切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 130 -132. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.02.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

两种胃切除术式对进展期近端胃癌预后的影响分析
马永恩1,(), 李建平1   
  1. 1. 637400 四川,阆中市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-07 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 马永恩

Prognostic analysis of two types of gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer

Yongen Ma1,(), Jianping Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Langzhong People's Hospital, Langzhong Sichuan 637400, China
  • Received:2017-07-07 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Yongen Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Yongen, Email:
引用本文:

马永恩, 李建平. 两种胃切除术式对进展期近端胃癌预后的影响分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 130-132.

Yongen Ma, Jianping Li. Prognostic analysis of two types of gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 130-132.

目的

比较全胃切除和近端胃切除对进展期近端胃癌预后的影响。

方法

回顾分析2008年1月至2012年3月就诊的172例进展期近端胃癌患者的临床病理资料,按不同的手术方式分为近端胃切除组(83例)和全胃切除组(89例);观察并记录患者手术情况、术后并发症等情况,并对患者出院后生存、肿瘤复发、转移等情况进行为期5年的随访。采用SPSS 24.0统计软件进行数据分析,年龄、手术时间、术中出血量等计量资料采用(±s)表示,比较采用独立t检验;性别、肿瘤部位等无序二分类资料采用卡方检验,肿瘤大小浸润深度等有序二分类资料采用秩和检验;生存分析采用KaplanMeier法,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

全胃切除组患者手术时间、术中出血量较近端胃切除组患者偏高,其余术中及术后情况差异无统计学意义。全胃切除组患者术后胃排空障碍、吻合漏和反流性食管炎的发生率较近端切除组患者显著偏低(P<0.05)。术后1年、3年、5年生存率,近端切除组患者分别为71.1%、45.5%和34.2%明显低于全胃切除组83.1%、67.2%和56.6%;(F=10.746, P=0.001)。

结论

全胃切除能减少对进展期近端胃癌术后并发症的发生率,并延长患者术后生存时间。

Objective

To compare the clinical outcome of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Methods

From January 2008 to March 2012, clinical data of 172 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. According to operation methods, 172 patients were divided into proximal gastrectomy group (83 cases) and total gastrectomy group (89 cases). The operation data and complications of the patients were observed and recorded, and the survival, recurrence and metastasis of the patients were followed up for 5 years. SPSS24.0 statistical software was used for data analysis, Measurement data such as age, time of operation and amount of bleeding during operation were presented as (±s) and were examined by t test. Gender, tumor location and other disorder two classification data were examined by using chi square test, Tumor size, depth of infiltration and other ordered two categorical data were examined by rank sum test; Kaplan-Meier method was used by survival analysis. P<0.05 was thought to be statistically significant.

Results

The operation time and the amount of bleeding of patients underwent total gastrectomy were more than those of patients underwent proximal gastrectomy (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of other intraoperative and postoperative indicators. Compared with proximal gastrectomy, patients received total gastrectomy had significantly lower incidence of complications such as gastric emptying dysfunction, leakage and reflux esophagitis (P<0.05). 1 year , 3 year and 5 year survival in proximal resection group were 71.1%, 45.5% and 34.2%, respectively, which were significantly lower than 83.1%, 67.2% and 56.6% in total gastrectomy group (F=10.746, P=0.001).

Conclusion

Total gastrectomy could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and prolong the postoperative survival.

表1 172例进展期近端胃癌患者不同术式两组患者的一般资料比较(例)
表2 172例进展期近端胃癌患者不同术式两组患者术中及术后情况比较(±s)
表3 172例进展期近端胃癌患者不同术式两组患者的并发症情况比较(例)
图1 172例进展期近端胃癌患者不同术式两组患者术后5年随访及生存情况
[1]
万德森. 临床肿瘤学[M]. 科学出版社,第四版2015,1:213-221.
[2]
许可葵,史百高,廖先珍,等. 湖南省肿瘤登记地区2009~2012年恶性肿瘤发病及死亡资料分析[J]. 中国肿瘤,2016, 25(4):241-250.
[3]
伊丽,马恒敏,李琰琰,等. 2000-2012年肥城市农村居民恶性肿瘤发病趋势分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2015, 22(24):1861-1864.
[4]
Sano T, Aiko T. New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(2):97-100.
[5]
Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2015, 18(2):407-416.
[6]
Jung DH, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer[J]. Journal of Gastric Cancer, 2015, 15(2):77-86.
[7]
Association JGC. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017,20(1):1-19.
[8]
Sugoor P, Shah S, Dusane R, et al. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal third gastric cancer: total gastrectomy is not always necessary[J]. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery, 2016, 401(5):687-697.
[9]
Huh YJ, Lee HJ, Oh SY, et al. Clinical Outcome of Modified Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy Compared to Conventional Proximal Gastrectomy or Total Gastrectomy for Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer with Special References to Postoperative Reflux Esophagitis[J]. Journal of Gastric Cancer, 2015, 15(3):191-200.
[10]
卢昕,孟庆彬,邵永胜. 进展期近端胃癌近端胃与全胃切除的对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2016, 31(2):97-99.
[11]
Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, et al. Feasibility and Nutritional Benefits of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22(Suppl 3):S929-935.
[1] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[4] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[10] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[11] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[12] 高静, 严学倩, 及月茹, 郝淼旺, 刘苍春. 胃癌患者以慢性贫血为首发表现的高危因素Logistic分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 534-537.
[13] 李晓晖, 上官昌盛, 向英, 裴芝皆, 车俊志, 谢飞. 3D腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后机体能量代谢与多囊卵巢综合征患者性激素水平关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 538-541.
[14] 张彬, 贾贵清, 吴东松, 曹绿洲, 张焰凌, 黄灏, 赵高平. 早期胃癌保功能手术治疗13例病例分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 575-579.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要