切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 544 -546. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.020

论著

腹腔镜TME与开腹手术治疗原发性直肠癌对患者近远期疗效及生存率的影响比较
周丽1, 林巧1,()   
  1. 1. 610014 成都,成都市第三人民医院住院部手术室
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 林巧

Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic TME and open surgery on the short-term and long-term efficacy and survival rate of patients with primary rectal cancer

Li Zhou1, Qiao Lin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Inpatient Operating Room, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu Sichuan Province 610014, China
  • Received:2024-03-05 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Qiao Lin
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project(2021YFS0082)
引用本文:

周丽, 林巧. 腹腔镜TME与开腹手术治疗原发性直肠癌对患者近远期疗效及生存率的影响比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 544-546.

Li Zhou, Qiao Lin. Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic TME and open surgery on the short-term and long-term efficacy and survival rate of patients with primary rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 544-546.

目的

比较全直肠系膜切除术(TME)与开腹手术对原发性直肠癌(RC)患者近远期疗效及生存率的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2016年12月至2018年12月原发性RC患者资料,依据术式不同分为两组,开腹组行开腹手术(n=42例),腔镜组行腹腔镜TME(n=80例)。采用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计学处理数据,围手术期指标以()表示,行独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腔镜组患者手术时间、手术出血量、术后肠胃功能恢复时间和肿瘤下缘与远切缘距离低于开腹组;腔镜组患者并发症总发生率低于开腹组(8.8% vs. 23.8%),肛门功能恢复率高于开腹组(90.0% vs. 76.2%);腔镜组患者3年内生存率(95.0% vs. 83.3%)、5年内生存率(88.8% vs. 73.8%)高于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

TME对于原发性RC患者的近、远期疗效均较开腹手术好,能明显降低手术时间、医源性出血和并发症发生,促进肠胃功能恢复,提高患者远期生存率,值得推荐。

Objective

To compare the effects of total mesorectal resection (TME) and open surgery on the short-term and long-term efficacy and survival rate of patients with primary rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

The data of patients with primary RC from December 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups according to different operation methods: the laparotomy group underwent laparotomy (n=42 cases), and the endoscopic group underwent laparoscopic TME (n=80 cases). SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical data processing. Perioperative indicators were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was performed. Complications were counted by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The time of operation, the amount of blood loss, the time of gastrointestinal function recovery and the distance between the lower tumor margin and the distal resection margin in the endoscopic group were lower than those in the open group. The total complication rate of endoscopic group was lower than that of laparotomy group (8.8% vs. 23.8%), and the recovery rate of anal function was higher than that of laparotomy group (90.0% vs. 76.2%). The 3-year survival rate (95.0% vs. 83.3%) and 5-year survival rate (88.8% vs. 73.8%) in endoscopic group were higher than those in open group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

TME has better near - and long-term efficacy than open surgery in patients with primary RC, which can significantly reduce operation time, iatrogenic bleeding and complications, promote gastrointestinal function recovery and improve long-term survival rate of patients, and is worthy of recommendation.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组患者并发症与肛门功能恢复率比较[例(%)]
图1 两组患者3年内生存率比较 图2 两组患者5年内生存率比较
[1]
中国抗癌协会,中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 中国恶性肿瘤整合诊治指南-直肠癌部分[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志2022,11(02):89-103.
[2]
Safiejko KTarkowski RKoselak M,et al. Robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,731 patients[J]. Cancers2021,14(1):180.
[3]
Ren JLiu SLuo H,et al. Comparison of short-term efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer[J]. Asian J Surg2021,44(1):181-185.
[4]
国家卫生计生委医政医管局,中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2015,18(10):961-973.
[5]
董备,黄文起,林光耀. MRI常规序列结合DWI在诊断直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志2022,20(01):171-172,188.
[6]
Xu QXu YWang J,et al. Distinguishing mesorectal tumor deposits from metastatic lymph nodes by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer[J]. Eur Radiol2023,33(6):4127-4137.
[7]
Caycedo-Marulanda ALee LChadi SA,et al. Association of transanal total mesorectal excision with local recurrence of rectal cancer[J]. JAMA Netw Open2021,4(2):e2036330.
[8]
彭超,陈波,林传彬,等. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗接受术前放化疗的直肠癌患者临床疗效比较[J]. 实用医院临床杂志2021,18(06):153-155.
[9]
Roodbeen SXSpinelli ABemelman WA,et al. Local recurrence after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study[J]. Ann Surg2021,274(2):359-366.
[10]
马翔,刘安文,邱建夫,等. 不同腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022,16(01):48-51.
[11]
姚宏伟,安勇博,王权,等. 腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌近期疗效的前瞻性和多中心病例登记研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2021,20(12):1351-1357.
[12]
Roodbeen SXPenna Mvan Dieren S,et al. Local recurrence and disease-free survival after transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2021,19(11):1232-1240.
[13]
王勇,靖艳,周华强. 双镜联合全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022,16(01):52-55.
[14]
李璇,于和,王煦,等. 4K腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的临床分析[J]. 局解手术学杂志2023,32(11):1013-1016.
[15]
喻晨,王伟,付广,等. 膜解剖完整系膜切除理念在直肠癌根治术中的临床疗效评价[J]. 肿瘤防治研究2023,50(08):777-781.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要