学附属第一医院 普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-13 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 陈海军

Clinical analysis of the postoperative enteroplegia in senile patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic surgery

Qing Wu1, Haijun Chen1,(), Jin Zhou2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Jiangsu 215300, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Jiangsu 215006, China
  • Received:2020-03-13 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Haijun Chen
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81373534)
引用本文:

吴清, 陈海军, 周进. 老年胃癌患者腹腔镜根治术后肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 166-169.

Qing Wu, Haijun Chen, Jin Zhou. Clinical analysis of the postoperative enteroplegia in senile patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 166-169.

目的

分析老年胃癌患者腹腔镜根治术后肠麻痹的影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年7月两家医院收治的老年胃癌患者312例资料,所有患者均行腹腔镜根治术,依据肠麻痹诊断标准将患者分为肠麻痹组(128例)与非肠麻痹组(184例),数据采用SPSS20.0统计软件处理,两组患者术后肠麻痹的单因素分析采用χ2检验,对具有统计意义的单因素分析结果行多因素logistic回归分析,计算OR和95%可信区间。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

本组128例老年胃癌患者术后发生肠麻痹,占41.03%;184例术后未发生肠麻痹,占58.97%。单因素分析显示,肠麻痹组患者在年龄、术后体温、使用阿片类药物、TNM分期、手术持续时间、胃切除方式等方面与非肠麻痹组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,年龄≥65岁、术后体温≥38℃、使用阿片类药物、TNM分期≥Ⅲ期、手术持续时间≥4 h、胃部全切除是导致老年胃癌患者腹腔镜术后发生肠麻痹的危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05)。

结论

年龄≥65岁、术后体温、使用阿片类药物、TNM分期≥Ⅲ期、手术持续时间≥4h、胃部全切除是导致老年胃癌患者腹腔镜术后发生肠麻痹的危险因素,临床应做好预防措施,避免肠麻痹发生,改善患者预后效果。

Objective

To analyze the influencing factors of postoperative enteroplegia in senile patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

The data of 312 senile patients with gastric cancer, admitted to the two hospitals from January 2018 to July 2019, were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients underwent radical laparoscopic surgery, According to the diagnostic criteria of intestinal paralysis, the patients were divided into the intestinal paralysis group (128 cases) and the non-intestinal paralysis group (184 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS20.0 software. Univariate analysis of postoperative enteroplegia in the two groups were performed by using χ2 test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed for the statistically significant univariate analysis results, while OR and 95% confidence interval were calculated. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Postoperative enteroplegia occurred in 128 elderly patients (41.03%) with gastric cancer. No intestinal paralysis occurred in 184 cases (58.97%). Compared with the non-enteroplegia group, there were statistically significant differences in terms of age, postoperative body temperature, use of opioids, TNM staging, operative time and procedures (P<0.05). Multi-factor analysis showed that the age of ≥ 65, postoperative body temperature of ≥38 ℃, use of opioids, TNM staging of ≥Ⅲ, operative time of ≥ 4 h, total gastrectomy were risk factors of postoperative enteroplegia of elderly patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic surgery (OR>1, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Age of ≥ 65 years old, postoperative temperature, use of opioids, TNM staging of ≥ Ⅲ, duration of surgery of ≥4h, total gastrectomy are risk factors for enteroplegia after laparoscopic radical resection in senile gastric cancer patients. The preventive measures should be taken in clinical practice to avoid enteroplegia and improve the prognosis of patients.

表1 312例老年胃癌患者腹腔镜根治术后肠麻痹的单因素分析(例)
表2 312例老年胃癌患者腹腔镜根治术后肠麻痹的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
Ahmed A, Al-Tamimi DM. Incorporation of p-53 mutation status and Ki-67 proliferating index in classifying Her2-neu positive gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Libyan J Med, 2018, 13(1): 1466573.
[2]
Liang WQ, Li JY, Zhang W, et al. Prolonged postoperative ileus in gastric surgery: Is there any difference between laparoscopic and open surgery?[J]. Cancer Med, 2019, 8(12): 5515-5523.
[3]
李纯,温红玲. 自噬与凋亡在肠道病毒感染细胞过程中的影响及其相互作用[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2017,31(3):269-272.
[4]
Khan Z, Darr U, Abdel-Aziz Y, et al. First Case of Paralytic Intestinal Ileus After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Cecal Polyp: 2101[J]. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 112 (10): 1164-1166.
[5]
薛飞,时雨,赵爽.腹腔镜辅助与手辅助腹腔镜手术行胃癌根治术的效果比较[J].安徽医学,2018,39(1):99-102.
[6]
卫庆文,张梦娇,易丹.腹腔镜及开腹远端胃癌D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效及术后相关并发症的比较[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2017,22(1):82-85.
[7]
程康文,王贵和,束宽山,等.腹腔镜辅助与开腹胃癌根治术临床效果及对肠道屏障功能影响的比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(4):450-456.
[8]
江频,李栋梁,宋承鹏,等.根治性远端胃大部切除术后胃瘫发生的危险因素分析[J].安徽医学,2019,40(2):144-147.
[9]
应晓剑,项张懿,沈屹.阿奇霉素联合莫沙必利对糖尿病性胃轻瘫患者胃排空时间及胃肠激素的影响[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(19):39-42.
[10]
所剑,李伟,张洋.全腹腔镜胃癌根治术常见并发症及中转开腹原因[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(9):948-952.
[11]
张景辉,杨盈赤.延迟性术后肠麻痹的发生机制及治疗进展[J].国际外科学杂志,2019,46(11):788-792.
[12]
陶凯雄.腹腔镜胃癌根治术并发症的防治策略[J].临床外科杂志,2019,27(5):363-366.
[13]
Yeo CJ, Barry MK, Sauter PK, et al. Erythromycin Accelerates Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 1993, 218(3): 229-238.
[14]
王宁,陈凛,李明森,等.胃癌患者发生延迟性术后肠麻痹的危险因素分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(5):551-555.
[15]
邱江锋,顾佳毅,王晓松,等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术并发症危险因素分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(4):425-428,431.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[6] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[7] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[8] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[9] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[10] 王帆, 马秋月, 刘小莉. 基于分位数回归模型的切口疝手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[11] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[12] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[13] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[14] 刘代江, 蒋俊艳, 万晓强, 马莎英. 结直肠癌肝转移患者生存状况及预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 284-288.
[15] 杜振双, 胡清福, 林颖艺, 张月霞, 陈美丽, 李祎祺, 王振华. 社区全科医师激励机制的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 876-883.
阅读次数
全文


摘要