切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 299 -302. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.03.018

论著

腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术BillrothⅠ式消化道重建中不同吻合方法的临床对比研究
韩超1,()   
  1. 1. 110001 沈阳,中国医科大学附属第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-21 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 韩超

Clinical comparative study of different anastomosis methods in Billroth gastrointestinal reconstruction in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Chao Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology,First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang Liaoning Province 110001,China
  • Received:2021-02-21 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Chao Han
引用本文:

韩超. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术BillrothⅠ式消化道重建中不同吻合方法的临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 299-302.

Chao Han. Clinical comparative study of different anastomosis methods in Billroth gastrointestinal reconstruction in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 299-302.

目的

探讨腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Billroth式消化道重建中不同吻合方法的临床效果。

方法

前瞻性纳入2017年6月至2019年12月收治的90例行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术并行Billroth式消化道重建患者的临床资料,采用随机数字表法将患者分为A组、B组和C组,每组30例,A组采用三角吻合法,B组采用改良三角吻合法,C组采用Overlap吻合法。采用SPSS 22.0软件处理数据,计量资料以(

xˉ
±s)表示,多组间比较行单因素方差分析,两组间比较行LSD-t检验;等级计数资料行秩和检验,非等级计数资料行χ2检验;生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-Rank检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

三组手术时间及吻合时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中B组、C组的手术时间和吻合时间明显低于A组(P<0.05);三组吻合口相关并发症情况比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中B组吻合口相关并发症的发生率明显低于A组(0.0% vs. 20.0%,P<0.05);通过Kaplan-Meier分析显示,三组患者的总生存率与无病生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Billroth式消化道重建中,改良三角吻合和Overlap吻合不仅缩短了手术时间和吻合时间,也降低了患者术后并发症发生的风险,且不影响预后,更具有优势。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of different anastomosis methods in Billroth digestive tract reconstruction in distal gastrectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of 90 patients with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and Billroth digestive tract reconstruction from June 2017 to December 2019 were prospectively included. The patients were divided into group A,group B and group C by random number table method,with 30 patients in each group. Group A was triangulated,group B was modified triangulated,group C adopts Overlap anastomosis method. SPSS 22.0 software was used to process data,and the measurement data were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),single factor variance analysis was performed among multiple groups,LSD-t test was performed between two groups;Row rank sum test and χ2 test were performed for rank count data and non-rank count data;Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. P<0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.

Results

The operative time and anastomosis time of the three groups were significantly different(P<0.05).The operation time and anastomosis time of group B and group C were significantly lower than those of group A(P<0.05);There were statistically significant differences in anastomose-related complications among the three groups(P<0.05),the incidence of anastomotic complications in group B was significantly lower than that in group A(0.0% vs. 20.0%,P<0.05);Kaplan Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate among the three groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

In laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth Ⅰ digestive tract reconstruction,modified triangular anastomosis and overlap anastomosis not only shorten the operation time and anastomosis time,but also reduce the risk of postoperative complications of patients,without affecting the prognosis,which has more advantages.

表1 90例胃癌Billroth式消化道重建不同吻合方法三组患者一般资料对比[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 90例胃癌Billroth式消化道重建不同吻合方法三组患者围手术期相关指标比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表3 90例胃癌BillrothⅠ式消化道重建中不同吻合方法三组患者术后并发症情况比较(例)
图1 90例胃癌BillrothⅠ式消化道重建不同吻合方法三组患者术后生存情况
[1]
国家卫生健康委员会. 胃癌诊疗规范(2018年版)[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)20199(3):118-144.
[2]
季加孚,王宇宸,肖琪严. 中国胃癌腹腔镜手术临床研究现状[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(2):109-113.
[3]
高波,黄庆兴,董剑宏. 三角吻合技术在全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术消化道重建中的临床研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201720(1):73-78.
[4]
陈宝胜,刘雅刚,张吉水,等. 远端胃癌根治术中两种消化道重建方式的效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(5):491-494.
[5]
左婷婷,郑荣寿,曾红梅,等. 中国胃癌流行病学现状[J]. 中国肿瘤临床201744(1):52-58.
[6]
徐泽宽,王林俊,李博文. 腹腔镜胃癌手术进展及展望[J].中国实用外科杂志202040(2):185-190.
[7]
刘惠滨. 近,远端胃癌差异的研究进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志201919(10):933-936.
[8]
Kitano SIso YMoriyama M,et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc19944(2):146-148.
[9]
张祚聪,崔明福,孙立波. 远端胃癌手术后消化道重建方法的研究进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志201724(6):775-778.
[10]
丁海涛,韩智君,曹杰,等. 胃十二指肠三角吻合术在远端胃癌根治术后消化道重建中的安全性及疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志201721(3):182-186.
[11]
李季,杨韵霏,张军. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中吻合方式和消化道重建的现状[J]. 医学信息202033(8):43-47.
[12]
Kanaya SGomi TMomoi H,et al. Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy:new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg2002195(2):284-287.
[13]
Huang CLin MChen Q,et al. A Modified Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer:A Safe and Feasible Technique[J]. PloS One20149(7):e102736.
[14]
Jang CELee S-II. Modified intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy intotally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer:earlyexperience[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res201589(6):306-312.
[15]
张冠南,陆君阳,徐徕,等. Overlap胃十二指肠吻合在完全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术消化道重建中的初步应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201922(11):1064-1069.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要