切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05) : 488 -491. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.05.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良桥式导管内引流在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用研究
李金洁1, 颜迪1, 高德山2,()   
  1. 1457000 河南濮阳,新乡医学院附属濮阳市人民医院
    2457000 河南濮阳,濮阳医学高等专科学校第二附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-27 出版日期:2025-10-26
  • 通信作者: 高德山

Application research of modified bridge-type internal drainage in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Jinjie Li1, Di Yan1, Deshan Gao2,()   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Puyang People’s Hospital, Xinxiang Medical College, Puyang Henan Province 457000, China
    2The Second Affiliated Hospital of Puyang Medical College, Puyang Henan Province 457000, China
  • Received:2024-09-27 Published:2025-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Deshan Gao
  • Supported by:
    Puyang City Science and Technology Plan Project(150625)
引用本文:

李金洁, 颜迪, 高德山. 改良桥式导管内引流在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 488-491.

Jinjie Li, Di Yan, Deshan Gao. Application research of modified bridge-type internal drainage in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 488-491.

目的

探究改良胰管-空肠桥式导管内引流在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用效果。

方法

采取前瞻性研究,纳入2021年1月至2023年5月接受腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)的95例患者,采用随机数字表法分为改良组和对照组。改良组48例应用改良胰管-空肠桥式导管内引流,对照组47例行传统胰管-空肠黏膜吻合(含内引流)。术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间等计量资料用(±s)表示,行独立样本t检验;等级资料或计数资料如术后并发症总发生率、Clavien-Dindo并发症分级以率表示,行秩和检验或χ2检验。以Kaplan-Meier绘制生存分析曲线,Log-Rank检验比较两组间生存差异。

结果

两组患者术中输血量、住院费用相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);改良组与对照组患者累积总生存率相比,差异无统计学意义(100.0% vs. 95.7%,Log-Rank χ2=1.887,P>0.05);与对照组相比,改良组患者术中出血量更少、手术时间、引流管留置时间、吻合时间与住院时间更短,术后第1天引流液淀粉酶水平更低(P<0.05);改良组患者术后并发症总发生率、Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ-Ⅲ并发症分级均低于对照组(4.2% vs. 27.7%,P<0.05)。改良组B/C级CR-POPF发生率为2.1%(1/48),显著低于对照组的17.0%(8/47)(P<0.05)。

结论

在LPD中,改良胰管-空肠桥式导管内引流优化了吻合操作,缩短了手术、吻合与住院时间,减少术中出血,术后并发症发生风险更低,相较于传统胰管-空肠黏膜吻合(含内引流)更安全高效。

Objective

To explore the application effect of modified pancreatic duct-jejunum bridge-type internal drainage in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

Methods

This study adopted a prospective design, enrolling 95 patients who underwent LPD from January 2021 to May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups using a random number table: 48 cases in the modified group received modified pancreatic duct-jejunum bridge-type internal drainage, and 47 cases in the control group underwent traditional pancreatic duct-jejunum mucosa anastomosis (including internal drainage). Measurement data such as intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay were expressed as (±s), and compared between groups using independent sample t tests. Ranked data or enumeration data (e.g., total incidence of postoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo complication grading) were expressed as rates, and compared using the Rank Sum test or χ2 test. Survival analysis curves were drawn by Kaplan-Meier, and survival differences between groups were compared by Log-Rank test.

Results

There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood transfusion volume or hospitalization costs between the two groups (P>0.05). The cumulative overall survival rates showed no significant difference between the modified group and the control group (100.0% vs. 95.7%, Log-Rank χ2=1.887, P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the modified group had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, drainage tube indwelling time, anastomosis time, and hospital stay, as well as lower amylase levels in drainage fluid on the 1st postoperative day (all P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications and Clavien-Dindo gradeⅠ-Ⅲcomplications in the modified group were lower than those in the control group (4.2% vs. 27.7%, P<0.05). The incidence of B/C-grade CR-POPF in the modified group was 2.1% (1/48), significantly lower than 17.0% (8/47) in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In LPD, modified pancreatic duct-jejunum bridge-type internal drainage optimizes anastomosis operations, shortens operation, anastomosis, and hospital stay durations, reduces intraoperative bleeding, and has a lower risk of postoperative complications. It is safer and more efficient than traditional pancreatic duct-jejunum mucosa anastomosis (including internal drainage).

表1 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术两组患者基线资料对比
表2 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术两组患者围手术期指标对比(±s
表3 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术两组患者术后并发症情况对比(例)
图1 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术两组患者Kaplan-Meier累积总生存分析
[1]
Yin T, Qin T, Wei K, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Surg, 2022, 105: 106799.
[2]
Wang R, Jiang P, Chen Q, et al. Pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: 500 patients at a single institution [J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2023, 19(1): 28-34.
[3]
李勇军,杨能红. 三种不同胰肠吻合方法的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术临床对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022, 16(06): 663-666.
[4]
Niu C, Chen Q, Liu S,et al. Clinical validation of the risk scoring systems of postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in Chinese cohorts: A single-center retrospective study[J]. Surgery, 2022, 171(4): 1051-1057.
[5]
Cai H, Lu F, Zhang M, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stent after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. Surg Endosc2022, 36(5): 3629-3636.
[6]
Du Y, Li L, Liu Y,et al. Prevalence of Malnutrition and the Value of Predicting Pancreatic Fistula in Patients with Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2023, 33(10): 937-943.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组,中国医疗保健国际交流促进会胰腺病分会胰腺微创治疗学组,中国研究型医院学会胰腺疾病专业委员会胰腺微创学组,等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除手术专家共识(附:手术流程与主要步骤)[J]. 中华外科杂志2017, 55(05): 335-339.
[8]
杨楠,王庆大,孙楼宗. 胰十二指肠切除术中不同胰肠吻合术对患者围手术期指标和并发症的影响[J]. 陕西医学杂志2023, 52(12): 1723-1726.
[9]
Mostafa A, Habeeb TA, Neri V, et al. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following non-traumatic, pancreatic surgery. Retrospective observational study[J].Ann Ital Chir, 2023, 94: 435-442.
[10]
He YG, Yang XM, Peng XH, et al. Association of a Modified Blumgart Anastomosis With the Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula and Operation Time After Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Cohort Study [J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 931109.
[11]
Ma H, Wang J, Liu L, et al. Clinical application of pancreatic-duct-jejunum end-to-side continuous suture anastomosis in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(7): 5366-5373.
[12]
Chen J, Pham H, Li C, et al. Evolution of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy at Westmead Hospital [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2023, 93(11): 2648-2654.
[13]
Wang H, Zou M, Gao P, et al. Laparoscopic revision of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg2023, 408(1): 80.
[14]
刘月生,李国林,曾海锋,等.不同胰肠吻合法在胰十二指肠切除术中的前瞻性对比研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022, 16(03): 327-330.
[15]
Hong D, Li H, Liu X,et al. Incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after using a defined pancreaticojejunostomy technique for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective multicenter study on 1033 patients [J]. Int J Surg, 2022, 101: 106620.
[16]
Szkopek D, Pierzynowski SG, Pierzynowska K, et al.A review: Pancreatic enzymes in the treatment of chronic pancreatic insufficiency in companion animals[J]. J Vet Intern Med, 2024, 38(4): 2026-2033.
[17]
De Pastena M, Bannone E, Andreotti E,et al.Pancreatic Anastomosis in Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Different Surgical Techniques [J]. Dig Surg, 2023, 40(1-2): 1-8.
[1] 洪菁, 高义, 廖桂兰, 陈晓蔚, 菅志远, 周娟娟, 黄志琼, 韦宇, 邓艳婷. 腹腔镜保留回盲部的右半结肠癌根治术在结肠肝曲和横结肠肿瘤中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 547-550.
[2] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[3] 杨春燕, 周晓苹. 机器人辅助技术在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 584-588.
[4] 张蔚, 李运涛, 尚培中, 贾志芳, 张伟, 郭伟林. 腹腔镜根治术治疗转移性胆囊癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 589-590.
[5] 谢学海, 杨尹默. 我国胰头癌腹腔镜手术的现状、存在问题与展望[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 478-482.
[6] 陈华, 孙备. 我国胰头癌腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 483-486.
[7] 李福荣, 王晔飞, 白治渊, 王海霖, 贺志强, 牛福勇. 两种胰肠吻合方法在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 492-495.
[8] 王小军, 蔡瑜, 安艳新, 刘斌, 冯永安. 完全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 509-512.
[9] 贾宇浩, 吕坤昱, 刘志强, 李保中. 不同入路腹腔镜辅助下根治性远端胃切除术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 513-516.
[10] 菅锎宇, 常如玉, 王达, 顼倩茹, 蒋麟, 贾宝雷, 邱宇轩, 梁峰. 进展期食管胃结合部癌不同手术方式的近期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[11] 孔宪诚, 沙粒, 杜磊, 刘岗. 以卫式线引导的保留邓氏筋膜全直肠系膜切除术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 523-526.
[12] 袁德玺, 徐海霞, 华秀丽, 申青. 适形保肛术对低位直肠癌患者术后肛门功能的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 527-530.
[13] 肖燕玲, 杜升兰, 杨春梅, 许政文, 王玫. 正中切口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术预防性回肠造口中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 539-542.
[14] 吴金柱, 王锐, 朱国栋, 蔡卫华. 吲哚菁绿荧光导航腹腔镜肝右前叶切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 802-802.
[15] 蒋林哲. 腹腔镜胆囊切除+超细胆道镜经胆囊颈管胆道探查术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 803-803.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?