切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 64 -67. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.01.018.

论著

ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究
高杰红1, 黎平平2, 齐婧3, 代引海1,4,()   
  1. 1.712000 陕西咸阳,陕西中医药大学
    2.712000 陕西咸阳,陕西中医药大学第二临床医学院
    3.712000 陕西咸阳,陕西中医药大学第二附属医院心内科
    4.712000 陕西咸阳,陕西中医药大学第二临床医学院肿瘤乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-01 出版日期:2024-12-25
  • 通信作者: 代引海
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度陕西省科技厅社会发展领域重点研发计划(2022SF-563)2021—2022年度陕西省中医药科研项目(2021-GJ-LC012)

Study on the relationship between the expression of ETFA gene and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in breast cancer

Jiehong Gao1, Pingping Li2, Jing Qi3, Yinhai Dai1,4,()   

  1. 1.Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi Province 712000,China
    2.The Second Clinical Medical College,Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi Province 712000,China
    3.Department of Cardiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi Province 712000,China
    4.Department of Breast Oncology,Second Clinical Medical College,Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi Province 712000,China
  • Received:2024-07-01 Published:2024-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Yinhai Dai
引用本文:

高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.

Jiehong Gao, Pingping Li, Jing Qi, Yinhai Dai. Study on the relationship between the expression of ETFA gene and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.

目的

研究电子转移黄素蛋白A(ETFA)和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系。

方法

回顾性收集2020年12月至2024年2月行手术治疗的女性乳腺癌患者115例为研究对象,术后均随访36个月。采用统计学软件SPSS 22.0分析数据。符合正态分布的计量资料用(x ± s)表示,行独立样本t检验;计数资料用[例(%)]表示采用χ2检验;Spearson分析乳腺癌组织中ETFA和CD34阳性表达与不同病理参数的相关性;采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析乳腺癌患者3年生存率。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

ETFAmRNA和CD34mRNA在乳腺癌组织和癌旁正常组织表达有显著差异(P<0.05);乳腺癌组织中ETFA和CD34阳性表达率分别为73.9%和77.4%,癌旁正常组织中分别为25.2%和9.6%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);乳腺癌组织中ETFA和CD34阳性表达率在肿瘤分期、分化程度、淋巴结转移中差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Spearson相关性分析乳腺癌组织中ETFA和CD34阳性表达与肿瘤分期、淋巴结转移呈正相关,与肿瘤分化程度呈负相关。ETFA阳性乳腺癌患者3年生存率为55.3%,低于ETFA阴性患者的59.0%(P=0.021);CD34阳性乳腺癌患者的3年生存率为51.6%,低于CD34阴性患者的62.7%(P=0.000)。

结论

乳腺癌组织中ETFA mRNA和CD34mRNA呈高表达,与肿瘤恶化发展和患者不良预后密切相关,以期成为评估乳腺癌患者病情严重程度的标志物。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the expression of electron transfer flavin protein A (ETFA) and Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen (CD34) and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 115 female breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from December 2020 to February 2024 were retrospectively collected and followed up for 36 months.Statistical software SPSS 22.0 was used to analyze the data.The measurement data conforming to the normal distribution were represented by (x ± s), and the independent sample t was compared.The counting data were represented by[ cases (%)] and compared by χ2 test.The positive expression of ETFA and CD34 in breast cancer tissues was correlated with different pathological parameters by Spearson analysis.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the 3-year survival rate of breast cancer patients.P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Result

There were significant differences in the expression of ETFA and CD34mRNA in adenocarcinoma tissues and adjacent tissues (P<0.05).The positive expression rates of ETFA and CD34 in breast cancer tissues were 73.9% and 77.4%, respectively, and the expression rates in adjacent tissues were 25.2% and 9.6%, respectively, with statistical significance (P<0.05).The positive expression rates of ETFA and CD34 in breast cancer tissues were significantly different in tumor stage, differentiation degree and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05).Spearson correlation analysis showed that the positive expression of ETFA and CD34 in breast cancer tissues was positively correlated with tumor stage and lymph node metastasis, and negatively correlated with tumor differentiation.The 3-year survival rate of ETFA-positive breast cancer patients was 55.3%, lower than that of ETFA-negative breast cancer patients (59.0%, P=0.021).The 3-year survival rate for patients with CD34-positive breast cancer was 51.6%, compared with 62.7% for patients with CD34-negative breast cancer (P=0.000).

Conclusion

The high expression of ETFA mRNA and CD34mRNA in breast cancer tissues is closely related to the development of tumor deterioration and poor prognosis of patients,with a view to becoming a marker to evaluate the severity of breast cancer patients.

表1 不同临床病理参数乳腺癌组织中ETFA和CD34阳性表达比较[例(%)]
表2 乳腺癌组织中ETFA和CD34阳性表达与不同病理参数的相关性分析
图1 ETFA 和CD34 表达与乳腺癌患者术后3 年生存率关系
[1]
Bodewes FTH, van Asselt AA, Dorrius MD, et al.Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[ J].Breas, 2022, 66: 62-68.
[2]
Katsura C, Ogunmwonyi I, Kankam HK, et al.Breast cancer:presentation, investigation and managemen[tJ].Br J Hosp Med(Lond), 2022, 83(2): 1-7.
[3]
Ben-Dror J, Shalamov M, Sonnenblick A.The History of Early Breast Cancer Treatmen[t J].Genes (Basel), 2022, 13(6): 960.
[4]
Tasnim H, Ding H.Electron transfer activity of the nanodiscbound mitochondrial outer membrane protein mitoNEET[J].Free Radic Biol Med, 2022, 187: 50-58.
[5]
Radu P, Zurzu M, Paic V, et al.CD34-Structure, Functions and Relationship with Cancer Stem Cells[J].Medicina (Kaunas),2023, 59(5): 938.
[6]
国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局.乳腺癌诊疗指南(2022年版[) J].中华肿瘤杂志,2023, 45(10): 803-833.
[7]
吴兴旗,党啟华,徐晶晶,等.全自动免疫组化染色仪比较不同抗原修复液对p53的染色结果[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2024, 40(06): 663-664.
[8]
栗艳松,冯会敏,刘明超,等.STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[9]
赵光楠,王敏,王媛,等.年轻乳腺癌患者保乳术后是否有更高的局部复发率的Meta分析[J].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(02): 166-171.
[10]
Salerno KM, Domenico J, Le NQ, et al.Long-Time Oxygen Localization in Electron Transfer Flavoprotein[J].J Chem Inf Model, 2022, 62(17): 4191-4199.
[11]
Hassanpour M, Salybekov AA, Kobayashi S, et al.CD34 positive cells as endothelial progenitor cells in biology and medicine[J].Front Cell Dev Biol, 2023, 11: 1128134.
[12]
Duan HD, Khan SA, Miller AF.Photogeneration and reactivity of flavin anionic semiquinone in a bifurcating electron transfer flavoprotein[J].Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg, 2021, 1862(7): 148415.
[13]
Zunica ERM, Axelrod CL, Kirwan JP.Phytochemical Targeting of Mitochondria for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention, Therapy, and Sensitization[ J].Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(22): 14152.
[14]
Gong Z, Li Q, Shi J, et al.Lipid-laden lung mesenchymal cells foster breast cancer metastasis via metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells and natural killer cells[J].Cell Metab, 2022, 34(12):1960-1976.e9.
[15]
Perret R, Hostein I.Superficial CD34-Positive Fibroblastic Tumor[J].Surg Pathol Clin, 2024, 17(1): 1-12.
[1] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[9] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[10] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[11] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[12] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[13] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要