切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 517 -520. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.013

论著

基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析
高金红1, 陈玉梅1, 郭韵1,()   
  1. 1. 210009 南京,江苏省人民医院肝胆中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 郭韵

Application effect analysis of psychological counseling based on King interactive reaching theory in patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatocellular carcinoma resection

Jinhong Gao1, Yumei Chen1, Yun Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Hepatobiliary Center of Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Nanjing Jiangsu province 210009, China
  • Received:2023-10-10 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Yun Guo
  • Supported by:
    Jiangsu Province Youth Medical Key Talents Training Project(QNRC2020833)
引用本文:

高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.

Jinhong Gao, Yumei Chen, Yun Guo. Application effect analysis of psychological counseling based on King interactive reaching theory in patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatocellular carcinoma resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.

目的

探究基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导对腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果。

方法

选择2022年1月至2022年12月102例肝癌患者为研究对象,所有患者均行腹腔镜肝癌切除术,根据护理方法不同随机分成试验组和对照组,每组各51例;对照组行常规护理,试验组行基于King互动达标理论的心理干预。采用SPSS 22.0软件处理数据,心理状态、生活质量、满意度和疾病认知等计量资料以()表示,组间比较采用LSD-t检验,组内不同时间采用配对样本t检验;计数资料采用卡方检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

干预前两组患者的焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、生活质量评定表(SF-36)8个方面得分等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预后两组患者SAS、SDS评分均降低,试验组显著低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后两组患者SF-36量表8个方面得分均增高且试验组显著高于对照组(P<0.05);干预后,试验组患者护理满意度评分和疾病知识问卷得分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者应用基于King互动达标理论的心理干预能有效改善患者心理状态,提升其生活质量、护理满意度及疾病知识。

Objective

To explore the application effect of psychological counseling based on King interactive reaching theory on patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatocellular carcinoma resection.

Methods

A total of 102 patients with liver cancer from January 2022 to December 2022 were selected as the study objects. All patients underwent laparoscopic hepatocellular carcinoma resection and were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to different nursing methods, with 51 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the experimental group received psychological intervention based on King interactive reaching theory. SPSS 22.0 software was used to process the data. Measurement data such as mental state, quality of life, satisfaction and disease cognition were expressed as (). LSD-t test was used for inter-group comparison, and paired sample t test was used at different times within the group. Chi-square test was used for counting data, and P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Before intervention, there were no significant differences in the scores of self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and SF-36 before intervention (P>0.05). After intervention, SAS and SDS scores of both groups were decreased, and the test group was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, SF-36 scores in 8 aspects of both groups were increased, and the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of nursing satisfaction and disease knowledge questionnaire in experimental group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Psychological intervention based on the King interactive reaching theory can effectively improve the psychological state of patients with laparoscopic hepatocellular carcinoma resection, improve their quality of life, nursing satisfaction and disease knowledge.

表1 两组患者基线资料对比
表2 两组患者不同护理方案前后心理状态对比(分,
表3 两组患者不同护理方案前后SF-36得分对比(
表4 两组患者满意度和疾病认知情况对比(分,
[1]
沈锋,邹奇飞,范明明,等. 中国腹腔镜肝癌切除术20年发展、问题与对策[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(04):369-373.
[2]
Yeshong P,Young J C,HoSeong H,et al. Comparison of Open versus Laparoscopic Approaches in Salvage Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation.[J]. Medicina(Kaunas,Lithuania),2023,59(7):1243.
[3]
曹振振,韩会会,杨文义. 肝癌患者血清成纤维细胞生长因子21和富亮氨酸α2糖蛋白1表达情况及临床意义[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2023,52(03):305-308,312.
[4]
王雅倩,徐凯佳. 团队式授权教育联合应用互动达标理论对肺癌手术患者心理状态的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究,2021,18(06):849-851.
[5]
刘培,秦德华,王妍妍. 互动达标理论指导的心理护理在DR围术期中的应用[J]. 临床医学工程,2022,29(12):1693-1694.
[6]
单天昊,安澜,徐梦圆,等. 2020年全球肝癌和胆囊癌发病死亡分析[J]. 肝癌电子杂志,2022,9(04):46-51.
[7]
贾昌俊,戴朝六. 中国腹腔镜肝癌根治术式选择与规范化[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(06):598-601.
[8]
Muppala S. Significance of the Tumor Microenvironment in Liver Cancer Progression[J]. Crit Rev Oncog,2020,25(1):1-9.
[9]
张娇燕,赵亮,隗伟,等. 原发性肝癌患者心理干预研究的文献计量学及可视化分析[J]. 肝癌电子杂志,2022,9(02):41-48.
[10]
刘连新,刘尧. 中国腹腔镜肝癌手术需要规范的几个问题[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(06):594-597.
[11]
Teatini APelanis EAghayan DL,et al. The effect of intraoperative imaging on surgical navigation for laparoscopic liver resection surgery[J].Sci Rep,2019,9(1):18687.
[12]
毛渴欣,胡玉星,梅巳,等. 从情志探讨四逆散对肝癌的治疗[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2023,25(05):1548-1553.
[13]
Liu YP,Pan LL,Kong CC. Stathmin1 promotes the progression of liver cancer through interacting withYAP1[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2020,24(13):7335-7344.
[14]
Rupp Laney A,Zimmerman Marc A,Sly Kathleen W.Community-Engaged Neighborhood Revitalization and Empowerment: Busy Streets Theory in Action[J].American journal of community psychology.2020,65(1/2).90-106.
[15]
许素墩,赵婷鹭,兰恩西. 针对性心理护理结合健康教育在晚期肝癌患者术后康复中的应用效果[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文),2023,9(02):9-12.
[1] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[2] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[3] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[4] 马立伟, 贾志强, 陈午盛, 邵明亮, 刘琼, 段玉松. CalliSpheres载药微球联合碘化油治疗肝癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-372.
[5] 胡宁宁, 赵延荣, 王栋, 王胜亮, 郭源. FMNL3与肝细胞癌肝移植受者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 283-288.
[6] 王飞, 陈政, 余德才, 曹亚娟. 原发性肝癌合并门静脉高压症的微创手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 306-310.
[7] 张敏, 朱建华, 缪雅芳, 郭锦荣. 菝葜皂苷元对肝癌HepG2细胞抑制作用的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 328-335.
[8] 曾聿理, 雷发容, 肖慧, 邱德亮, 谢静, 吴寻. 氯普鲁卡因通过调控circRNA-ZKSCAN1表达抑制肝癌Huh-7细胞体外生长和转移的研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 220-228.
[9] 刘杜先, 张杰东, 付鲁渝, 熊志强, 龚程, 张小雅, 高明悦, 孟俊宏, 刘兰侠. 沉默circXPO1抑制肝癌细胞恶性生物学行为[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 159-166.
[10] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[11] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[12] 鲍乐, 刘颖, 王友彬, 陈龙, 朱玉芝, 梁爽, 权鹤太, 李鹏飞. 还阳通络灸在原发性肝癌介入治疗中的临床应用研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 197-202.
[13] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要