切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 104 -106. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.01.030

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜SMA与SMV左侧为界D3根治术治疗右半肠癌的临床价值比较
任宇峰1,(), 张海波1, 田健1, 杜海军1, 孙鹏1   
  1. 1. 102600 北京市仁和医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-24 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 任宇峰

Comparison of clinical value of laparoscopic SMA and left-sided SMV D3 radical resection for right hemi-bowel cancer

Yufeng Ren1,(), Haibo Zhang1, Jian Tian1, Haijun Du1, Peng Sun1   

  1. 1. General Surgery, Renhe Hospital, Beijing 102600
  • Received:2020-02-24 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Yufeng Ren
引用本文:

任宇峰, 张海波, 田健, 杜海军, 孙鹏. 腹腔镜SMA与SMV左侧为界D3根治术治疗右半肠癌的临床价值比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 104-106.

Yufeng Ren, Haibo Zhang, Jian Tian, Haijun Du, Peng Sun. Comparison of clinical value of laparoscopic SMA and left-sided SMV D3 radical resection for right hemi-bowel cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 104-106.

目的

比较腹腔镜肠系膜上动脉(SMA)与肠系膜上静脉(SMV)左侧为界D3根治术治疗右半肠癌的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2017年8月至2019年11月接受手术治疗的83例右半肠癌患者病例资料,将SMA左侧作为术中淋巴结清扫内侧界线的40例患者纳入SMA组,将SMV左侧作为术中淋巴结清扫内侧界线的43例患者纳入SMV组。采用SPSS 25.0软件包处理数据,手术相关指标、淋巴清除情况等计量资料以(±s)描述,行独立t检验;并发症等计数资料行χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

SMA组术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间与SMV组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SMA组手术时间、术后引流量、术后引流放置时间、平均阳性淋巴结数量、平均淋巴结清扫总数均比SMV组长/多,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SMA组术后并发症总发生率比SMV组高(42.5% vs. 20.9%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

相较于以SMV左侧为界,腹腔镜SMA左侧为界右半肠癌D3根治术可对病灶进行更加彻底的清扫,但术后并发症较多,临床选择需谨慎。

Objective

To compare the clinical value of laparoscopic SMA with left-sided radical resection of SMV in the treatment of right hemi-intestinal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 83 cases of right half bowel cancer patients undergoing surgery from August 2017 to November 2019. 40 patients with left side of SMA as medial boundary of intraoperative lymph node dissection were included in the SMA group (40 patients). 43 patients with the left side of SMV as the medial line of lymph node dissection during the operation were included in the SMV group (43 cases). SPSS 25.0 software package was used to proofread the whole group of data, surgical related indicators, lymphatic clearance and other measurement data were described by (±s), and independent t tests were performed; counting data such as complications were described χ2 test was performed, P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Compared with the SMV group, operative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time, and length of hospital stay in the SMA group were not significantly different from those in the SMV group (P>0.05). The operative time, the drainage volume, drainage placement time, average number of positive lymph nodes and average total number of lymph node dissections in SMA group were longer or more than those in SMV group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in SMA group was higher than that in SMV group (42.5% vs. 20.9%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with the left side of SMV, D3 radical resection of right hemi-intestinal cancer with the left side of laparoscopic SMA as the boundary can perform more thorough clearance of the lesion, but there are more postoperative complications, so the clinical selection needs to be careful.

表1 83例右半肠癌患者不同术中淋巴结清扫方法两组基线资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 83例右半肠癌患者不同术中淋巴结清扫方法两组手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 83例右半肠癌患者不同术中淋巴结清扫方法两组淋巴结清除情况及术后恢复情况比较(±s)
表4 83例右半肠癌患者不同术中淋巴结清扫方法两组术后并发症情况比较(例)
[1]
韩文峰,张有成.左右半结肠癌病理特征及治疗新策略研究进展[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2019,13(5): 408-411.
[2]
管福军,方志华.三种CME手术治疗Ⅲ期老年右半结肠癌的疗效及安全性比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(3): 279-282.
[3]
许建国,黄宝玉,于浩,等.3D腹腔镜下动脉优先入路治疗右半结肠癌的疗效及预后观察[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2019,13(5): 368-371.
[4]
Bertelsen CA, Larsen HM, Neuenschwander AU,et al.Long-term Functional Outcome After Right-Sided Complete Mesocolic Excision Compared With Conventional Colon Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Questionnaire Study[J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2018,61(9): 1063-1072.
[5]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.结肠癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J/CD].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(8): 50-55.
[6]
曹少祥,严想元,刘文明.三维高清腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的入路选择及疗效分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(5): 461-464.
[7]
Pan L, Ye F, Liu J-J,et al. A study of using carbon nanoparticles to improve lymph nodes staging for laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy in colon cancer[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2018, 33(8): 1131-1134.
[8]
王颢,赵权权.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术关键血管评估及处理[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(3): 267-271.
[9]
李关宁,杨振淮.腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术应用改良中间入路和传统中间入路的近期效果比较[J].中国综合临床,2019, 35(2): 173-176.
[10]
姜慧员,刘海义,白文启,等.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌D3根治术临床安全性及可行性研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 454-457.
[11]
周乐其,李健文,陆爱国,等.以肠系膜上动脉左侧为右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫内侧界可行性研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2019, 39(7): 712-715.
[12]
谢斌耀,李世红,任旭.腹腔镜技术用于右半结肠癌手术的安全性及入路分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019, 13(5): 458-460.
[13]
Hagihara K, Takahashi H, Miyoshi N,et al.Case of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for ascending colon cancer after aortic graft replacement and revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery: Colon cancer, revascularization[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2018,11(3): 266-269.
[14]
王勇,张冬生,封益飞,等.以肠系膜上动脉为导向的腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(8): 896-899.
[15]
Pelz JOW, Wagner J, Lichthardt S,et al.Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer-has the control group so far been chosen correctly?[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018,16(1): 117.
[16]
Garcia-Granero A, Sanchez-Guillen L, Fletcher-Sanfeliu D,et al. Application of three-dimensional printing in laparoscopic dissection to facilitate D3-lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer[J].Tech Coloproctol,2018,22(2): 129-133.
[17]
孙跃明,封益飞,张冬生,等.以肠系膜上动脉为导向的右半结肠全结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019, 18(8): 753-760.
[18]
刁德昌,万进,易小江,等.腹腔镜下保留植物神经右半结肠癌D3根治术的可行性及应用价值[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018, 21(8): 908-912.
[19]
黄泉龙,金英虎,王贵玉.结肠癌CME与D3根治术:平面与血管之争[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2019,8(6): 627-630.
[20]
Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, et al. Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(6): 2721-2731.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[7] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[10] 兰运升, 赵梓竣. 腹腔镜下高位与低位结扎肠系膜下动脉对低位直肠癌患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 551-553.
[11] 崔宏帅, 冯丽明, 东维玲, 韩博. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术+IGLN清扫术治疗局部进展期结肠肝曲癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[12] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[13] 关国欣, 罗福文. 结肠癌合并急性梗阻的个性化处理[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 459-463.
[14] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要