切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

基于三维重建的腹腔镜下胃癌根治术临床效果
董金付1, 陈剑锋1,(), 孙春荣1, 陈一峰1, 杨国荣1, 曹冀为1, 汪庭军1, 陆文1, 周宇1   
  1. 1. 215000 南京医科大学附属苏州医院普外科(苏州市立医院普外科)
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-20 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 陈剑锋

To explore the clinical effect of Three-Dimensional reconstruction model in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Jinfu Dong1, Jianfeng Chen1,(), Chunrong Sun1, Yifeng Chen1, Guorong Yang1, Jiwei Cao1, Tingjun Wang1, Wen Lu1, Yu Zhou1   

  1. 1. General Surgery, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (General Surgery, Suzhou Municipal Hospital) 215000, China
  • Received:2020-04-20 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianfeng Chen
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81831712); Jiangsu Science and Technology Department Research and Development Project(2018 JS3-12)
引用本文:

董金付, 陈剑锋, 孙春荣, 陈一峰, 杨国荣, 曹冀为, 汪庭军, 陆文, 周宇. 基于三维重建的腹腔镜下胃癌根治术临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 154-156.

Jinfu Dong, Jianfeng Chen, Chunrong Sun, Yifeng Chen, Guorong Yang, Jiwei Cao, Tingjun Wang, Wen Lu, Yu Zhou. To explore the clinical effect of Three-Dimensional reconstruction model in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 154-156.

目的

探讨三维重建模型在腹腔镜下胃癌根治术(LAG)中的临床效果。

方法

采用随机数字表法将2018年6月至2019年12月间行LAG的84例胃癌患者分为三维组(n=42)和CT组(n=42)。CT组使用CT图像进行术前规划和术中应用,三维组依据CT数据采用Mimics 17.0软件进行患者三维腹腔血管重建,利用三维模型进行术前规划和术中应用。采用SPSS18.0软件进行统计学分析。围术期相关指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验分析;以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

与CT组相比,三维组可明显缩短腹腔镜下胃癌根治术的手术时间、平均住院时间,减少术中出血量及术中输血,增加术中清除淋巴结个数,差异均具统计学意义(P<0.05)。而两组术后首次排气时间、术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

三维腹腔血管重建技术应用于LAG术中准确评估患者腹腔血管的分型及变异情况,在术中提供重要决策作用,具有明显优势,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of three-dimensional reconstruction model in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Methods

84 cases of gastric cancer with LAG from June 2018 to June 2019 treated in our hospital were divided into 3D group (n=42) and CT group (n=42) by adopting the method of random number table. The CT group used CT images for preoperative planning and intraoperative application. Adopting MICs 17.0 software to reconstruct three-dimensional celiac blood vessels according to CT data, the 3D group used three-dimensional models for preoperative planning and intraoperative application. SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The measurement data, such as relevant indicators in perioperative period, were expressed as (±s) and analyzed by independent sample t test. The enumeration data such as postoperative complications were expressed as % and analyzed by χ2 test. Indicating difference by P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with the CT group, the 3D group can apparently shorten the operation time and average hospitalization time of laparoscopic gastrectomy, reducing the amount of intraoperative bleeding and intraoperative blood transfusion, and increasing the number of lymph nodes removed during the operation. The above differences are statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the differences between the two groups in first postoperative exhaust time and the incidence of postoperative complications are of no statistical significance (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Three dimensional reconstruction of celiac blood vessels applying to laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can accurately evaluate the classification and variation of patients' celiac blood vessels , which can provide important decision-making role during the operation. It has obvious advantages and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 84例胃癌患者行LAG术不同术前规划两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 Michele腹腔动脉分型
表3 84例胃癌患者行LAG术不同术前规划两组患者围术期相关指标比较(±s)
表4 84例胃癌患者行LAG术不同术前规划两组患者术后相关资料比较(例)
[1]
孙强,周海洋,胡志前. 全腹腔镜下胃癌根治术腔内吻合技术和消化道重建研究进展[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(2):191-195.
[2]
胡建昆,赵林勇. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术的难点与争议[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2): 91-94.
[3]
Na H-S, Oh A-Y, Ryu J-H, et al. Intraoperative Nefopam Reduces Acute Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Randomized Study[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(5): 771-777.
[4]
Chen QY, Zheng CH, Li P, et a1.Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopie radical gastreetomy or open gastrectomy?[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 2l(5): 853-863.
[5]
Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 21(2): 285-295.
[6]
蒋汉卿,罗永祥. 腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌D2根治术的临床疗效和预后分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(5):418-420.
[7]
林建贤,黄昌明,郑朝辉,等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术的临床疗效分析(附4435例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(3):235-243.
[8]
Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, et al. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? a comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2018, 14(3): 264-269.
[9]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition[J]. Gastric Cancer, 201l, 14(2): 101-112.
[10]
Tan J, Zhu S. Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese patients with gastric cancer[J]. J BUON, 2017, 22(2): 410-416.
[11]
刘晶晶,韩莹波,乔小放,等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中出血性并发症的预防及处理[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(5):434-438.
[12]
王俊江,李晓武,冯兴宇,等. 腹腔镜和开腹D2胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫效果分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2017,16(11):1144-1148.
[13]
Yang XW, Zhu SH, Li PZ, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients[J]. J BUON, 2018, 23(1): 85-91.
[14]
Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker, D, et al. Association of Bariatric Surgery Using Laparoscopic Banding, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Usual Care Obesity Management With All-Cause Mortality[J]. JAMA, 2018, 319(3): 279-290.
[15]
Imamura T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, et al. Reconstruction method as an independent risk factor for postoperative bone mineral density loss in gastric cancer[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(2): 418-425.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[3] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[13] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[14] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[15] 耿磊, 张照婷, 许磊, 黄海, 孙毅, 杨伏猛, 徐凯, 胡春峰. 帕金森病前驱期基底神经节环路磁共振弥散张量成像的应用研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 995-1003.
阅读次数
全文


摘要