切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -38. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.01.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留自主神经的腹腔镜直肠癌切除术效果研究及腹膜后自主神经的筋膜解剖学观察
丁鹏1,(), 谢方利1, 刘海科1, 刘聪1   
  1. 1. 235000 安徽省淮北市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-16 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 丁鹏

Clinical effect of autonomic nerve-preserving laparoscopic rectal cancer resection and the clinical observation of fascial anatomy of retroperitoneal autonomic nerve

Peng Ding1,(), Fangli Xie1, Haike Liu1, Cong Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, People’s Hospital of Huaibei City, Anhui 235000, China
  • Received:2020-03-16 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Peng Ding
  • Supported by:
    Science and technology research and development program of Anhui Province(2016SF-81)
引用本文:

丁鹏, 谢方利, 刘海科, 刘聪. 保留自主神经的腹腔镜直肠癌切除术效果研究及腹膜后自主神经的筋膜解剖学观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 35-38.

Peng Ding, Fangli Xie, Haike Liu, Cong Liu. Clinical effect of autonomic nerve-preserving laparoscopic rectal cancer resection and the clinical observation of fascial anatomy of retroperitoneal autonomic nerve[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 35-38.

目的

探讨保留自主神经(PANP)的腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的临床效果并阐明腹膜后自主神经的筋膜解剖学表现。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年6月收治行直肠癌切除术治疗的78例中低位直肠癌患者资料,按术式不同将其分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,各39例。其中腹腔镜组行PANP的腹腔镜直肠癌切除术,开腹组行PANP的开腹直肠癌切除术。采用SPSS 22.0统计软件进行数据分析。围术期指标等计量资料用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症、排尿功能等计数资料采用行χ2检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组手术时间比开腹组长,其余围术期指标均优于开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组残尿量低于开腹组,最大尿流率高于开腹组,排尿功能障碍总发生率显著小于开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组勃起功能障碍与射精障碍总发生率显著低于开腹组(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜下PANP的直肠癌切除术可取得与开腹手术相近的手术效果,且在改善患者术后排尿功能与性功能方面更具优势,具有较高安全性与可行性。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of autonomic nerve-preserving laparoscopic rectal cancer resection and to clarify the anatomical manifestations of the retroperitoneal autonomic nerve.

Methods

From January 2015 to June 2019, retrospective analysis were performed in 78 patients with low and middle rectal cancer who underwent rectal cancer resection in our hospital, who were divided into the laparoscopic group (n=39) and the open group (n=39) by using the random number table method. In the laparoscopic group, autonomic nerve-preserving laparoscopic rectal cancer resection was performed, and in the open group, fascial anatomy of the autonomic nerve was observed during the operation, and the perioperative indexes and postoperative complications were analyzed. The clinical effects by using different surgical methods, including sexual and urination function were compared. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 22.0 software. Perioperative indicators and other measurement data were expressed as (±s) and were examined by using independent t test. postoperative complications, such as urinary function, were tested by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time in the laparoscopic group was longer than that in the open group, while the remaining perioperative indexes were better than those in the open group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The residual urine volume in the laparoscopic group was lower than that in the open group, and the maximum urine flow. The rate was higher than those of the open group respectively, and the total incidence of dysuria was significantly lower than that of the open group, with statistically difference (P<0.05). The total incidence of erectile dysfunction and ejaculation were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than those in the open group respectively, with statistically difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Autonomic nerve-preserving laparoscopic rectal cancer resection could achieve similar surgical results to laparotomy, with advantages such as improving patients’ urination and sexual function after surgery.

表1 78例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 78例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s)
表3 78例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者排尿功能比较[(±s),例]
表4 54例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组男性患者性功能比较[例(%)]
表5 78例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后复发、转移情况[例(%)]
[1]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjonataram I,et al.Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN Estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68 (6) : 394-424.
[2]
姚宏伟,张忠涛.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的热点与未来发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(1): 1-4.
[3]
冯波,苏浩.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留盆自主神经的关键技术与意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(1): 8-12.
[4]
郑民华.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术-直肠前间隙的分离与解剖[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1): 21.
[5]
Cappelleri JC,Tseng LJ,Luo X, et al.Simplified Interpretation of the Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function[J]. J Sex Med, 2016,13 (4): 690-696.
[6]
吴现瑞,张宗进,兰平.直肠癌手术常见并发症及其处理[J].腹部外科,2018,31( 1) : 9-14.
[7]
Celentano V, Cohen R, Warusavitarne J,et al.Sexual dysfunctionfollowing rectal cancer surgery[J].Int Colorectal Dis,2017,32( 11) : 1523-1530.
[8]
王海江,葛磊.盆腔植物神经解剖学研究在腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术的标识与应用[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2017,6(6): 463-468.
[9]
Liu Y, Lu XM, Tao KX, et al.Anatomical Basis and Clinical Research of Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation With Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer[J]. Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2016,36 (2): 211-214.
[10]
裴利祥.探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术治疗结直肠癌患者的临床疗效[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(33): 50.
[11]
古朝阳,王自强,邓祥兵.低位直肠癌手术中直肠系膜周围解剖与操作平面要点[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37( 6) : 686-691.
[12]
Wei HB, Fang JF, Zheng ZH,et al.Effect of preservation of Denonvilliers’fascia during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectalcancer on protection of male urinary and sexual functions[J].Medicine( Baltimore),2016,95( 24) : e3925.
[13]
Kim JH, Kinugasa Y, Hwang SE,et al.Denonvilliers’fascia revisited[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2015,37( 2) : 187-197.
[14]
刘骞,王锡山.直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫手术指征和清扫范围[J].中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(3): 311-315.
[15]
赵勇,卓光鑽,张斌,等.腹腔镜直肠癌术后排尿功能障碍的危险因素分析[J].结直肠肛门外科,2020,26(1): 41-45.
[16]
Hamamoto H, Yamamoto M, Masubuchi S,et al.Male sex and anterior wall tumor location as risk factors for urinary dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal surgery[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(8): 3567-3573.
[17]
Deng WH, Zheng YB, Tong SL,et al.[Efficiency analysis on functional protection of nerve plane-oriented laparoscopic total mesorectal excision][J].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi,2019,22(12): 1144-1151.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[12] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要