切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

基于三维重建的腹腔镜下胃癌根治术临床效果
董金付1, 陈剑锋1,(), 孙春荣1, 陈一峰1, 杨国荣1, 曹冀为1, 汪庭军1, 陆文1, 周宇1   
  1. 1. 215000 南京医科大学附属苏州医院普外科(苏州市立医院普外科)
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-20 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 陈剑锋

To explore the clinical effect of Three-Dimensional reconstruction model in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Jinfu Dong1, Jianfeng Chen1,(), Chunrong Sun1, Yifeng Chen1, Guorong Yang1, Jiwei Cao1, Tingjun Wang1, Wen Lu1, Yu Zhou1   

  1. 1. General Surgery, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (General Surgery, Suzhou Municipal Hospital) 215000, China
  • Received:2020-04-20 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianfeng Chen
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81831712); Jiangsu Science and Technology Department Research and Development Project(2018 JS3-12)
引用本文:

董金付, 陈剑锋, 孙春荣, 陈一峰, 杨国荣, 曹冀为, 汪庭军, 陆文, 周宇. 基于三维重建的腹腔镜下胃癌根治术临床效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 154-156.

Jinfu Dong, Jianfeng Chen, Chunrong Sun, Yifeng Chen, Guorong Yang, Jiwei Cao, Tingjun Wang, Wen Lu, Yu Zhou. To explore the clinical effect of Three-Dimensional reconstruction model in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 154-156.

目的

探讨三维重建模型在腹腔镜下胃癌根治术(LAG)中的临床效果。

方法

采用随机数字表法将2018年6月至2019年12月间行LAG的84例胃癌患者分为三维组(n=42)和CT组(n=42)。CT组使用CT图像进行术前规划和术中应用,三维组依据CT数据采用Mimics 17.0软件进行患者三维腹腔血管重建,利用三维模型进行术前规划和术中应用。采用SPSS18.0软件进行统计学分析。围术期相关指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验分析;以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

与CT组相比,三维组可明显缩短腹腔镜下胃癌根治术的手术时间、平均住院时间,减少术中出血量及术中输血,增加术中清除淋巴结个数,差异均具统计学意义(P<0.05)。而两组术后首次排气时间、术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

三维腹腔血管重建技术应用于LAG术中准确评估患者腹腔血管的分型及变异情况,在术中提供重要决策作用,具有明显优势,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of three-dimensional reconstruction model in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Methods

84 cases of gastric cancer with LAG from June 2018 to June 2019 treated in our hospital were divided into 3D group (n=42) and CT group (n=42) by adopting the method of random number table. The CT group used CT images for preoperative planning and intraoperative application. Adopting MICs 17.0 software to reconstruct three-dimensional celiac blood vessels according to CT data, the 3D group used three-dimensional models for preoperative planning and intraoperative application. SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The measurement data, such as relevant indicators in perioperative period, were expressed as (±s) and analyzed by independent sample t test. The enumeration data such as postoperative complications were expressed as % and analyzed by χ2 test. Indicating difference by P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with the CT group, the 3D group can apparently shorten the operation time and average hospitalization time of laparoscopic gastrectomy, reducing the amount of intraoperative bleeding and intraoperative blood transfusion, and increasing the number of lymph nodes removed during the operation. The above differences are statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the differences between the two groups in first postoperative exhaust time and the incidence of postoperative complications are of no statistical significance (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Three dimensional reconstruction of celiac blood vessels applying to laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can accurately evaluate the classification and variation of patients' celiac blood vessels , which can provide important decision-making role during the operation. It has obvious advantages and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 84例胃癌患者行LAG术不同术前规划两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 Michele腹腔动脉分型
表3 84例胃癌患者行LAG术不同术前规划两组患者围术期相关指标比较(±s)
表4 84例胃癌患者行LAG术不同术前规划两组患者术后相关资料比较(例)
[1]
孙强,周海洋,胡志前. 全腹腔镜下胃癌根治术腔内吻合技术和消化道重建研究进展[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(2):191-195.
[2]
胡建昆,赵林勇. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术的难点与争议[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2): 91-94.
[3]
Na H-S, Oh A-Y, Ryu J-H, et al. Intraoperative Nefopam Reduces Acute Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Randomized Study[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(5): 771-777.
[4]
Chen QY, Zheng CH, Li P, et a1.Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopie radical gastreetomy or open gastrectomy?[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 2l(5): 853-863.
[5]
Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 21(2): 285-295.
[6]
蒋汉卿,罗永祥. 腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌D2根治术的临床疗效和预后分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(5):418-420.
[7]
林建贤,黄昌明,郑朝辉,等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术的临床疗效分析(附4435例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(3):235-243.
[8]
Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, et al. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? a comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2018, 14(3): 264-269.
[9]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition[J]. Gastric Cancer, 201l, 14(2): 101-112.
[10]
Tan J, Zhu S. Laparoscopic gastrectomy in obese patients with gastric cancer[J]. J BUON, 2017, 22(2): 410-416.
[11]
刘晶晶,韩莹波,乔小放,等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中出血性并发症的预防及处理[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(5):434-438.
[12]
王俊江,李晓武,冯兴宇,等. 腹腔镜和开腹D2胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫效果分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2017,16(11):1144-1148.
[13]
Yang XW, Zhu SH, Li PZ, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients[J]. J BUON, 2018, 23(1): 85-91.
[14]
Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker, D, et al. Association of Bariatric Surgery Using Laparoscopic Banding, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Usual Care Obesity Management With All-Cause Mortality[J]. JAMA, 2018, 319(3): 279-290.
[15]
Imamura T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, et al. Reconstruction method as an independent risk factor for postoperative bone mineral density loss in gastric cancer[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(2): 418-425.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要