切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 150 -153. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.02.010

论著

三种手术方式治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期乳腺癌的疗效及预后比较
韩拓1, 张伟2, 陈亮1, 肖栋1,()   
  1. 1. 723000 陕西汉中,西安交通大学医学院附属三二〇一医院甲状腺乳腺外科
    2. 710061 西安,西安交通大学附属第一医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-11 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 肖栋

Comparison of the curative effect and prognosis of three surgical methods in the treatment of stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ breast cancer

Tuo Han1, Wei Zhang2, Liang Chen1, Dong Xiao1,()   

  1. 1. Depertment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, 3201 Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Hanzhong Shanxi Province 723000, China
    2. Depertmen of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an Shanxi Province 710061, China
  • Received:2021-03-11 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Dong Xiao
  • Supported by:
    Basic research plan of natural science of Shaanxi Province[general project(on the surface)](2020JM-393)
引用本文:

韩拓, 张伟, 陈亮, 肖栋. 三种手术方式治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期乳腺癌的疗效及预后比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 150-153.

Tuo Han, Wei Zhang, Liang Chen, Dong Xiao. Comparison of the curative effect and prognosis of three surgical methods in the treatment of stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 150-153.

目的

比较三种手术方式治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期乳腺癌的疗效及预后。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2018年3月接受手术治疗的127例乳腺癌女性患者病例资料,根据术式的不同分为三组,即腔镜组(40例,行单孔法腔镜保乳术)、传统组(44例,行传统开放保乳术)、根治组(43例,行开放全乳切除术)。采用SPSS 23.0统计分析软件,手术相关指标以(

xˉ
±s)表示,多组间采用单因素方差分析;并发症、局部复发率、转移率等计数资料以率表示,比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

手术时间:传统组<根治组<腔镜组(P<0.05);术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、住院时间、并发症总发生率:腔镜组<传统组<根治组(P<0.05);乳房美观程度优良率:腔镜组>传统组>根治组(P<0.05);三组患者术后3年局部复发率、转移率相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腔镜保乳术、传统开放保乳术、改良根治术治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期乳腺癌的疗效相当,中远期复发、转移风险也无明显差异,但腔镜保乳术在乳房美观、术后恢复方面具有一定优势。

Objective

To compare the efficacy and prognosis of three kinds of operation for stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ breast cancer.

Methods

The data of 127 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment from March 2013 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into three groups according to the operation types:endoscopic group(40 cases underwent single hole endoscopic breast conserving surgery),traditional group(44 cases underwent traditional open breast conserving surgery),and radical resection group(43 cases underwent open total mastectomy). SPSS 23.0 statistical analysis software was used,and the operation-related indicators were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),and single-factor analysis of variance was used among multiple groups;the count data such as complications and metastasis rate were expressed as rates,and χ2 test was used for comparison;P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Operation time:traditional group < radical group < endoscopic group(P < 0.05);Intraoperative bleeding,number of lymph node dissections,length of hospital stay and total incidence of complications:endoscopic group < traditional group < radical group(P < 0.05);The excellent and good rate of breast beauty:endoscopic group > traditional group > radical mastectomy group(P < 0.05);There was no significant difference in local recurrence rate and metastasis rate among the three groups(P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Endoscopic breast-conserving surgery,traditional open breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy have similar efficacy in the treatment of stage Ⅰ to Ⅱ breast cancer,and there is no significant difference in the risk of mid and long term recurrence and metastasis. However,endoscopic breast-conserving surgery has certain advantages in breast aesthetics and postoperative recovery.

表1 127例乳腺癌患者不同术式三组基线资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 127例乳腺癌患者不同术式三组手术相关指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 127例乳腺癌患者不同术式三组乳房美观程度比较[例(%)]
表4 127例乳腺癌患者不同术式三组术后近中期预后比较[例(%)]
[1]
魏刚,王长青,王巍,等. 早期乳腺癌患者行保乳术和改良根治术的近远期治疗效果分析[J/CD]. 实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版)20196(2):116,120.
[2]
Wang W,,Song Y,,Li J. Incidental Radiation to Internal Mammary Nodes Drainage Area in Breast Cancer Treated With Modified Radical Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Surgery[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology,Biology,Physics2020108(3):e331.
[3]
岳雁鸿,王瑶,曾燕. 保乳术、改良根治术和改良根治术联合放疗治疗三阴性乳腺癌术后局部复发情况比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(2):177-179.
[4]
王西山,刘黎明. 比较改良根治术及保乳手术治疗乳腺癌的近远期疗效及保乳效果[J]. 医学理论与实践202033(23):3933-3915.
[5]
沈坤炜. 乳腺癌临床诊断治疗实用手册[M]. 上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2013.
[6]
黎介寿,吴孟超,黄志强. 普通外科手术学[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,2005.
[7]
杨学宁,吴一龙. 实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准-RECIST[J]. 循证医学20044(2):85-90.
[8]
杜彦秋,管霞,常登峰,等. 基于Bevilacqua模型的乳腺癌保乳术患者术后淋巴水肿风险预测的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(1):53-56.
[9]
刘峥,杨基鹏,任思媛,等. 保留乳头的乳腺癌切除术在早期乳腺癌患者中临床效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(3):273-276.
[10]
肖琪,孟垒,何俊峰,等. Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者行保乳术与改良根治术后预后及局部区域复发相关因素的分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志202027(11):1397-1402.
[11]
Moisin A,,Manda G,,Bratu D,et al. Efficiency of modified radical mastectomy in the therapeutic conduct of breast cancer[J]. Romanian Biotechnological Letters202126(1):2331-2339.
[12]
Obadiel YA,,Al-Ba'Adani MN,,Haidar QH. Early Complications Following Modified Radical Mastectomy—Among Breast Cancer Patients Admitted to AL Gomhory Teaching Hospital,Sana'a,Yemen between Jan. 2019-Jan. 2020[J]. Open Access Library Journal20207(12):1-11.
[13]
高红霞,齐书山,黄海荣,等. 单孔法腔镜保乳手术治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复202027(5):586-588.
[14]
Bhargavan R,,Tiwari VK,,Muralee M,et al. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema—a Case of the Left Upper Arm Lymphedema After Modified Radical Mastectomy Presenting with Nonfunctional Limb[J]. Indian J Surg201981(2):186–188.
[15]
李平,李丙立,孙毅,等. 单孔法腔镜保乳术对乳腺癌患者美容效果及生命质量的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践20205(26):12-13.
[16]
Xu A,,Barrio A,,Braunstein LZ,et al. Outcomes of Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Modified Radical Mastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology,Biology,Physics2020108(3):e35.
[17]
王存富,钱鹏飞,黎冠宏,等. 保乳术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌效果观察[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展201922(12):977-978.
[18]
丁锦辉,丁贺义,罗超英,等. 保留乳房手术联合腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)201913(6):356-361.
[1] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[4] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[5] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[7] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要