切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 492 -494. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.020

所属专题: 文献

论著

三种根治术式治疗进展期胃癌的围术期疗效及安全性比较
王兴国1,(), 杨中民1, 张哲1, 张亮刚1, 尹金祥1   
  1. 1. 719000 榆林市第二医院普通外科 陕西榆林
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-09 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 王兴国

Perioperative efficacy and safety of three radical resections for advanced gastric cancer

Xingguo Wang1,(), Zhongmin Yang1, Zhe Zhang1, Lianggang Zhang1, Jinxiang Yin1   

  1. 1. Department of general surgery, Yulin second hospital, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi
  • Received:2018-08-09 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Xingguo Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xingguo, Email:
引用本文:

王兴国, 杨中民, 张哲, 张亮刚, 尹金祥. 三种根治术式治疗进展期胃癌的围术期疗效及安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 492-494.

Xingguo Wang, Zhongmin Yang, Zhe Zhang, Lianggang Zhang, Jinxiang Yin. Perioperative efficacy and safety of three radical resections for advanced gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 492-494.

目的

比较完全腹腔镜、腹腔镜、开腹三种根治术式治疗进展期胃癌的围术期疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2015年3月120例进展期胃癌患者资料,根据术式不同分为三组,完全腹腔镜组、腹腔镜组和开腹组,每组各40例。采用SPSS20.0软件进行统计学分析,围术期相关指标的描述以(±s)的形式,两组间采用t检验,三组间采用F检验分析;术后并发症、随访1年内的复发率、转移率和病死率采用χ2检验分析。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

三组的淋巴结清扫数和手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);完全腹腔镜组术中出血量、术后镇痛时间和术后住院时间均明显低于开腹组(P<0.05),但与腹腔镜组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而术后下床时间与消化道重建时间则均明显少于开腹组与腹腔镜组(P<0.05);三组患者术后并发症发生率和1年内复发、转移与死亡率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

完全腹腔镜胃癌根治术具有恢复快、创伤小、疼痛感轻、安全可靠等优势,近期疗效较好,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the perioperative efficacy and safety of complete radical laparoscopic, laparoscopic, and open radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

120 cases of advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different operative methods, they were divided into three groups: complete laparoscopic group, laparoscopic group, and open group, with 40 cases in each group. SPSS20.0 software was used to statistically analyze. The perioperative efficacy-related indicators and other measurement data were described in the form of(±s), and compared with t tests between the two groups, and F tests among the three groups. Postoperative complications and recurrence within 1 year after follow-up were performed. Counting data such as metastasis, survival, etc. were analyzed using the χ2 test. When P<0.05, the difference was statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in lymph node dissection and operation time between complete laparoscopic group, laparoscopic group and laparotomy group (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative analgesia time, and postoperative hospital stay in the complete laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the open group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the complete laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic group (P>0.05). The postoperative bedtime and gastrointestinal reconstruction time in the complete laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the open group and laparoscopic group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence, metastasis and death among the three groups within one year (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Complete laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has the advantages of rapid recovery, less trauma, less pain, and safety and reliability. The recent curative effect is better. It is worth further promotion and application.

表1 120例进展期胃癌患者不同术式三组患者的基本临床资料[(±s),例]
表2 120例进展期胃癌患者不同术式三组患者手术指标比较(±s)
表3 120例进展期胃癌患者不同术式三组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 120例进展期胃癌患者不同术式三组患者术后1年的复发、转移与死亡情况比较[例(%)]
[5]
胡建昆,赵林勇.腹腔镜胃癌根治联合脏器切除的现状与发展[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 457-460.
[6]
王进,郭绍春,樊林,等.进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助与开放D2根治术围手术期临床效果比较[J].现代肿瘤医学,2016, 24 (7) : 1080-1082.
[7]
林建贤,黄昌明,郑朝辉,等.腹腔镜与传统开腹远侧胃大部切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的疗效对比研究[J].中华外科杂志,2016,54(10): 755-760.
[8]
李晓峰,杨生虎,韩云.腹腔镜下D2根治术治疗局部进展期远端胃癌30例效果观察[J].山东医药,2016, 56 (13) : 54-56.
[9]
沈乃营,何盟国,王智翔,等.腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术在进展期胃癌中的临床应用价值[J].现代肿瘤医学,2016, 24(23): 3778-3780.
[10]
林琳,许庆文,徐飞鹏,等.腹腔镜与开腹根治性全胃切除术并D2淋巴清扫治疗中上部进展期胃癌安全性的研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2016,33 (11) : 2566-2568.
[11]
胡建昆,赵林勇.腹腔镜胃癌根治术的难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2): 91-94.
[12]
崔军,司磊.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助进展期远端胃癌根治术的近期疗效比较[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017, 20(1): 38-40.
[13]
汪雪,王梦桥,汪树林.腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的临床疗效分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(10): 733-736.
[1]
Zhao EH,Ling TL,Cao H.Current status of surgical treatment of gastric cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery in China: Opportunity and challenge[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 28: 45-50.
[2]
王敏,杨勇,李冲.腹腔镜下远端胃癌切除100例的临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 252-254.
[3]
王建宏,何伟.腹腔镜D2根治全胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌患者的近期疗效[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复,2016, 23(10): 1189-1192.
[4]
Haverkamp L,Ruurda JP,Offerhaus GJ, et a1.Laparoseopie gastrectomy in Western European patients with advanced gastric carIcer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(1): 110-115.
[14]
蔡逊,叶家欣,马丹丹,等.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术近期临床疗效的对比研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016, 23(2): 186-191.
[15]
高野.开腹手术及完全腹腔镜D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近远期疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017, 21(1): 125-126.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[7] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[11] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[12] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[13] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[14] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?