切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 403 -405. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.04.026

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下脾门区淋巴结清扫保脾术治疗胃癌的入路选择及安全性比较
倪殿军1,(), 倪卫娟1, 孙霞1   
  1. 1. 518109 深圳市龙华区人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-26 出版日期:2019-08-26
  • 通信作者: 倪殿军

Comparison of approaches and safety of laparoscopic splenic hilar lymph node dissection for the treatment of gastric cancer

Dianjun Ni1,(), Weijuan Ni1, Xia Sun1   

  1. 1. The People’s Hospital Of Longhua. Shenzhen GuangdongShenzhen 518109
  • Received:2018-08-26 Published:2019-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Dianjun Ni
  • About author:
    Corresponding autho: Ni Dianjun, Email:
引用本文:

倪殿军, 倪卫娟, 孙霞. 腹腔镜下脾门区淋巴结清扫保脾术治疗胃癌的入路选择及安全性比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 403-405.

Dianjun Ni, Weijuan Ni, Xia Sun. Comparison of approaches and safety of laparoscopic splenic hilar lymph node dissection for the treatment of gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 403-405.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下脾门区淋巴结清扫保脾术治疗胃癌的入路选择,并对其安全性进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年1月接受腹腔镜下脾门区淋巴结清扫保脾术治疗的71例胃癌患者的临床资料,根据手术入路不同分为左侧入路组39例,胰后入路组32例。数据处理应用统计学软件SPSS22.0完成。手术相关指标、术后6个月的生活质量评分等数据采用(±s)表示,独立t检验;并发症发生率采用χ2检验;P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

左侧入路组患者手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间均少于胰后入路组(均P<0.05)、淋巴结清扫数目多于胰后入路组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率和6个月的生活质量各维度评分的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

结论

左侧入路清扫淋巴结数目更多,手术时间、术中出血量及术后恢复时间均较短,手术效果更显著,值得推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the approaches of laparoscopic splenic hilar lymph node dissection for the treatment of gastric cancer and to compare their safety.

Methods

The clinical data of 71 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic splenic hilar lymph node dissection in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approach, 39 cases were divided into left side approach group, 32 patients were divided into retrograde pancreatic approach group, the surgical indicators, complications rate, and postoperative quality of life scores were analyzed and compared. Data analysis was performed by statistical software SPSS22.0. Surgery-related indicators and quality of life scores at 6 months after surgery were expressed as (±s), and compared by the independent t test. The complication rate was compared by four-segment χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and anal exhaustion time in the left side approach group were all shorter than those in the retrograde pancreatic approach group (all P<0.05) and lymph node dissection was much more than that in the retrograde pancreatic approach group (P<0.05). The complication rate in the left side approach group was lower than that in the retrograde pancreatic approach group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the scores of quality of life for the 6 months after operation between the two groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

The complication rate and quality of life scores for the treatment of gastric cancer with laparoscopic hilar splenic lymph node dissection in the left approach and the posterior approach are all comparable, but the number of lymph nodes in the left approach is much more, and the operation time and intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative recovery time are shorter, the effect of surgery is better, and it is worthy of popularization and application.

表1 71例胃癌患者手术不同入路两组患者资本资料表比较(例)
表2 71例胃癌患者手术不同入路两组患者手术相关指标的比较(±s)
表3 71例胃癌患者手术不同入路两组患者术后6个月生活质量评分的比较(±s)
[1]
Vega EA, Vinuela E, Cavada G, et al. Lymph Node Status in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Cystic Duct Lymph Node, Lymph Node Dissection and Number of Metastatic Lymph Node[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(5):S1209-S1209.
[2]
沈阳,曾永庆,文刚.保留脾脏的脾门淋巴结清扫在根治性全胃切除术中的临床应用[J].安徽医药,2017, 21(8):1410-1412.
[3]
Chen QY, Huang CM, Lin JX, et al. Laparoscopic Infrapyloric Area Lymph Node Dissection with No. 14v Enlargement for Advanced Lower Gastric Cancer in Middle Colic Vein Approach[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(3):951-951.
[4]
严平雄,王正文,崔海宁,等.3D腹腔镜在提高胃癌根治术成功率及安全性中的作用及对手术相关并发症发生率的影响[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018,12(2):126-129.
[5]
Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. " Pancreas-Compressionless Gastrectomy" :A Novel Laparoscopic Approach for Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(11):3331-3337.
[6]
王维君,那光玮,何科基,等.根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J].临床外科杂志,2016, 24(11):835-838.
[7]
Kobayashi N, Shinohara H, Haruta S, et al. Process of Pancreas Head as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery[J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(9):2194-2201.
[8]
沈韧斌,徐伟.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术对区域淋巴结清扫及并发症的影响比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017,11(6):472-474.
[9]
黄昌明,林建贤.腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫手术入路的合理选择[J].中国肿瘤临床,2017, 44(4):151-154.
[10]
Stepanian S, Patel M, Porter J. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: Evolution of the Technique[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 70(4):661-667.
[11]
李平,黄昌明,林建贤,等.腹腔镜胃中上部癌保脾脾门淋巴结清扫手术时间延长的相关因素分析及其对患者疗效的影响[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016, 15(1):58-63.
[12]
Qin J, Wang P, Jing T, et al.Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for early-stage testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors:A case report and literature review[J].Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(49):e8938-e8938.
[13]
Nicolai N, Cattaneo F, Biasoni D, et al.Laparoscopic Post-chemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph-Node Dissection (L-PC-RPLND) can be a standard option in defined Non-seminomatous Germ-Cell Tumor (NSGCT) patients[J].Journal Endourol, 2016, 30(10):1112-1119.
[14]
高兆亚,雷福明.脾门淋巴结清扫不同方式的手术要点及优缺点[J].国际外科学杂志,2016, 43(1):39-42.
[15]
Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, et al. 560 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer[J]. European Urology, 2016,70(4):553-557.
[16]
张谋成,方雷,张志平,等.脾上优先暴露在腹腔镜胃癌保脾脾门淋巴结清扫的应用[J].外科理论与实践,2016,21(2):150-153.
[17]
Jilg CA, Drendel V, Rischke HC, et al.563 The diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastases in the setting of salvage lymph node dissection[J]. European Urology Supplements, 2016, 15(3):e563-e563.
[18]
刘世呈,吴淼,刘见,等.托出式胰后入路脾门淋巴结清扫在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的临床应用[J].局解手术学杂志,2018,27(4):270-275.
[19]
Abdul-Muhsin HM, L’Esperance JO, Fischer K, et al. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015,112(7):736-740.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[7] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[8] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[9] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[10] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[11] 高静, 严学倩, 及月茹, 郝淼旺, 刘苍春. 胃癌患者以慢性贫血为首发表现的高危因素Logistic分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 534-537.
[12] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[13] 李梅, 孔珊珊. Robocare护理模式联合高频胸壁振荡在腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
阅读次数
全文


摘要