切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 141 -145. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.02.008

论著

胃癌根治手术后行抗菌药物治疗对患者肠道细菌移位及肠黏膜屏障功能的影响
王刚1, 李涛1, 刘玉芳2,()   
  1. 1. 433000 湖北仙桃,仙桃职业学院医学院
    2. 433000 湖北仙桃,仙桃市第一人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-02 出版日期:2024-04-26
  • 通信作者: 刘玉芳

Effect of antibiotic treatment after radical gastrectomy on intestinal bacterial translocation and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with gastric cancer

Gang Wang1, Tao Li1, Yufang Liu2,()   

  1. 1. Xiantao Vocational College Medical College, Xiantao Hubei Province 433000,China
    2. Xiantao First People's Hospital, Xiantao Hubei Province 433000,China
  • Received:2023-02-02 Published:2024-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Yufang Liu
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Hubei Vocational and Technical Education Association(ZJGA202001)
引用本文:

王刚, 李涛, 刘玉芳. 胃癌根治手术后行抗菌药物治疗对患者肠道细菌移位及肠黏膜屏障功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 141-145.

Gang Wang, Tao Li, Yufang Liu. Effect of antibiotic treatment after radical gastrectomy on intestinal bacterial translocation and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 141-145.

目的

研究胃癌根治手术后抗菌药物治疗对患者肠道细菌移位和肠黏膜屏障功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2020年6月至2022年6月100例胃癌根治术患者资料,根据是否使用抗菌药物分为实验组(n=50例,抗菌药物治疗)和自然恢复组(n=50例,无抗菌药物治疗)。采用SPSS22.0统计软件处理数据,肠道菌群数目、肠黏膜通透性指标、应激水平、血浆D-乳酸、二胺氧化酶(DAO)水平、血浆谷氨酰胺(Gln)含量以及胃肠动力相关指标等计量资料采用()表示,采用独立样本t检验;并发症发生情况及血中细菌DNA检测种类数目等计数资料采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者血液中细菌DNA、肠道菌群数目、肠黏膜的通透性、应激水平、血浆D-乳酸、DAO水平、血浆Gln含量以及肠动力间有显著差异(P<0.05)。实验组血液细菌培养阳性数目为0,自然恢复组为14.0%;实验组患者术后肠道菌群数目情况优于自然恢复组(P<0.05),且乳果糖/甘露醇(L/M)值和血浆内毒素(LPS)值显著增加;自然恢复组的白细胞总数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)水平较实验组高(P<0.05)。另外,实验组排气时间、腹泻时间、因腹泻用药次数均少于自然恢复组(P<0.05)。实验组并发症总发生率(10.0%)低于自然恢复组(16.0%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

当肠黏膜受损时,细菌移位会导致肠道感染的发生,而腹部外科手术后早期会引发肠道细菌移位的发生,使用抗菌药物可以减少细菌感染,改善肠道黏膜通透性,促进机体的恢复。

Objective

To study the effects of antibiotic treatment on intestinal bacterial translocation and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 100 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from June 2020 to June 2022. They were divided into an experimental group (50 cases treated with antibiotics) and a natural recovery group (50 cases treated without antibiotics) based on whether antibiotics were used. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used to process the data. Quantitative data such as the number of gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal permeability indicators, stress levels, plasma D-lactate, diamine oxidase (DAO) levels, plasma glutamine (Gln) content, and gastrointestinal motility related indicators were expressed using () and independent sample t tests were used. The occurrence of complications and the number of bacterial DNA testing types in the blood were counted using χ2 analysis showed a statistically significant difference of P<0.05.

Results

There were significant differences between the two groups in blood bacterial DNA, the number of Gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal permeability, stress level, plasma D-lactic acid, DAO level, plasma Gln content and intestinal motility (P<0.05). The positive number of blood bacterial cultures in the test group was 0, while in the natural recovery group was 14.0%; The number of Gut microbiota in the test group was better than that in the natural recovery group (P<0.05), and the Lactulose/Mannitol (L/M) value and plasma endotoxin (LPS) value were significantly increased. the total count of white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Calcitonin (PCT) in the natural recovery group were higher than those in the test group (P<0.05). In addition, the exhaust time, diarrhea time, and medication frequency due to diarrhea in the experimental group were all lower than those in the natural recovery group (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the test group (10.0%) was lower than that in the natural recovery group (16.0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

When the intestinal mucosa is damaged, bacterial translocation can lead to the occurrence of intestinal infection, and early postoperative abdominal surgery can lead to the occurrence of intestinal bacterial translocation. The use of antibiotics can reduce bacterial infection, improve intestinal mucosal permeability, and promote the recovery of the body.

表1 胃癌根治术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者一般资料比较
表2 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者血中细菌DNA检测阳性数目比较[例(%)]
表3 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者肠道菌群数目比较(
表4 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者肠黏膜通透性指标检测比较(
表5 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者应激水平指标检测比较(
表6 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者血浆D-乳酸、DAO水平以及血浆Gln含量检测比较(
表7 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者胃肠动力相关指标比较(
表8 胃癌术后是否使用抗菌药物两组患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[15]
陈亮,马建仓. 腹腔镜全胃切除术两种消化道重建方式对肠道通透性影响研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(03):289-292.
[16]
Sorribas MJakob MOYilmaz B,et al. FXR modulates the gut-vascular barrier by regulating the entry sites for bacterial translocation in experimental cirrhosis[J]. Journal of Hepatology201971(6):1126-1140.
[17]
Lin LNagtegaal JEBuijtels PCAM,et al. Antimicrobial stewardship intervention: optimizing antibiotic treatment in hospitalized patients with reported antibiotic allergy[J]. J Hosp Infect2020104(2):137-143.
[18]
Miao WHan YYang Y,et al. Dynamic Changes in Colonic Structure and Protein Expression Suggest Regulatory Mechanisms of Colonic Barrier Function in Torpor-Arousal Cycles of the Daurian Ground Squirrel[J]. Int J Mol Sci202223(16):9026.
[19]
Gottlieb-Vedi EMattsson FLagergren P,et al. Annual hospital volume of surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in relation to prognosis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol201945(10):1839-1846.
[20]
Jiménez-Lizaola RBFuentes-Orozco CPérez-Navarro JV,et al. Procalcitonina y proteína C reactiva séricas como biomarcadores predictivos de dehiscencia de anastomosis intestinal en cirugía colorrectal[J]. Cir Cir202290(6):775-780.
[21]
杨健康,周茂旭. 二种手术方法对胆囊合并胆总管结石患者凝血功能及应激反应的影响分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(03):322-324.
[1]
陈妍,熊文俊,郑燕生,等. 胸腔内改良Overlap法在腹腔镜SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌手术中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202225(02):173-178.
[2]
马欣俐,王亦璜,顾佳毅,等. 腹腔镜全胃切除术中食管-空肠手工吻合与Roux-en-Y吻合的倾向评分匹配近期疗效分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志202221(05):628-634.
[3]
林曜,沈楚,郭熙恺,等. 腹腔热灌注化疗预防局部进展期胃癌患者根治术切除后腹膜转移的安全性评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,20225(01):48-55.
[4]
张丽柯,杨利平,张剑锋. 通道重建手术对早期胃上部癌患者机体应激反应、术后营养状况及预后的影响[J]. 中国实用医刊,202249(11):22-26.
[5]
Xie SZLiu BYe HY,et al. Dendrobium huoshanense polysaccharide regionally regulates intestinal mucosal barrier function and intestinal microbiota in mice[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers2019206:149-162.
[6]
郑跃杰,段恕诚. 肠道细菌易位[J]. 中国微生态学杂志200214(05):304-305.
[7]
Faas MMde Vos P. Mitochondrial function in immune cells in health and disease[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis20201866(10):165845.
[8]
Shen LZhou YWu X,et al. TREM1 Blockade Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Intestinal Dysfunction through Inhibiting Intestinal Apoptosis and Inflammation Response[J]. Biomed Res Int20212021:6635452.
[9]
汪玲,王桂平.细菌内毒素的检测方法及其应用概况[J].中国药师,2003,6(05):316-317.
[10]
Hou YCWu JMChen KY,et al. Glutamine and leucine administration attenuates muscle atrophy in sepsis[J]. Life Sci2023314:121327.
[11]
丁一芮,梅璐. 发酵乳对脓毒症患者肠黏膜屏障功能的影响[J]. 中国微生态学杂志202234(04):426-429.
[12]
赵国杰,卢悦,崔博,等. 昼夜节律紊乱对大鼠肠道菌群及肠道屏障的影响[J]. 现代预防医学202249(08):1495-1500.
[13]
Hashimoto HSaito MSato J,et al. Indications and classes of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in Japan: A descriptive study using the national database of electronic health insurance claims,2012-2015[J]. Int J Infect Dis202091:1-8.
[14]
Dolk FCKPouwels KBSmith DRM,et al. Antibiotics in primary care in England: which antibiotics are prescribed and for which conditions[J]?J Antimicrob Chemother201873:2-10.
[1] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[13] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[14] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要