切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 569 -572. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.06.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

多措施联合的腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝癌合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症的临床应用研究
贾守洪1, 鲁旭1,(), 彭彬1   
  1. 1. 638000 四川广安,四川大学华西广安医院(广安市人民医院)
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-31 出版日期:2020-12-26
  • 通信作者: 鲁旭

Clinical application of multiple measures combined with laparoscopic liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Shouhong Jia1, Xu Lu1,(), Bin Peng1   

  1. 1. Sichuan University Huaxi Guangan Hospital (Guang'an people's Hospital), Sichuan 638000, China
  • Received:2019-10-31 Published:2020-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Xu Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Xu, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation(wj20170526)
引用本文:

贾守洪, 鲁旭, 彭彬. 多措施联合的腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝癌合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症的临床应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 569-572.

Shouhong Jia, Xu Lu, Bin Peng. Clinical application of multiple measures combined with laparoscopic liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 569-572.

目的

探讨多措施联合的腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)治疗肝癌合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年7月经LLR治疗43例肝癌合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症患者资料,其中联合组(n=23)给予多措施联合的LLR,常规组(n=20)给予常规LLR。患者随访情况统计到2019年7月。选用SPSS 22.00统计软件进行数据分析。围术期指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;并发症发生情况采用χ2Fisher检验。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

联合组手术时间、术中出血量、输血量、胃肠减压时间和住院时间显著低于常规组(P<0.05),43例患者中,术后1周内共发生9例并发症,无肝功能衰竭情况发生,联合组术后并发症发生率20.9%(3/23)低于常规组30%(6/20),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合组截止至观察终点复发转移率为46.5%(11/23)小于常规组61.2%(12/20),两组患者截止至观察终点无病生存率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.637,P=0.425)。

结论

多措施联合的LLR治疗肝癌合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症安全可行,术中出血少、手术时间短、并发症少、术后复发率较低。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of multiple measures combined with laparoscopic liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Methods

The clinical data of 43 patients with liver cancer complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, who received laparoscopic hepatectomy from January 2015 to July 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the combined group (n=23) was given multiple measures combined laparoscopic hepatectomy, while patients in the conventional group (n=20) was given conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy. The postoperative follow-up of the patients ended up on July 2019. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 22.0 software. Measurement data, such as Perioperative indicators were expressed as (±s), and were examined by using independent t test. postoperative complications were analyzed by using χ2 test A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion volume, gastrointestinal decompression time and hospital stay in the combined group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group respectively (P<0.05); Among 43 patients, 9 complications occurred within one week after surgery, and no liver failure occurred. The postoperative complication rate was 20.9% (3/23) in the multi-treatment group, which was lower than 30% (6/20) in the conventional group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The recurrence and metastasis rate of the multi-method combination group was 46.5% (11/23), which was lower than 61.2% (12/20) in the conventional group. There was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between two groups until the observation end point (χ2=0.637, P=0.425).

Conclusion

Multi-measurement combined with laparoscopic liver resection for the treatment of liver cancer with cirrhosis and portal hypertension is safe and feasible, with less intraoperative bleeding, shorter operation time, less complications, and lower postoperative recurrence rate.

表1 43例HCC合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症患者不同术式两组一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 43例HCC合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症患者不同术式两组患者围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 43例HCC合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症患者不同术式两组术后并发症发生情况比较(例)
图1 43例HCC合并肝硬化并门静脉高压症患者不同术式两组患者截止至观察终点无病生存曲线比较
[1]
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J.Hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Lancet,2018, 391(10127): 1301-1314.
[2]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A.Cancer statistics,2018[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2018, 68(1): 7-30.
[3]
Berzigotti A, Reig M, Abraldes JG,et al. Portal hypertension and the outcome of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in compensated cirrhosis: a systematic review an meta-analysis[J]. Hepatology,2015, 61(2): 526-536.
[4]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017版)[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017, 33(8): 1419-1431.
[5]
Yang T, Lau WY, Zhang H,et al.Should surgery be carried out in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal hypertension?[J].Hepatology, 2015, 62(3): 976.
[6]
Zhong JH, Li LQ.Portal hypertension should not be a contraindication of hepatic resection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis[J].Hepatology,2015, 62(3): 977-978.
[7]
Cucchetti A, Cescon M, Pinna AD. Portal hypertension and the outcome of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in compensated cirrhosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis. more doubts than clarity[J]. Hepatology,2015, 62(3): 976-977.
[8]
张松,潘树波,谢坤,等.精准肝脏外科理念在肝细胞肝癌治疗中的价值[J].安徽医科大学学报,2016, 51(1): 94-97.
[9]
Schoening WN, Denecke T, Neumann UP. [Preoperative imaging/operation planning for liver surgery][J].Chirurg,2015, 86(12): 1167-1179.
[10]
周雨,简志祥.术前肝储备功能评估与手术决策[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2018, 7(5): 364-370.
[11]
周伟平,王志恒.三维可视化技术对肝脏肿瘤手术治疗的影响[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018, 11(3) 134-137.
[12]
李仓,张启瑜,孙克龙,等.肝癌切除联合选择性减断流术在原发性肝癌合并中重度门静脉高压症中的应用[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015, 27(1): 5-8.
[13]
李梅生,甄作均.腹腔镜肝切除术主要并发症的预防和处理[J/CD].消化肿瘤杂志(电子版),2015, 7(4): 181-183.
[14]
殷子,卢昕,刘宇斌,等.腹腔镜下肝切除术后并发症相关危险因素分析[J/CD].消化肿瘤杂志(电子版),2015, 7(4): 204-208.
[15]
Choo SP, Tan WL, Goh BKP,et al.Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma in Eastern versus Western populations[J].Cancer,2016, 122(22): 3430-3446.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[9] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[10] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[11] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[12] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[13] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[14] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要