切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 294 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.017.

论著

三种手术策略在结直肠癌并肠梗阻中的临床观察
杜升兰1, 张刘平1, 肖燕玲1,()   
  1. 1. 629000 四川遂宁,遂宁市中心医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-14 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 肖燕玲
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科研课题(H23030)

Clinical observation of three surgical strategies in colorectal cancer with intestinal obstruction

Shenglan Du1, Liuping Zhang1, Yanling Xiao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery,Suining Central Hospital,Suining Sichuan Province 629000,China
  • Received:2024-11-14 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Yanling Xiao
引用本文:

杜升兰, 张刘平, 肖燕玲. 三种手术策略在结直肠癌并肠梗阻中的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 294-297.

Shenglan Du, Liuping Zhang, Yanling Xiao. Clinical observation of three surgical strategies in colorectal cancer with intestinal obstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 294-297.

目的

观察结直肠癌合并肠梗阻患者采用三种手术方式(支架置入+腹腔镜手术、开腹手术+术中肠腔灌洗、支架置入+开腹手术)治疗的临床应用效果,并分析其对患者胃肠功能指标及炎症指标的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2021年6月至2024年6月108例结直肠癌合并肠梗阻患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同将患者分为A组(采用支架置入+腹腔镜手术,n=39例)、B组(采用开腹手术+术中肠腔灌洗,n=34例)和C组(采用支架置入+开腹手术,n=35例)。采用SPSS 22.0软件分析数据,手术指标及炎症指标等计量资料采用单因素方差分析;并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

三组患者手术时间比较无明显差异(P>0.05);三组患者术中出血量及术后排气时间、术后首次下床时间、住院时间存在明显差异(P<0.05),其中B、C组术中出血量高于A组(P<0.05),B、C组术后排气时间、术后首次下床时间、住院时间长于A组(P<0.05);三组患者术后4周糖类抗原125(CA125)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平明显下降(P<0.05),但三组间比较无明显差异(P>0.05);三组患者术后淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、胃动素、血管活性肠肽(VIP)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素6(IL-6)水平存在明显差异(P<0.05),其中B、C组患者LMR、胃动素、VIP低于A组(P<0.05),TNF-α、IL-6水平高于A组(P<0.05);三组患者术后总并发症发生率存在明显差异(P<0.05),其中A组发生率明显低于B组(P<0.05)。

结论

结直肠癌合并肠梗阻患者采用支架置入+腹腔镜手术能减轻患者的炎症反应和对胃肠功能的影响,从而有助于术后恢复。

Objective

To observe the clinical application effect of three surgical methods (stent placement+laparoscopic surgery,laparotomy+intraoperative enteric cavity irrigation,stent placement+laparotomy) on patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) complicated with intestinal obstruction (IO),and to analyze the influence on gastrointestinal function indicators and inflammatory indicators of patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 108 patients with CRC complicated with IO in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed from June 2021 to June 2024,and the patients were divided into group A (stent placement+laparoscopic surgery,n=39 cases),group B (laparotomy+intraoperative stent placement,n=34 cases) and group C (stent placement+laparotomy,n=35 cases) according to different surgical methods.SPSS 22.0 software was used for data analysis.Measurement data such as surgical indicators and inflammatory indicators were analyzed by One-WayANOVA of variance.Enumeration data such as complications were analyzed by χ2 test.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in the operation time among the three groups (P>0.05).There were significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss,postoperative exhaust time,time to first get out of bed after surgery,and length of hospital stay among the three groups(P<0.05).The intraoperative blood loss in Groups B and C was higher than that in Group A (P<0.05),and the postoperative exhaust time,time to first get out of bed after surgery,and length of hospital stay in Groups B and C were longer than those in Group A (P<0.05).The levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the three groups decreased significantly 4 weeks after surgery (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05).There were significant differences in the levels of lymphocyte - to - monocyte ratio (LMR),motilin,vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP),tumor necrosis factor - α (TNF - α),and interleukin - 6 (IL- 6) among the three groups after surgery (P<0.05).The LMR,motilin,and VIP levels in Groups B and C were lower than those in Group A (P<0.05),while the levels of TNF - α and IL - 6 were higher than those in Group A (P<0.05).There was a significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups (P<0.05),and the incidence in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (P<0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with colorectal cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction,treatment with stent placement + laparoscopic surgery can reduce the patients’ inflammatory response and the impact on gastrointestinal function,thus contributing to postoperative recovery.

表1 三组结直肠癌手术患者基线资料比较
表2 三组结直肠癌手术患者手术指标比较(±s
表3 三组结直肠癌手术患者肿瘤因子指标比较(±s
表4 三组结直肠癌手术患者胃肠功能指标比较(g/ml,±s
表5 三组结直肠癌手术患者炎症指标比较(±s
[1]
Sung H,Ferlay J,Siegel RL,et al.Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(3):209-249.
[2]
胡延伟,张红松,范晓彬,等.经自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜微创术治疗乙状结肠癌和高位直肠癌的长期随访比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(02): 230-233.
[3]
Morino M,Arezzo A,Farnesi F,et al.Colonic Stenting in the Emergency Settin[gJ].Medicina (Kaunas),2021,57(4): 328.
[4]
Veld JV,Beek KJ,Consten ECJ,et al.Definition of large bowel obstruction by primary colorectal cancer: A systematic review[J].Colorectal Dis,2021,23(4): 787-804.
[5]
程逸风,张维康.结直肠癌合并急性肠梗阻的治疗策略[J].临床外科杂志,2024,32(05): 457-460.
[6]
姚宏伟,高加勒,张忠涛.不断推动中国腹腔镜直肠癌外科临床诊治规范化[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(01): 1-4.
[7]
Yoo RN,Cho HM,Kye BH.Management of obstructive colon cancer: Current status,obstacles,and future directions[J].World J Gastrointest Oncol,2021,13(12): 1850-1862.
[8]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J].中华外科杂志,2020,58(08): 561-585.
[9]
Schefte XL,Andersen MB,Gögenur I.NSAID and stent placement in acute colorectal cancer[J].Ugeskr Laeger,2023,185(5): V03220229.
[10]
Alsharawneh A,Maddigan J.The oncological emergency of intestinal obstruction: ed recognition and treatment outcomes[J].Semin Oncol Nurs,2021,37(5): 151207.
[11]
Lim T,Tham HY,Yaow CYL,et al.Early surgery after bridgeto-surgery stenting for malignant bowel obstruction is associated with better oncological outcomes[J].Surg Endosc,2021,35(12):7120-7130.
[12]
Girardot-Miglierina A,Kefleyesus A,Clerc D,et al.Obstructed colon cancer: which strategy in 2022?[J].Rev Med Suisse,2022,18(786): 1192-1199.
[13]
郭洋,骆成玉.金属支架联合腹腔镜与急诊开腹手术治疗结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻近期疗效比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(04): 370-373.
[14]
杨修丁,朱跃坤,朴大勋.梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗现状与争议[J].中国肿瘤临床,2022,49(05): 264-267.
[15]
李星,徐勇超,唐礼恭.肠道支架置入在结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻患者中过桥治疗的应用[J].实用医学杂志,2022,38(01):125-128.
[16]
谷军保,杨惠,鲍学斌,等.肠镜下支架置入联合腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌并肠梗阻的临床效果[J].中华医学杂志,2024,104(28): 2637-2641.
[17]
Nocera F,Angehrn F,von Flüe M,et al.Optimising functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2021,406(2): 233-250.
[18]
Leung V,Baldini G,Liberman S,et al.Trajectory of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway[J].Surgery,2022,171(3):607-614.
[19]
Cai W,Li Z,Liu B,et al.A predictive model for colorectal cancer complicated with intestinal obstruction based on specific inflammation score[J].BMC Cancer,2024,24(1): 1035.
[20]
Kittikulsuth W,Nakano D,Kitada K,et al.Vasoactive intestinal peptide blockade suppresses tumor growth by regulating macrophage polarization and function in CT26 tumor-bearing mice[J].Sci Rep,2023,13(1): 927.
[1] 沈锋, 王葵, 刘建伟. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术治疗现状、问题与发展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 237-240.
[2] 蔡建强, 毕新宇, 徐博文. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术的难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 241-244.
[3] 王占奎, 陈治远, 孙闻晖, 杨庆玲, 杨小斌. 术前免疫炎症指数及AFU水平对肝癌患者介入术后早期复发的预测研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 247-250.
[4] 卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.
[5] 盛海涛, 窦明睿, 王俊杰, 修小龙, 杨建茂, 董长城. 基于CT三维可视化技术的个体化肝分段在解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 258-261.
[6] 李华志, 孙海涛, 曹广, 张雅静. 基于膜解剖的完整系膜切除+D2根治术在进展期胃癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 262-265.
[7] 汪志翔, 何战洋. 不同淋巴结清扫术在No.16淋巴结局限性转移的局部进展期胃癌中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 266-269.
[8] 申昌军, 刘文奇. 不同食管空肠重建方法在胃癌患者TLTG术食管空肠吻合术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 270-273.
[9] 马海龙, 吴少锋, 王茂, 陈学锋, 代引海. 腹腔镜近端胃切除不同消化道重建围手术期安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 274-277.
[10] 刘伟博, 李林, 张玉斌. ERAS理念下的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 278-281.
[11] 张小松, 马俊永, 李锡锋, 施乐华, 沈锋. 腹腔镜鞘内解剖性右半肝切除联合区域淋巴结清扫[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 245-245.
[12] 母德安, 张志远, 张伟. 提线木偶单孔腹腔镜下胆囊切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 246-246.
[13] 张海雄, 吴显博, 罗发. 腹腔镜荧光正染S7段肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 508-508.
[14] . 腹腔镜左半肝切除+胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 509-509.
[15] 曾勇超, 唐荣, 李启进, 张震生. 腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头次全切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 510-510.
阅读次数
全文


摘要