切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 643 -646. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.06.014

论著

不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比
刘海旺1, 施海1, 尚利峰1,()   
  1. 1. 710000 西安,西安大兴医院
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-04 出版日期:2024-12-26
  • 通信作者: 尚利峰

Comparison of different staplers in Roux-en-Y anastomosis during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer

Haiwang Liu1, Hai Shi1, Lifeng Shang1,()   

  1. 1. Xi’an Daxing Hospital, Xi’an Shaanxi Province 710000, China
  • Received:2024-02-04 Published:2024-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Lifeng Shang
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi Province 2023 Science and Technology Plan Project(2023-JC-YB-786)
引用本文:

刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.

Haiwang Liu, Hai Shi, Lifeng Shang. Comparison of different staplers in Roux-en-Y anastomosis during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.

目的

对比不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2020年10月至2023年10月行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合的135例远端胃腺癌患者临床资料。根据术中残胃空肠吻合口重建时应用吻合器不同将患者分为A组(n=66例,圆型吻合器)和B组(n=69例,直线切割闭合器)。采用SPSS 27.0软件处理数据,手术情况、术后恢复情况、营养状况指标等计量资料以()表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后近远期并发症等计数资料行χ2检验或Fisher精确检验。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、病灶距上切缘距离、病灶距下切缘距离、淋巴结清扫总数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组患者术后首次排气时间、首次进食流质饮食时间短于A组(P<0.05);与A组患者相比,B组术后6个月时吻合口狭窄发生率较低(P<0.05),其他近远期并发症发生率两组患者术后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,两组患者血红蛋白、总蛋白及白蛋白水平均低于术前,但B组高于A组(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中,应用圆型吻合器与直线切割闭合器均可行,但与圆型吻合器相比,直线切割闭合器可缩短患者术后排气时间及进流质饮食时间,降低术后远期吻合口狭窄率,改善患者术后远期营养状况。

Objective

To compare the application effect of different staplers in Roux-en-Y anastomosis during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 135 patients with distal gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy Roux-en-Y anastomosis from October 2020 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (n=66 cases, circular stapler) and group B (n=69 cases, linear cutting and closing device) according to the different staplers used during reconstruction of residual gastrojejunal anastomosis. SPSS 27.0 software was used to process the data. The measurement data such as operation, postoperative recovery and nutritional status were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was used. The statistical data of postoperative complications in the near and long term were χ2 test or Fisher exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, distance from lesion to upper incisal margin, distance from lesion to lower incisal margin, and total number of lymph nodes dissection between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of first postoperative exhaust and first intake of liquid diet in group B were shorter than those in group A (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05), but compared with group A, the incidence of anastomotic stenosis in group B was lower at 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). Six months after surgery, the levels of hemoglobin, total albumin and albumin in 2 groups were lower than before surgery, but those in group B were higher than those in group A (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In the Roux-en-Y anastomosis of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer, both circular stapler and linear cutting and closing device are feasible. However, compared with circular stapler, linear cutting and closing device can shorten the postoperative exhaust time and liquid diet time of patients, reduce the postoperative long-term anastomotic stenosis rate, and improve the long-term postoperative nutritional status of patients.

表1 两组患者基线资料比较
表2 两组患者手术情况比较(
表3 两组患者术后恢复情况比较(
表4 两组患者术后远期营养状况比较(g/L,
[1]
吴芳,章笑,钱振渊,等. 经小切口Roux-en-Y吻合在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中的应用研究[J]. 中国医师杂志202325(10): 1453-1457.
[2]
赵艳,陈倩,柴宇霞,等. 腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的临床效果及术后并发症影响因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志202338(05): 799-802.
[3]
陈海飞,钱旭,张易,等. 全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术消化道重建Billroth-Ⅰ式、Billroth-Ⅱ式及Roux-en-Y吻合对比研究[J]. 现代肿瘤医学202028(07): 1152-1156.
[4]
廖国庆,何茂梁,随凯,等. 腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术改良Uncut Roux-en-Y吻合对患者预后的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(04): 411-414.
[5]
梁翙,陈界,王一凡,等. 不同吻合器在胃癌根治术毕Ⅱ式吻合消化道重建中的应用对比研究[J]. 中国医学装备202017(04): 119-122.
[6]
曾珂芮,韩华,卢通,等. 线型吻合器与圆型吻合器在腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术中的应用效果比较[J]. 山东医药202262(02): 78-81.
[7]
中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会. 中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)胃癌诊疗指南2018.V1[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 3-16.
[8]
Apfelbaum JLConnis RT. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Parameter Methodology[J]. Anesthesiology2019130(3): 367-384.
[9]
Schiller JHCleary JJohnson D. Lung cancer: review of the ECOG experience. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group[J]. Oncology199754(5): 353-362.
[10]
Faiz KW. VAS--visual analog scale[J]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen2014134(3): 323.
[11]
Wu ZZhou ZGLi LY,et al. Optimal choice of stapler and digestive tract reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective case-control study[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg202315(7): 1354-1362.
[12]
Milone MElmore UManigrasso M,et al. Circular versus linear stapling oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Surg2022223(5): 884-892.
[13]
赵贵基,陈永强,张振华,等. 直线切割吻合器在腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合术中的应用[J]. 中国内镜杂志202228(09): 41-46.
[14]
庞绍春,吴国忠,姜杰,等. 全腹腔镜直线切割闭合器吻合法在全胃切除术消化道重建中的应用效果[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报201941(01): 52-55.
[15]
Schlottmann FAngeramo CABras Harriott C,et al. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech202232(3): 380-392.
[16]
Slavin MWiesel O. Commentary on: Linear- Versus Circular-Stapled Esophagojejunostomy During Total Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Sozzi et al[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A202333(6): 534-535.
[17]
Murakami KObama KTsunoda S,et al. Linear or circular stapler?A propensity score-matched,multicenter analysis of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Surg Endosc202034(12): 5265-5273.
[18]
张楠,苏向前,徐凯. 直线吻合器与圆形吻合器在毕Ⅱ式吻合术中的应用比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201821(02): 201-205.
[19]
Liu WGuo YQiu Z,et al. A Modified Purse-String Stapling Technique for Intracorporeal Circular Stapled Esophagojejunostomy During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy:Comparison with Extracorporeal Reconstruction Technique[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A202333(11): 1074-1080.
[20]
Romeijn MMvan Hoef SJanssen L,et al. Correction to: Comparison of Linear Versus Circular-Stapled Gastroenterostomy in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study[J]. Obes Surg202131(8): 3588-3589.
[21]
范海亮,王冬,赵群,等. 直线切割吻合器应用于根治性全胃切除术中完成双通道吻合的应用体会[J]. 河北医科大学学报202344(06): 732-736.
[22]
胡鹏,梁文全,郗洪庆,等. 腹腔镜辅助下圆形吻合器与完全腹腔镜下直线切割闭合器行食管空肠吻合的短期疗效和生活质量比较研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202225(02): 157-165.
[23]
任明仕,郭俊唐,刘铄,等. 上消化道重建术后早期三腔营养管空肠营养对自然杀伤细胞表达水平的影响[J]. 现代肿瘤医学202129(20): 3577-3580.
[24]
嵇晋,汪刘华,汤东,等. 早期近端胃癌术后不同消化道重建方式对营养状况及胆囊结石的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(01): 31-34.
[1] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[2] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[3] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[4] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[5] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[6] 张朝军, 袁新普. 腹腔镜辅助低位直肠癌根治术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 602-602.
[7] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[8] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[9] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[10] 姜宁宁, 蔺艳丽, 陈惠明. 胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.
[11] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[12] 周丽, 林巧. 腹腔镜TME与开腹手术治疗原发性直肠癌对患者近远期疗效及生存率的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 544-546.
[13] 李阳, 董峰, 曾立鹏. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后腹腔镜TaTME与TME中的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 547-550.
[14] 兰运升, 赵梓竣. 腹腔镜下高位与低位结扎肠系膜下动脉对低位直肠癌患者的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 551-553.
[15] 李猛, 姜腊, 董磊, 吴情, 贾犇黎. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病及脂肪胰的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 554-557.
阅读次数
全文


摘要