切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 525 -527. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.05.016

论著

腹腔镜与开腹手术在T4a期结肠癌治疗中的临床疗效观察
刘壮壮1, 高进1, 朱汉建2, 徐家明2, 汤东3,(), 王道荣3   
  1. 1. 116044 大连医科大学
    2. 225001 扬州大学临床医学院
    3. 225001 江苏扬州,扬州大学附属苏北医院(江苏省苏北人民医院)胃肠外科,扬州大学-扬州市普通外科研究所
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-13 出版日期:2021-10-26
  • 通信作者: 汤东

Observation of the clinical effect after laparoscopic or open surgery in treating T4a colon cancer

Zhuangzhuang Liu1, Jin Gao1, Hanjian Zhu2, Jiaming Xu2, Dong Tang3,(), Daorong Wang3   

  1. 1. Dalian Medical University, Liaoning 1160443, China
    2. Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225001, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Institute of General Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University (Subei People’s Hospital of Jiangsu Province), Jiangsu 225001, China
  • Received:2020-09-13 Published:2021-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Dong Tang
  • Supported by:
    Social Development-Health Care Project of Jiangsu Province(YZ2018087); Social Development-Key Disease Planning And Diagnosis And Treatment Project of Jiangsu Province(BE2015664)
引用本文:

刘壮壮, 高进, 朱汉建, 徐家明, 汤东, 王道荣. 腹腔镜与开腹手术在T4a期结肠癌治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 525-527.

Zhuangzhuang Liu, Jin Gao, Hanjian Zhu, Jiaming Xu, Dong Tang, Daorong Wang. Observation of the clinical effect after laparoscopic or open surgery in treating T4a colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 525-527.

目的

评价腹腔镜与开腹手术在T4a期结肠癌治疗中的临床疗效。

方法

选取2016年4月至2018年10月接受手术治疗的243例T4a期结肠癌患者,分为腔镜组94例和开腹组149例。使用统计软件SPSS23.0进行数据处理,术后30 d内并发症发生率及术后3年疗效比较使用χ2检验;术中术后各项指标以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验,以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

腔镜组术中出血量、切口长度、术后排便时间、引流管拔除时间、进食流质时间、尿管拔除时间、术后住院时间均少于开腹组,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腔镜组的手术时间大于开腹组(P<0.05);淋巴结清扫个数两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后30 d并发症发生率腔镜组(7.4%)低于开腹组(16.8%)(P<0.05);随访时间为6~36个月,平均18.3个月,腔镜组和开腹组局部复发率为(4.3% vs.5.4%),远处转移率为(5.3% vs.4.7%),死亡率为(9.6% vs.10.1%),两组对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于T4a期结肠癌患者而言腔镜手术的短期临床疗效更显著,患者受到的痛苦更少,恢复更快,术后并发症发生率小于开腹术。

Objective

To observe and to compare the safety and effectiveness after laparoscopic and open surgery in treating T4a colon cancer.

Methods

243 patients with colon neoplasms who underwent surgical treatment from April 2016 to October 2018 were enrolled and divided into the laparoscopic group (94 cases) and the laparotomy group (149 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS23.0 software, the comparison of postoperative complications within 30 days and postoperative effect after 3 years were examined by using χ2 test; Intraoperative postoperative indicators were expressed as (±s), and were examined by using independent t test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

In laparoscopic group, the intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, postoperative defecation time, drainage tube removal time, feeding fluid time, urinary catheter removal time, and the time of postoperative hospitalization were less than those in the laparotomy group respectively (P<0.05); the operative time of the laparoscopic group was more than that of the laparotomy group (P<0.05), however with no difference of the harvested lymph nodes (P>0.05); the complication rate of the 30-day in postoperative laparoscopic group (7.4%) was lower than 16.8% in the laparotomy group (P<0.05). Follow-up time ranged from 6 to 36 months, with an average of 18.3 months. There were no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of local recurrence of 4.3% and 5.4%), distant metastasis, of 5.3% and 4.7% and mortality of 9.6% and 10.1% respectively (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The short-term clinical outcome of patients with T4a colon cancers is much more better after laparoscopic surgery, wtih less pain, faster recovery and less postoperative complication, compared with laparotomy surgery.

表1 243例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者一般基线资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 243例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 243例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后恢复情况比较[(±s), d]
表4 243例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后30 d内并发症发生率比较(例)
表5 243例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后3年两组疗效比较[例(%)]
[1]
Siegel RL, MillerI KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019[J]. CA Cancer J Clin201969(1):1-28.
[2]
Feng R-M, Zong Y-N, Cao S-M, et al. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics?[J]. Cancer Commun(Lond)201939(1): 22.
[3]
陈柏羽. 腹腔镜下完整肠系膜切除术与传统结肠癌根治术治疗中青年及老年Ⅲ期结肠癌的效果比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 68-70.
[4]
Wang H, Chen X, Liu H, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy as an Oncologically safe alternative for patients with stage T4 Colon Cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study[J]. BMC Cancer201818(1):370.
[5]
杨晓泉,钟敏儿,吴斌. 腹腔镜手术治疗T4期结肠癌进展[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志20187(6):576-578.
[6]
Lu J, Dong B, Yang Z, et al.Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery for T4 Colon Cancer Compared with Open Surgery: A Single Center’s Experience[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201929(3):333-339.
[7]
曹肃,王国纪,武军. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌临床对比研究[J]. 基层医学论坛201923(7): 962-963.
[8]
张仕林,韦国祥,彭厚坤. 腹腔镜根治术与传统开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的近期疗效及远期生存的比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志201928(7):897-902.
[9]
孙百顺,张骏,康健. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的近期临床效果及术后并发症探[J].中国临床医生杂志201947(6):684-685.
[10]
Marmol I, Sanchez-de-Diego C, Dieste AP, et al. Colorectal Carcinoma: A General Overview and Future Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci201718(1):197.
[11]
Kim RH, Kavanaugh MM, Caldito GC. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival[J]. Surgery2017161(6):1633-1641.
[12]
Chen K, Cao G, Chen B, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Classic Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies in the Last 5 Years[J]. Int J Surg201739:1-10.
[13]
杨晓泉,孙曦羽,钟敏儿,等. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T4a期结肠癌的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志201926(9):1051-1055.
[14]
Yamanashi T, Nakamura T, Sato T, et al.Laparoscopic Surgery for Locally Advanced T4 Colon Cancer: The Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors[J]. Surg Today201848(5):534-544.
[15]
Klaver CEL, Kappen TM, Borstlap WAA, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Surg Endosc201731(12):4902-4912.
[16]
彭旗,谢梦达,杨向东. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌患者近期临床疗效观察[J]. 临床军医杂志201947(6):647-649.
[17]
Chan DK, Tan KK. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered in T4 colon cancer[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis201732(4):517-520.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 李怡泉, 谢宇斌, 胡宏, 张燕茹, 陈图锋. 基于生物信息学分析HDAC8在结肠癌中的临床意义及其与免疫浸润的关系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 275-281.
[3] 崔宏帅, 冯丽明, 东维玲, 韩博. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术+IGLN清扫术治疗局部进展期结肠肝曲癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[4] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[5] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[6] 李晓鸥, 杨鹤鸣, 王国栋, 林海冠, 杨建武. 不同入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 377-380.
[7] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[8] 孙龙凤, 侯高峰, 王幼黎, 刘磊. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中SMA或SMV入路的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 438-441.
[9] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[10] 关国欣, 罗福文. 结肠癌合并急性梗阻的个性化处理[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 459-463.
[11] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[12] 朱军, 宋家伟, 乔一桓, 郭雅婕, 刘帅, 姜玉, 李纪鹏. M2型巨噬细胞特征基因与结肠癌免疫微环境研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 303-311.
[13] 靳英, 付小霞, 陈美茹, 袁璐, 郝力瑶. CD147调控MAPK信号通路对结肠癌细胞增殖和凋亡的影响及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 474-480.
[14] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[15] 傅新露, 李之岳, 卢丹. 妊娠合并结肠癌穿孔致脓毒症休克一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 227-231.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?