切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 542 -545. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.05.019

论著

胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响
汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞()   
  1. 638000 四川广安,四川大学华西广安医院甲状腺乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-27 出版日期:2023-10-26
  • 通信作者: 任章霞

Effect of endoscopic unilateral thyroid lobectomy via thoracic breast approach and open surgery on postoperative recovery in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer

Yi Wang, Sizhe Xu, Zhangxia Ren()   

  1. Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, West China Guang’an Hospital, Sichuan University, Guang’ an Sichuan Province 638000, China
  • Received:2023-07-27 Published:2023-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhangxia Ren
  • Supported by:
    Medical Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Provincial Health Commission in 2021(21PJ191)
引用本文:

汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.

Yi Wang, Sizhe Xu, Zhangxia Ren. Effect of endoscopic unilateral thyroid lobectomy via thoracic breast approach and open surgery on postoperative recovery in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.

目的

对比胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者术后恢复的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2019年5月至2021年5月105例DTC患者资料,按照手术方式不同分为腔镜组(行胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术,n=48)和开放组(行开放单侧甲状腺叶切除术,n=57)。采用SPSS 24.0软件进行数据分析,围手术期各项指标、疼痛相关指标、甲状腺功能指标、切口恢复指标等计量资料以(

x¯
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;并发症及预后等计数资料采用χ2检验。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腔镜组患者术中出血量、术后总引流量和住院时间显著低于开放组(P<0.05),手术时间显著高于开放组(P<0.05);腔镜组患者术后12 h和24 h疼痛评分(VAS)显著低于开放组(P<0.05),腔镜组患者术后24 h皮质醇(Cor)水平低于开放组(P<0.05);两组患者并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,两组患者血钙、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)和甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TgAb)水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腔镜组患者温哥华瘢痕评估量表(VSS)和瘢痕评价量表(PSAS)评分均显著低于开放组(P<0.05);两组患者2年无进展生存率和总生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术应激损伤小,有利于患者术后恢复,且美容效果好,在条件允许的情况下,可用于DTC治疗。

Objective

To compare the effects of endoscopic unilateral lobectomy and open surgery on the postoperative recovery of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer(DTC).

Methods

Data of 105 DTC patients from May 2019 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into endoscopic group(thoracic and breast approach endoscopic unilateral lobectomy,n=48)and open group(open surgery,n=57)according to different surgical methods. SPSS 24.0 software was used for data analysis. Perioperative indicators,pain related indicators,thyroid function indicators,incision recovery indicators and other measurement data were expressed as(

x¯
±s),and independent sample t test was used. The complications and prognosis were measured by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss,total postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay of patients in endoscopic group were significantly less or shorter than those in open group(P<0.05),and the surgical time was significantly longer than that in open group(P<0.05). Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores of patients at 12 h and 24 h after surgery in endoscopic group were significantly lower than those in open group(P<0.05). The cortisol(Cor)level of patients at 24 h after surgery in endoscopic group was lower than that in open group(P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the complications between the two groups of patients(P>0.05). At 6 months after surgery,there were no statistical differences in the levels of blood calcium,parathyroid hormone(PTH)and thyroglobulin antibody(TgAb)between the two groups(P>0.05). Vancouver Scar Scale(VSS)score and Patient Scar Assessment Scale(PSAS)score were significantly lower in endoscopic group than those in open group(P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in 2-year progression-free survival,progression-free survival and overall survival rate between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

Endoscopic unilateral thyroid lobectomy via thoracic breast approach has small surgical stress injury and is conducive to postoperative recovery and has good postoperative cosmetic effect. Therefore,if conditions permit,thoracic breast approach can be used for DTC treatment.

表1 105例DTC不同手术方式两组患者一般临床资料比较[(
x¯
±s),例]
表2 105例DTC不同手术方式两组患者围手术期各项指标比较(
x¯
±s)
表3 105例DTC不同手术方法两组患者VAS评分和Cor水平比较(
x¯
±s)
表4 105例DTC不同手术方式两组患者甲状腺功能比较(
x¯
±s)
表5 105例DTC不同手术方式两组患者切口恢复情况比较[(
x¯
±s),分]
图1 105例DTC不同手术方式两组患者无进展生存期和总生存期
[1]
Schlumberger MLeboulleux S. Current practice in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol202117(3):176-188.
[2]
曹一鸣,庄亚强,黄佳鹏,等. 腔镜手术与开放手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌效果的对比分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志202136(06):421-425.
[3]
梁明,张亦磊,王志杰,等. 胸乳入路腔镜手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床研究[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志202216(01):75-79.
[4]
田文,姚京,郗洪庆,等. 中国腔镜甲状腺手术20年回顾与展望[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),202115(06):598-602.
[5]
陈大六,宋勇,赵海剑,等. 三种不同手术入路的腔镜甲状腺癌根治术临床效果评价[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),202317(02):188-191.
[6]
中国临床肿瘤学会甲状腺癌专业委员会,中国研究型医院学会分子诊断专业委员会甲状腺癌学组,医促会甲状腺疾病专业委员会核医学组,等. 分化型甲状腺癌术后131I治疗前评估专家共识[J]. 中国癌症杂志201929(10):832-840.
[7]
Sung YTWu JS. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating,Ranking and Paired-Comparison(VAS-RRP):A new technique for psychological measurement[J]. Behav Res Methods201850(4):1694-1715.
[8]
Ibrahimpasic TGhossein RShah JP,et al. Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma of the Thyroid Gland:Current Status and Future Prospects[J]. Thyroid201929(3):311-321.
[9]
Qu RLi JYang J,et al. Treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer:can endoscopic thyroidectomy via a chest-breast approach achieve similar therapeutic effects as open surgery?[J]. Surg Endosc201832(12):4749-4756.
[10]
俞黎,胡原,包皙婷,等. 全乳晕径路内镜术式与开放甲状腺手术术后综合征比较的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志202115(04):382-386.
[11]
He LQing FLi M,et al. Effects of laparoscopic and traditional open surgery on the levels of IL-6,TNF-α,and Gal-3 in patients with thyroid cancer[J]. Gland Surg202110(3):1085-1092.
[12]
戴萦企,张金庆. 经全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术对良性甲状腺病变患者应激相关激素水平的影响[J]. 河北医学202026(09):1464-1469.
[1] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[2] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[3] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[4] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[5] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[6] 樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.
[7] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[10] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[11] 徐成, 王璐璐, 王少华. 洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌转移淋巴结中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 701-704.
[12] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[13] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[14] 黄崇植, 肖映胜, 杨熙鸿, 林炘. 甲状腺下动脉的上行分支在甲状腺术中定位喉返神经的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 607-610.
[15] 袁育韬, 邢金琳, 谢克飞, 殷凯. CT征象及BRAFV600E基因突变与甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-614.
阅读次数
全文


摘要