切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 513 -516. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.05.013

论著

腹腔镜胃节段切除术中保留迷走神经的临床研究
赵媛1, 赵川妮1, 李爱霞1,()   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛,青岛市市立医院普外科(山东大学附属青岛市市立医院普外科)
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-28 出版日期:2021-10-26
  • 通信作者: 李爱霞

Clinical observation of vagus nerve preservation in laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy

Yuan Zhao1, Chuanni Zhao1, Aixia Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Shandong University, Shandong 266000, China
  • Received:2021-01-28 Published:2021-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Aixia Li
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81673863)
引用本文:

赵媛, 赵川妮, 李爱霞. 腹腔镜胃节段切除术中保留迷走神经的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 513-516.

Yuan Zhao, Chuanni Zhao, Aixia Li. Clinical observation of vagus nerve preservation in laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 513-516.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胃节段切除术中保留迷走神经对早期胃癌手术的临床疗效及术后质量的影响。

方法

前瞻性分析2016年1月至2020年1月60例不同术式治疗的早期胃癌患者资料,按照随机数表法分为SG组30例(行腹腔镜保留迷走神经的胃节段切除术)和DG组30例(行腹腔镜胃部分切除术)。采用SPSS 20.0统计软件处理数据,围术期相关指标、胃排空功能、胆囊收缩功能及生活质量评分采用(±s)表示,两组比较采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生情况采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。随访评价两组患者术后肿瘤复发转移及生存情况。

结果

SG组手术时间显著长于DG组,肛门首次排气时间显著短于DG组(P<0.05);口服乙酰氨基酚后15、30、60 min SG组胃排空时间明显少于DG组(P<0.05),口服乙酰氨基酚后60 min SG组胆囊收缩功能优于DG组(P<0.05); SG组术后1年发生胃食管反流、倾倒综合征显著低于DG组,(P<0.05);两组术后生活质量评分逐渐上升,且SG组术后3、6、12个月的生活质量评分均高于DG组(P<0.05);随访期为12~60个月,SG组复发转移率6.7%(2/30)与DG组复发转移率10.0%(3/30)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者随访期间均未出现死亡病例。

结论

对早期胃癌行胃节段切除术中保留迷走神经安全可行,可获得良好的临床疗效,患者术后胃功能恢复快,并显著改善患者的生活质量。

Objective

To investigate the clinical outcome of preservation of the vagus nerve in laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 60 patients with early gastric cancer treated with different surgical methods from January 2016 to January 2020 were analyzed prospectively. According to the random number table, they were divided into the laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy with vagus nerve preservation group (SG group, 30 cases) and the laparoscopic partial gastrectomy group (DG group, 30 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 20.0 software. Perioperative related indexes such as gastric emptying function, gallbladder systolic function and quality of life were expressed as (±s) and were examined by using independent t test. The incidence of postoperative complications were analyzed by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference. Follow-up were conducted to evaluate the postoperative tumor recurrence, metastasis and survival in both two groups.

Results

The operation time of SG group was significantly longer than that of DG group, and the first anal exhaust time was significantly shorter than that of DG group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The gastric empty time of SG group was significantly shorter than those of DG group at 15, 30 and 60min after oral acetaminophen respectively (P<0.05), and the gallbladder systolic function of SG group was better than those of DG group 60min after oral acetaminophen (P<0.05). The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and dumping syndrome 1 year after operation in SG group was significantly lower than that in DG group , with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The postoperative quality of life in both groups increased gradually, while the postoperative quality of life of the SG group was higher than those of the DG group at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance between two groups in terms of recurrence and metastasis rate of 6.7% (2/30) VS. 10.0% (3/30) during the follow-up (P>0.05). There was no death in both groups during the follow-up.

Conclusion

It is safe and feasible to preserve the vagus nerve during segmental gastric resection for early gastric cancer, which could achieve good clinical outcome. The patient’s gastric function recovers quickly and the quality of life after surgery improves significantly.

表1 60例早期胃癌患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 60例早期胃癌患者不同术式两组患者手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 60例早期胃癌患者不同术式两组患者胃功能恢复比较(±s)
表4 60例早期胃癌患者不同术式两组患者术后1年并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表5 60例早期胃癌患者不同术式两组术后生活质量评分比较[(±s),分]
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians202070(1):7-30.
[2]
朱思莹,冀明. 早期胃癌的规范化诊断和治疗[J]. 中华内科杂志202059(3):236-239.
[3]
徐徕,牛备战,孙曦羽,等. 腹腔镜下早期胃癌节段切除术疗效分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201720(02):213-217.
[4]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4)[J]. Gastric Cancer201720(1):1-19.
[5]
张驰,胡祥. 从日本胃癌研究看早期胃癌保留功能胃切除术[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201821(2):148-153.
[6]
Eom BW, Park B, Yoon HM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: A retrospective study of long-term functional outcomes and quality of life[J]. World J Gastroenterol201925(36):5494-5504.
[7]
徐佳,顾佳毅,赵刚. 保留功能的胃切除手术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201711(6):466.
[8]
Ohwada S, Nakamura S, Ogawa T, et al. Segmental gastrectomy for early cancer in the mid-stomach[J]. Hepatogastroenterology199946(26):1229-1233.
[9]
曹娜,程子娟,李肇蕤,等. 离断大鼠迷走神经肝支对血糖血脂水平的影响及其与mTOR表达水平的关系[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志202038(6):661-667.
[10]
储云绵,邱国同,杜永星,等. 73例胰腺节段切除术的学习曲线分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志202042(12):1020-1024.
[11]
孙伟峰,梁品. 迷走神经腹腔支在功能保留性胃切除术中的意义[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202023(10):935-938.
[12]
Wang C-J, Kong S-H, Park J-H, et al. Preservation of hepatic branch of the vagus nerve reduces the risk of gallstone formation after gastrectomy[J]. Gastric Cancer202024(1):232-244.
[13]
廖新华,车向明,贾宗良,等. 腹腔镜下迷走神经肝支保护降低远端胃癌根治术后胆囊结石发生率的临床疗效观察[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志201823(10):770-773.
[14]
麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明,阿力木江·麦斯依提,陈建德. 迷走神经完整性对抗反流手术的影响[J/CD]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志20196(4):216-218.
[15]
芦照青,王国兴,李春盛. 迷走神经在急性胆管炎致脓毒症中的作用及其可能机制[J].中国医师杂志202022(1):20-25.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要