切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 425 -428. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.04.020.

论著

两种改良食管空肠吻合术的腹腔镜全胃切除术中临床对比研究
王浩瑜1, 杨拴元1, 任彦顺1, 阴志强1,()   
  1. 1. 727031 陕西铜川,铜川市人民医院肝胆病院
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-11 出版日期:2025-08-26
  • 通信作者: 阴志强
  • 基金资助:
    铜川市卫生健康委员会科研项目(2023YB27)

Clinical comparative study of two modified esophagojejunostomies in laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Haoyu Wang1, Shuanyuan Yang1, Yanshun Ren1, Zhiqiang Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Hepatobiliary Hospital,Tongchuan People's Hospital,Tongchuan Shaanxi Province 727031,China
  • Received:2024-09-11 Published:2025-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhiqiang Yin
引用本文:

王浩瑜, 杨拴元, 任彦顺, 阴志强. 两种改良食管空肠吻合术的腹腔镜全胃切除术中临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 425-428.

Haoyu Wang, Shuanyuan Yang, Yanshun Ren, Zhiqiang Yin. Clinical comparative study of two modified esophagojejunostomies in laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 425-428.

目的

研究腹腔镜全胃切除术中改良反穿刺与改良overlap两种食管空肠吻合法的应用效果。

方法

前瞻性研究2021年1月至2023年4月82例Siewert Ⅱ型或Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)患者,均接受腹腔镜下全胃切除术(TLTG),随机数字表法分为2组,各41例。Overlap吻合组应用改良食管空肠Overlap吻合,反穿刺吻合组行改良反穿刺法食管空肠吻合。计量资料(如吻合时间、生活质量评分等)以()表示,组间行独立样本t检验。并发症发生率以%表示,组间行χ2检验。

结果

两组手术顺利,无中转开腹病例,均行R0切除。两组术中出血量、淋巴结清扫总数、排气、进食时间以及住院时间对比,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);反穿刺吻合组吻合时间、手术时间、食管切缘与肿瘤上缘距离均较Overlap吻合组更长(P﹤0.05)。两组并发症总发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(9.8%vs.14.6%,P﹥0.05)。术前、术后6个月、术后12个月,两组患者QLQ-C30与QLQ-STOR22评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。

结论

在TLTG治疗Siewert Ⅱ型或Ⅲ型AEG中,改良Overlap吻合法操作简便,有助于缩短手术时间;而改良反穿刺吻合法则能提供更高的食管上切缘,显著降低Siewert Ⅱ型AEG中因食管位置较高导致的上切缘阳性风险。

Objective

To investigate the application effects of two modified esophagojejunostomy methods,namely the modified reverse puncture and the modified overlap,in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on 82 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ or Ⅲadenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG)from January 2021 to April 2023.All patients underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG)and were randomly divided into two groups(41 cases in each group)using the random number table method.The overlap anastomosis group received the modified esophagojejunal overlap anastomosis,while the reverse puncture anastomosis group underwent the modified reverse puncture esophagojejunostomy.Measurement data(such as anastomosis time and quality-of-life scores)were expressed as(),and an independent-samples t test was performed between groups.The incidence of complications was expressed as a percentage,and a chi-square test was performed between groups.

Results

The operations in both groups were successfully completed without any cases converted to open surgery,and all patients received RO resection.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss,total number of lymph node dissections,time to flatus,time to start eating,and length of hospital stay(P﹥0.05).The anastomosis time,operation time,and the distance between the esophageal resection margin and the upper edge of the tumor were all longer in the reverse puncture anastomosis group than in the overlap anastomosis group(P﹤0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups(9.8%vs.14.6%,P﹥0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STOR22 scores between the two groups before surgery,6 months after surgery,and 12 months after surgery(P﹥0.05).

Conclusion

In the treatment of Siewert typeⅡ or Ⅲ AEG with TLTG,the modified overlap anastomosis method is easy to operate and helps to shorten the operation time.In contrast,the modified reverse puncture anastomosis method can provide a higher upper esophageal resection margin,significantly reducing the risk of positive upper resection margins caused by the high position of the esophagus in Siewert type Ⅱ AEG.

表1 腹腔镜全胃切除不同食管空肠吻合术两组患者临床资料比较
表2 腹腔镜全胃切除不同食管空肠吻合术两组患者围手术期指标对比(
表3 腹腔镜全胃切除不同食管空肠吻合术两组患者并发症发生情况对比[例(%)]
表4 腹腔镜全胃切除不同食管空肠吻合术两组患者生活质量评分对比(分,
[1]
邹庆涛,张洪贞,尹作文,等.腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术与近端胃切除术治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌的近期及远期效果对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(04):395-398.
[2]
Jia Q,Ma Z,Wang Y,et al.Integrated single-step terahertz metasensing for simultaneous detection based on exosomal membrane proteins enables pathological typing of gastric cancer[J].Research,2025,8:625.
[3]
Wirsik NM,Schmidt T,Nienhüser H,et al.Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type Ⅱ Tumors:A Multinational,High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis[J].Ann Surg,2023,278(5):683-691.
[4]
Ding B,Yong J,Zhang L,et al.Impact of examined lymph node number on accurate nodal staging and long-term survival of resected Siewert type Ⅱ-Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction:A large population-based study[J].Front Oncol,2022,12:979338.
[5]
戴文鹏,邱卫明,王克强,等.食管胃结合部癌完全腹腔镜全胃切除术不同消化道重建方案对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023,17(03):300-304.
[6]
Ma X,Zhao M,Wang J,et al.Clinical Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Anastomosis for Siewert Type Ⅱ/Ⅲ Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction[J].J Gastric Cancer,2022,22(3):220-234.
[7]
Zheng H,Yin X,Pan T,et al.Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type Ⅱesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].BMC Cancer,2023,23(1):1130.
[8]
Huang Y,Liu G,Zhang Y,et al.Selection of two intrathoracic anastomosis methods for transabdominal radical surgery for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction[J].Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2023,18(2):272-278.
[9]
Wang CJ,Suh YS,Lee HJ,et al.Postoperative quality of life after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients:a prospective longitudinal observation study[J].Ann Surg Treat Res,2022,103(1):19-31.
[10]
Wang WB,Song HN,Huang DD,et al.Impact of Body Composition and Physical Function on Quality of Life After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer[J].Front Surg,2022,8:832351.
[11]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局.胃癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2022,21(09):1137-1164.
[12]
Zhang J,Zhang X,Li S,Liu C,et al.Selection of Digestive Tract Reconstruction After Partial Gastric Sparing Surgery in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction of cT2-T3 Stage[J].Front Surg,2022,9:899836.
[13]
Chen C,Kidane B,Mitsos S,et al.Clinical outcomes of the robot-assisted Ivor Lewis procedure for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with semi-instrument Overlap intrathoracic anastomosis[J].J Thorac Dis,2024,16(1):542-552.
[14]
Xu ZW,Zhao K,Hong QQ,et al.[Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life after undergoing radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for Siewert type Ⅱ andⅢ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction:A propensity score matching analysis][J].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi,2023,26(2):181-190.
[15]
Hosogi H,Sakaguchi M,Yagi D,et al.Side-Overlap esophagogastric tube(SO-EG)reconstruction after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2022,407(2):861-869.
[1] 方伟超, 王晨, 刘馨然, 李宽, 侯浩斌, 陈伟, 李明哲, 何裕隆, 张常华. 通过构建胃癌类器官共培养模型探究嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗与临床病理的关系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 89-95.
[2] 李华志, 孙海涛, 曹广, 张雅静. 基于膜解剖的完整系膜切除+D2根治术在进展期胃癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 262-265.
[3] 汪志翔, 何战洋. 不同淋巴结清扫术在No.16淋巴结局限性转移的局部进展期胃癌中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 266-269.
[4] 申昌军, 刘文奇. 不同食管空肠重建方法在胃癌患者TLTG术食管空肠吻合术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 270-273.
[5] 李鹏, 刘光世, 李涛. 基于黑色素瘤相关抗原A6在胃癌转移与预后的作用机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 282-284.
[6] 李玉庆, 王刚, 李强, 李云川, 杜明新. 不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 286-289.
[7] 艾世超, 孙艺文, 宋鹏, 沈晓菲, 刘颂, 孙锋, 陆晓峰, 王萌, 管文贤. 静脉注射吲哚菁绿导航胃癌根治术的单臂开放前瞻性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 166-169.
[8] 李贞贞, 王宏刚, 崔丽丽, 缪月琴, 刘万璐. 改良管状胃—食管吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃切除消化道重建中的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 176-179.
[9] 邓崇文, 廖喜望, 施幼雄, 龚俊, 钟洪. 腹腔镜下胃癌D2根治+腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 180-183.
[10] 薛林强, 戈军刚, 高林, 钱雷敏, 黄建明. 改良SPLT食管-空肠吻合术在腹腔镜全胃切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 212-215.
[11] 吉林霞, 范小春, 梁琴. 胃癌常见术后并发症类型及危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 220-223.
[12] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[13] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[14] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[15] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
阅读次数
全文


摘要