切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 517 -519. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.06.021

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗中上部进展期胃癌的疗效观察
穆同生1,(), 安翎1, 马林1   
  1. 1. 721000 陕西,宝鸡市中医医院外一科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-11 出版日期:2018-12-26
  • 通信作者: 穆同生

Laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy combined with D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of middle and upper advanced gastric cancer

Tongsheng Mu1,(), Ling An1, Lin Ma1   

  1. 1. First Department of General Surgery, Baoji Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoji Shaanxi 721000, China
  • Received:2018-02-11 Published:2018-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Tongsheng Mu
  • About author:
    Mu Tongsheng, Email:
引用本文:

穆同生, 安翎, 马林. 腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗中上部进展期胃癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 517-519.

Tongsheng Mu, Ling An, Lin Ma. Laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy combined with D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of middle and upper advanced gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 517-519.

目的

对比不同术式对中上部进展期胃癌(AGC)的手术效果,探讨腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗中上部AGC的优势。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年1月78例中上部AGC手术患者,依据术式不同分为腹腔镜辅助组(LATG组,n=40)及开腹组(OTG组,n=38),应用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计学分析,术中术后指标及疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)等以均数±标准差的形式表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生率及随访结果采用χ2检验;P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

与OTG组比较,LATG组的术中失血量明显较少,切口长度明显减小,术后首次排气时间、恢复流质进食时间、住院时间和术后1周、1个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)等明显较低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、术后并发症发生率及术后1年总生存率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

LATG联合D2淋巴结清扫术是一种安全的手术方法,在治疗中上部AGC患者上具有术中出血量少、切口短、恢复周期短,疼痛低,不增加并发症,能达到开腹手术相当的淋巴结清扫数,近期效果较为理想,值得在临床中推广。

Objective

To compare the effect of different surgical procedures on advanced gastric carcinoma (AGC) in middle and upper part, to investigate the advantages of laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy combined with D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of upper and middle AGC.

Methods

From January 2012 to January 2017, 78 patients with upper and middle AGC were treated in our hospital retrospectively and divided into the laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy group (LATG group) and open total gastrectomy group (OTG group) according to the different operation methods. All the clinical data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software. Related indexes of intraoperative and postoperative recovery and visual analogue score of pain were expressed in the form of mean±standard deviation. T test was used for comparison between groups. The incidence of postoperative complications and the follow-up results were expressed in the form of chi-square test.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower, the incision length was significantly smaller, and the first time of exhaust after operation was significantly lower in the LATG group than in the OTG group (P<0.05). The postoperative exhaust time, the recovering time of gastrointestinal function, the hospital stay and the visual analogue score of pain in 1 week and 1 month after operation were significantly lower (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in the operative time, the number of lymph node dissection, the incidence of postoperative complications and the overall survival rate in 1 year after operation (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The LATG combined with D2 lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for upper and middle AGC patients. At the same time, with less intraoperative bleeding, smaller incision, quicker recovery, no increase of complications, the number of lymph node dissection can be consistent with the open surgery, the short-term effect is more ideal, which is worth popularization in clinic.

表1 78例进展期胃癌不同手术方法两组临床基线资料比较(±s,例)
表2 78例进展期胃癌不同手术方法两组手术中及术后恢复指标比较(±s)
表3 78例进展期胃癌不同手术方法两组患者术后VAS评分比较(±s)
表4 78例进展期胃癌不同手术方法两组患者并发症及1年生存率(例)
[1]
胡建昆,赵林勇.腹腔镜胃癌根治术的难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2):91-94.
[2]
全祯豪,许庆文,鲁珏,等. 进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助与传统开腹根治性全胃切除术并D2淋巴结清扫的围手术期随机对照临床研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2016, 10(6):14-15.
[3]
Huang CM, Wang Y, Wang JB, et al. Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Upper Gastric Cancer in Patients with High Body Mass Index[J]. Hepato-gastroenterology, 2015, 62(139):742-742.
[4]
所剑. 第5版日本《胃癌治疗指南》更新要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2017, 37(4):402-405.
[5]
Zhang GT, Zhang XD, Xue HZ. Open Versus Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Total Gastric Resection With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Adenocarcinoma: A Case-Control Study[J]. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2017, 27(1):42-42.
[6]
王战红,姚建龙,董山潮,等. 腹腔镜和开腹手术对早期胃癌术后近期生活质量的对比分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(4):321-323.
[7]
Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, et al. A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901)[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2015, 39(11):2734-2741.
[8]
金海敏,黄海,李晓文,等. 中上部进展期胃癌患者的微创手术效果研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2017, 23(6):71-76.
[9]
胡祥.胃癌腹主动脉周围淋巴结廓清的变迁及现状[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(6):451-456.
[10]
Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS, et al. The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2016, 19(1):264-272.
[11]
仝德峰,刘江文,孙琳,等. 进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助D_2根治术的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2015, 24(8):1201-1204.
[12]
杜晓辉,胡时栋.腹腔镜胃癌根治术保脾脾门淋巴结清扫术技巧及意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2):95-98.
[13]
林琳,许庆文,徐飞鹏,等. 腹腔镜与开腹根治性全胃切除术并D2淋巴清扫治疗中上部进展期胃癌安全性的研究[J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2016, 33(11):2566-2568.
[14]
张广坛,张学东,薛焕洲. 进展期胃癌的手助腹腔镜全胃切除及D2淋巴结清扫[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2015, 30(10):762-765.
[15]
杨宏,崔明,邢加迪,等. 腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2016, 15(3):234-240.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[7] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[8] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[13] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[14] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要