切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 274 -277. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.012.

论著

腹腔镜近端胃切除不同消化道重建围手术期安全性及抗反流效果研究
马海龙1, 吴少锋1, 王茂1, 陈学锋1, 代引海1,()   
  1. 1. 712000 陕西咸阳,陕西中医药大学第二附院
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-25 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 代引海
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省2022年科技计划项目(2022SF-563)校级课题(2020XK06)

Study on the perioperative safety and anti-reflux effect of different digestive tract reconstructions after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy

Hailong Ma1, Shaofeng Wu1, Mao Wang1, Xuefeng Chen1, Yinhai Dai1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi Province 712000,China
  • Received:2024-04-25 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Yinhai Dai
引用本文:

马海龙, 吴少锋, 王茂, 陈学锋, 代引海. 腹腔镜近端胃切除不同消化道重建围手术期安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 274-277.

Hailong Ma, Shaofeng Wu, Mao Wang, Xuefeng Chen, Yinhai Dai. Study on the perioperative safety and anti-reflux effect of different digestive tract reconstructions after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 274-277.

目的

研究腹腔镜近端胃切除不同消化道重建围手术期安全性及抗反流效果。

方法

回顾性分析2022年12月至2023年12月61例食管胃结合部腺癌手术患者病例资料。根据消化道重建方式不同分为观察组(n=31例)和对照组(n=30例),观察组消化道重建行改良单肌瓣吻合,对照组消化道重建行间置空肠吻合。采用统计学软件SPSS 22.0分析数据。所有数据均进行正态性检验。围手术期指标、食管动态PH监测指标等计量资料用(±s)表示,行独立样本t检验;术后并发症计数资料用[例(%)]表示,用χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

61例患者顺利完成完全近端胃癌切除术,无中转开腹。观察组消化道重建时间少于对照组(P<0.05);术后随访观察组PH<4反流次数、PH<4时间百分比、最长反流时间、反流持续时间>5 min次数、Biox-Ochoa评分均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组较对照组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(3.2% vs.20.0%,P>0.05)。

结论

在近端胃切除术中行改良单肌瓣吻合与间置空肠吻合,总体上安全可行,但改良单肌瓣吻合操作简单,抗反流效果确切,值得临床进一步推广运用。

Objective

To study the perioperative safety and anti-reflux effect of different digestive tract reconstructions after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.

Methods

The case data of 61 patients who underwent surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction from December 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different digestive tract reconstruction methods,they were divided into the observation group (n=31 cases) and the control group (n=30 cases).The observation group underwent modified single muscular flap anastomosis for digestive tract reconstruction,and the control group underwent interposition jejunal anastomosis for digestive tract reconstruction.The statistical software SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data.All data were subjected to a normality test.Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and dynamic esophageal pH monitoring indexes were expressed as (±s),and an independent samples t test was performed.Counting data of postoperative complications were expressed as[cases (%)],and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact probability method was used.A P value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

All 61 patients successfully completed total proximal gastrectomy without conversion to laparotomy.The time for digestive tract reconstruction in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P<0.05).The statistical results of postoperative follow-up showed that the number of refluxes with pH < 4,the percentage of time with pH < 4,the longest reflux time,the number of times with reflux duration > 5 minutes,and the Biox-Ochoa score in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (3.2%vs. 20.0%,P>0.05).

Conclusion

Both modified single muscular flap anastomosis and interposition jejunal anastomosis in proximal gastrectomy are generally safe and feasible.However,the modified single muscular flap anastomosis is simple to operate and has a definite anti-reflux effect,which is worthy of further clinical promotion and application.

表1 两组食管胃结合部腺癌手术患者一般资料比较
表2 两组食管胃结合部腺癌手术患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 两组食管胃结合部腺癌手术患者24h食管动态PH监测指标比较(±s
表4 两组食管胃结合部腺癌手术患者术后并发症指标比较[例(%)]
[1]
Li S,Yuan L,Xu ZY,et al.Integrative proteomic characterization of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J].Nat Commun,2023,14(1): 778.
[2]
邹庆涛,张洪贞,尹作文,等.食管胃结合部腺癌根治术三种消化道重建方式的临床效果评价[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(05): 545-548.
[3]
André T,Tougeron D,Piessen G,et al.Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Adjuvant Nivolumab in Localized Deficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: The GERCOR NEONIPIGA Phase II Study[J].J Clin Oncol,2023,41(2): 255-265.
[4]
葛晗,张殿彩,徐泽宽.第6版日本《胃癌治疗指南》更新要点解读[J].中国实用外科杂志,2022,42(01): 35-40.
[5]
Wu CY,Ye K.Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis: A video vignette[J].Asian J Surg,2023,46(4): 1714-1715.
[6]
中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社.中华医学会胃癌临床诊疗指南(2021版)[J].中华医学杂志,2022,102(16):1169-1189.
[7]
邹庆涛,张洪贞,尹作文,等.腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术与近端胃切除术治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌的近期及远期效果对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(04): 395-398.
[8]
Zhao JJ,Liu FL.Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and lymph node resection in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction[J].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi,2022,25(2):114-119.Chinese.
[9]
Fujii Y,Yasuda T,Inoue T.Laparoscopic Esophagogastric Anastomosis With Stapled Pseudo-Fornix for Reflux Esophagitis Prevention After Proximal Gastrectomy[J].Cureus,2022,14(6):e25561.
[10]
Kano Y,Ohashi M,Nunobe S.Laparoscopic Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Narrative Review[J].Cancers (Basel),2023,15(1): 311.
[11]
Aizawa M,Yabusaki H,Nakada K,et al.Simple modifications of conventional esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy adequately reduces the postoperative reflux esophagitis: a retrospective analysis of posterolateral fundoplication[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2022,407(7): 3153-3160.
[12]
Johari Y,Lim G,Wickremasinghe A,et al.Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Gastro-esophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy[J].Ann Surg,2022,276(5): e407-e416.
[13]
Jung HK,Tae CH,Song KH,et al.Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J].J Neurogastroenterol Motil,2021,27(4): 453-481.
[14]
Ding S,Zheng X,Wang S,et al.Long-term nutritional status after total gastrectomy was comparable to proximal gastrectomy but with much less reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stenosis[J].Front Oncol,2022,12: 973902.
[15]
Gong J,Liu X,Wang G,et al.Uncut interposed jejunum pouch versus esophago-gastrostomy and double anastomoses of jejunum to the esophagus and residual stomach: An innovative method of digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy[J].Asian J Surg,2023,46(10): 4196-4201.
[1] 沈锋, 王葵, 刘建伟. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术治疗现状、问题与发展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 237-240.
[2] 蔡建强, 毕新宇, 徐博文. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术的难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 241-244.
[3] 卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.
[4] 盛海涛, 窦明睿, 王俊杰, 修小龙, 杨建茂, 董长城. 基于CT三维可视化技术的个体化肝分段在解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 258-261.
[5] 汪志翔, 何战洋. 不同淋巴结清扫术在No.16淋巴结局限性转移的局部进展期胃癌中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 266-269.
[6] 申昌军, 刘文奇. 不同食管空肠重建方法在胃癌患者TLTG术食管空肠吻合术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 270-273.
[7] 张小松, 马俊永, 李锡锋, 施乐华, 沈锋. 腹腔镜鞘内解剖性右半肝切除联合区域淋巴结清扫[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 245-245.
[8] 母德安, 张志远, 张伟. 提线木偶单孔腹腔镜下胆囊切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 246-246.
[9] 汪鑫, 向涵, 张伟. T型线联合超微创钳辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 133-133.
[10] 肖建, 肖天保, 陈江, 杨桃, 何峰, 保甜甜, 曹一波, 杨琴, 赵颖. 吲哚菁绿成像技术在保留左结肠动脉的直肠癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-137.
[11] 金芳, 徐东飞, 尚培中, 张伟, 葛艳丽, 李晓英, 苗建军, 郭伟林. 腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术选择性应用超声刀和电钩的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 142-145.
[12] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[13] 张海雄, 吴显博, 罗发. 腹腔镜荧光正染S7段肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 508-508.
[14] . 腹腔镜左半肝切除+胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 509-509.
[15] 曾勇超, 唐荣, 李启进, 张震生. 腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头次全切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 510-510.
阅读次数
全文


摘要